Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
29th Symposium on Pesticide Formulations and Delivery Systems
By
Richard Zollinger
Richard Zollinger
1
North Dakota State University
,
Fargo, ND, Symposium Chair and Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
Arlean Rohde
Arlean Rohde
2
ExxonMobile
,
Houston, TX, Symposium Co-chair
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN:
978-0-8031-7506-8
No. of Pages:
187
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2009

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) has initiated the development of protocols for for measuring spray drift reduction technologies (DRTs) related to the application of agricultural protection chemicals. The DRT Program is an EPA-led initiative program to “achieve improved environmental and human health protection through drift reduction by accelerating the acceptance and use of improved and cost-effective application technologies.” The first step in implementing the DRT program is to develop a set of protocols, standard operating procedures, and data quality assurance steps so that the results from any trials or research conducted are scientifically valid and repeatable. A protocol for measuring spray droplet spectra via laser diffraction equipment in a high speed wind tunnel (air velocities >160 kph (100 mph)) was tested. Following the proposed protocol, five reference nozzles were evaluated with spray solutions of deionized water, water + 9 % isopropanol, and water + 0.25 % of a nonionic surfactant. Each of the nozzle and spray solution combinations were evaluated in 160, 193, and 225 kph (100, 120, and 140 mph) airstreams, as well as under static (0 kph) conditions. The results of these atomization studies showed that there were significant differences in droplet spectra between the spray solutions and from the different air velocities. Based on the time to complete the tests, the author suggest using a ±5 % standard deviation values as criteria for accepting atomization tests results.

1.
Sayles
,
G.
,
Birchfield
,
N.
, and
Ellenberger
,
J.
US EPA's Research Proposal for Encouraging the Use of Spray Drift Reduction Technologies
,” Proc. Int. Conf. on Pesticide Application for Drift Management, pp. 204–209. http://pep.wsu.edu/drift04/proceedings.html
2.
EPA
, “
Pesticide Spray Drift Reduction Technologies: Verification and Incentives for Use
,” http://www.epa.gov/etop/forum/problem/progressreports/pest-spray-9-15-06.html
3.
EPA
, “
Environmental Technology Verification Program, Quality Management Plan
,” EPA Publication No. EPA∕600∕R-03∕021;
Office of Research and Development, U. S. Environmental Protection Agency
, Washington DC.
4.
Kosusko
,
M.
,
Bullock
,
K.
,
Birchfield
,
N.
, and
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
Development of a Test Plan to Verify Pesticide Drift Reduction Technologies
,”
ASABE Annual International Meeting
,
American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers
,
St. Joseph, MI
.
5.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
Developments in International Harmonization of Pesticide Drift Management
,”
Phytoparasitica
, Vol.
29
,
2001
, pp. 93–96.
6.
ASTM
, Standard E361-01, “
Standard Methods for Testing Hydraulic Spray Nozzles Used in Agriculture
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2005
.
7.
ASAE
, Standard S572, “
Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra
,” American Society of Agricultural Engineers,
St. Joseph, MI
,
1999
.
8.
ASAE
, Standard S561.1, “
Procedure for Measuring Drift Deposits from Ground, Orchard, and Aerial Sprayers
,” American Society of Agricultural and Biological Engineers,
St. Joseph, MI
,
2004
.
9.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
, “
Field-Collected and AGDISP-Predicted Spray Flux from an Aerial Application
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X Vol.
3
,
2006
, pp. 156–167.
10.
Bird
,
S. L.
,
Perry
,
S. G.
,
Ray
,
S. L.
, and
Teske
,
M. E.
, “
Evaluation of the AgDISP Aerial Spray Algorithms in the AgDrift Model
,”
Envir. Toxicol. Chem.
 0730-7268 Vol.
21
,
2002
, pp. 672–681.
11.
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
,
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Ross
,
J. C.
,
Bagley
,
W. E.
,
Martin
,
D. E.
, and
Fritz
,
B. K.
, “
Spray Adjuvant Effects on Droplet Size Spectra Measured by Three Laser-Based Systems
,”
J. ASTM Int.
 1546-962X Vol.
5
,
2008
, pp. 1–12.
12.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
and
Spray Drift Task Force
,
2001
, www.agdrift.com/PDF_FILES/Tankmix.pdf
13.
Womac
,
A. R.
,
Maynard
,
R. A.
, and
Kirk
,
I. W.
, “
Measurement Variations in Reference Sprays for Nozzle Classification
,”
Trans, ASAE
 0001-2351 Vol.
42
,
1999
, pp. 609–616.
14.
ASTM
, Standard E1620-97, “
Terminology Relating to Liquid Particles and Atomization
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2004
.
15.
ASTM
, Standard E1260-05, “
Standard Test Method for Determining Liquid Drop Size Characteristics in a Spray Using Optical Nonimaging Light-Scattering Instruments
,” Annual Book of ASTM Standards,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2005
.
16.
Matthews
,
G. A.
,
Pesticide Application Methods
,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
,
New York
,
1988
, p. 336.
17.
Lan
,
Y.
,
Fritz
,
B. K.
,
Hoffmann
,
W. C.
, and
Huang
,
Y.
, “
Effect of Adjuvant Physical Properties on Spray Characterization
,” ASABE Paper No.08-4174,
2008
.
18.
Sanderson
,
R.
,
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Huddleston
,
E. W.
, and
Ross
,
J. B.
, “
Relative Drift Potential and Droplet Size Spectra of Aerially Applied Propanil Formulations
,”
Crop Prot.
Vol.
16
,
1997
, pp. 717–721.
19.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, “
Droplet Size Spectra Classification Categories in Aerial Application Scenarios
,”
Crop Prot.
Vol.
27
,
2008
, pp. 1284–1288.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal