Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Pesticide Formulations and Delivery Systems, 27th Volume: Traditional and Non-Traditional Developments
By
Craig Martin
Craig Martin
1
FMC Corporation
,
Symposium Chairman, Princeton, NJ
Search for other works by this author on:
Gregory Lindner
Gregory Lindner
2
Uniqema
,
Symposium Co-Chairman
Search for other works by this author on:
Arlean Rohde
Arlean Rohde
3
ExxonMobil
,
Symposium Co-Chairman
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-4498-9
ISBN:
978-0-8031-4498-9
No. of Pages:
104
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2008

Fairy ring is the common name for a complex disease of turf encompassing the appearance of mushrooms, circles of stimulated grass, or rings of damaged or dead turfgrass maintained for lawns, athletic fields, or golf courses. Type-I fairy ring is especially destructive due to the development of water repellent or hydrophobic soil conditions and the subsequent decline and damage to the existing turfgrass. Fairy ring management strategies, particularly the control or suppression of Type-I fairy ring symptoms, has been inconsistent in effectiveness. The objective of this field study was to evaluate the efficacy of fungicides recommended for fairy ring control when applied alone and with a soil surfactant. This research was conducted on cool-season turfgrass in California in 2005, and in Pennsylvania in 2006. The same treatments were applied at both locations. The four fungicide treatments were evaluated at 620 g active ingredient (a.i.) azoxystrobin∙ha−1, 9757 g a.i. flutolanil∙ha−1, 310 g a.i polyoxin-D∙ha−1, or 558 g a.i. pyraclostrobin∙ha−1. Each fungicide was applied alone and in a tank-mix combination with the modified alkylated polyol soil surfactant (100 % concentration) at 19 L product∙ha−1. All treatments were applied at two water carrier volumes of 814 and 1628∙ L∙ha−1. At both locations, Type-I fairy ring symptoms were noticeably reduced in plots treated with fungicides plus soil surfactant at either water carrier volume versus plots treated with fungicides alone applied at 814 L water carrier ha−1. Therefore, the consistently best overall treatment for the control or suppression of Type-I fairy ring symptoms was fungicides plus soil surfactant at either water carrier volume. The application of plant protection products at the lower water volume is preferred by turfgrass managers and practitioners; thus the utility of soil surfactants applied with fungicides is a useful strategy for the chemical control of fairy ring in turf.

1.
Couch
,
H. B.
,
Diseases of Turfgrasses
,
Kreiger Publishing
,
Malabar, FL
,
1995
.
2.
Fidanza
,
M. A.
, “
Conquering Fairy Ring Disease with New Tools
,”
Golf Course Management
, Vol.
67
, No.
3
,
1999
, pp. 68–71.
3.
Smiley
,
R. W.
,
Dernoeden
,
P. H.
, and
Clarke
,
B. B.
,
Compendium of Turfgrass Diseases
,
APS Press
,
Minneapolis, MN
,
1992
.
4.
Smith
,
J. D.
,
Jackson
,
N.
, and
Woolhouse
,
A. R.
,
Fungal Diseases of Amenity Turf Grasses
,
E & F.N. Spon
,
New York, NY
,
1989
.
5.
Shantz
,
H. L.
and
Piemeisel
,
R. L.
, “
Fungus Fairy Rings in Eastern Colorado and Their Effects on Vegetation
,”
Journal of Agricultural Research
 0368-1157, Vol.
11
,
1917
, pp. 191–245.
6.
Vargas
,
J. M.
,
Managing Turfgrass Diseases
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
,
1994
.
7.
Watschke
,
T. L.
,
Dernoeden
,
P. H.
, and
Shetlar
,
D. J.
,
Managing Turfgrass Pests
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
,
1995
.
8.
Fidanza
,
M. A.
,
Schlossberg
,
M. J.
,
Kostka
,
S. J.
, and
Sanford
,
D. L.
, “
Soil Hydrophobicity Associated with Type-I Fairy Ring in Turfgrass
,”
Geophysical Research Abstracts
, No.
7
,
2005
, pp. 86–87.
9.
Gelernter
,
W.
and
Stowell
,
L. J.
, “
Fairy Ring and Localized Dry Spot: New Management Approaches
,”
PACE Insights
, Vol.
5
, No.
10
,
1999
, pp. 1–4.
10.
Karnok
,
K. J.
and
Tucker
,
K. A.
, “
Dry Spots Return This Summer
,”
Golf Course Management
, Vol.
67
, No.
5
,
1999
, pp. 49–52.
11.
Fidanza
,
M. A.
, “
Combination Treatments for Fairy Ring Prove Effective
,”
Turfgrass Trends in Golfdom
, Vol.
59
, No.
2
,
2003
, pp. 62–64.
12.
Fidanza
,
M. A.
,
Colbaugh
,
P. F.
,
Couch
,
H. B.
,
Davis
,
S. D.
, and
Sanford
,
D. L.
, “
Conventional and Innovative Methods for Fairy Ring Management in Turfgrass
,”
Science and Golf
, No.
4
,
2002
, pp. 631–642.
13.
Fidanza
,
M. A.
,
Sanford
,
D. L.
,
Wetzel
,
H.
 Jr.
, and
Nattle
,
J. S.
, “
Evaluation of Fungicides, a Soil Wetting Agent, and Cultural Practices for Curative Fairy Ring Control, 2001
,” Fungicide and Nematicide Tests, 58:T036, DOI: 10.1094/FN58,
American Phytopathological Society
, St. Paul, MN,
2003
.
14.
Fidanza
,
M. A.
,
Sanford
,
D. L.
,
Wetzel
,
H.
 Jr.
, and
Nattle
,
J. S.
, “
Evaluation of Fungicides and Soil Wetting Agents for Fairy Ring Management on Creeping Bentgrass, 2001
,” Fungicide and Nematicide Tests, 58:T038, DOI: 10.1094/FN58,
American Phytopathological Society
, St. Paul, MN,
2003
.
15.
Kostka
,
S. J.
, “
Amelioration of Water Repellency in Highly Managed Soils and the Enhancement of Turfgrass Performance through the Systematic Application of Surfactants
,”
J. Hydrol.
 0022-1694, No.
231–232
,
2000
, pp. 359–368.
16.
Mead
,
R.
,
Curnow
,
R. N.
, and
Hasted
,
A. M.
,
Statistical Methods in Agriculture and Experimental Biology
,
Chapman and Hall/CRC Press
,
Boca Raton, FL
,
2003
.
17.
SAS Institute
,
SAS/STAT Guide for Personal Computers
, Version 6.
SAS Institute
,
Cary, NC
,
1987
.
18.
Rossi
,
F. S.
, “
Application Technology Needs More Attention
,”
Golfweek's Superintendent News
, Vol.
4
, No.
5
,
2002
, pp. 10, 25.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal