Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Pesticide Formulations & Delivery Systems, 26th Volume: Reassessing Pesticide Technologies
By
Greg Lindner
Greg Lindner
1
Uniqema
,
Symposium Co-Chairman
Search for other works by this author on:
Masoud Salyani
Masoud Salyani
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
Craig Martin
Craig Martin
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-3403-7
ISBN:
978-0-8031-3403-4
No. of Pages:
84
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2008

Although considerable research has been done on effectiveness of drift retardants for many years, answers to some questions are still unclear to applicators. Laboratory tests were conducted to evaluate drift potentials associated with off-target ground and airborne spray deposits discharged with a hollow cone nozzle spraying three different drift retardants at a high operating pressure and various wind velocities in a wind tunnel. Droplet sizes and spray widths were also determined with a laser imaging system and a portable spray patternator. At 1655 kPa pressure and 4.65 L/m flow rate, the volume median diameters of droplets from the hollow cone nozzle discharging spray mixtures containing water only, polyvinyl polymer, nonionic colloidal polymer and polyacrylamide polymer drift retardants were 201, 222, 239, and 210 µm, respectively. The major spray pattern width was not changed after drift retardants were added into the spray carrier. For the wind velocity from 1 to 5 m/s in the wind tunnel, the polyacrylamide drift retardant produced the highest airborne deposit among the three drift retardants, followed by polyvinyl, and then nonionic colloidal. Also, the polyacrylamide drift retardant produced the highest ground drift potential, followed by nonionic colloidal and then polyvinyl. According to the results from this laboratory study, both nonionic colloidal and polyvinyl polymer drift retardants reduced the drift potential compared to the spray carrier containing water only.

1.
Ozkan
,
H. E.
,
Reichard
,
D. L.
,
Zhu
,
H.
, and
Akerman
,
K. D.
, “
Effect of Drift Retardant Chemicals on Spray Drift, Droplet Size and Spray Pattern
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: 13th Volume
, ASTM STP 1183,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
1993
.
2.
Miller
,
P. C. H.
,
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, and
Bagley
,
W. E.
, “
Adjuvant Effects on Spray Characteristics and Drift Potential
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: 21st Volume
, ASTM STP 1414,
ASTM International
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
2001
.
3.
VanGessel
,
J. M.
, and
Johnson
,
Q. R.
, “
Evaluating Drift Control Agents to Reduce Short Distance Movement and Effect on Herbicide Performance
,”
Weed Technol.
 0890-037X, Vol.
19
,
2005
, pp. 78—85.
4.
Kirk
,
I. W.
, “
Spray Mix Adjuvants for Spray Drift Mitigation—Progress Report
,” ASAE Annual International Meeting, Paper Number: 03.1060, Las Vegas, NV,
2003
.
5.
Bouse
,
L. F.
,
Carlton
,
J. B.
, and
Jank
,
P. C.
, “
Effect of Water Soluble Polymers on Spray Droplet Size
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
31
, No.
6
,
1988
, pp. 1633–1641.
6.
Reichard
,
D. L.
,
Zhu
,
H.
,
Downer
,
R. A.
,
Fox
,
R. D.
,
Brazee
,
R. D.
, and
Ozkan
,
HE.
, “
A Laboratory System to Evaluate Effects of Shear on Spray Drift Retardants
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
36
, No.
6
,
1996
, pp. 1993–1999.
7.
Zhu
,
H.
,
Dexter
,
R. W.
,
Fox
,
R. D.
,
Reichard
,
D. L.
,
Brazee
,
R. D.
, and
Ozkan
,
H. E.
, “
Effects of Polymer Composition and Viscosity on Droplet Size of Re-circulated Spray Solutions
,”
J. Agric. Eng. Res.
 0021-8634, Vol.
67
,
1997
, pp. 35–45.
8.
VanGessel
,
J. M.
, and
Johnson
,
Q. R.
, “
Evaluation of Drift Retardants (Drift Control Agents) Two Year Summary
,” Research report submitted to the Delaware Soybean Board for Funding,
2000
.
9.
Miller
,
P. C. H.
and
Butler
,
M. C.
, “
Effects of Formulation on Spray Nozzle Performance for Applications from Ground-Based Boom Sprayers
,”
Crop Protection
, Vol.
19
,
2000
, pp. 609–615.
10.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
, and
Bagley
,
W. E.
, “
Evaluation of the Effects of Adjuvants on Agricultural Spray Characteristics
,” 8th International Conference on Liquid Atomization and Spray Systems,
Pasadena, CA
,
2000
, pp. 349–353.
11.
Anonymous, ASAE S572 AUG99: Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra, MI,
2003
.
12.
Womac
,
A. R.
,
Maynard
, ,
R. A.
 II
, and
Kirk
,
I. W.
, “
Measurement Variations in Reference Sprays for Nozzle Classification
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
42
, No.
3
,
1999
, pp. 609–616.
13.
Reichard
,
D. L.
,
Zhu
,
H.
,
Fox
,
R. D.
, and
Brazee
,
R. D.
, “
Wind Tunnel Evaluation of a Computer Program to Model Spray Drift
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
35
, No.
3
,
1992
, pp. 755–758.
14.
Derksen
,
R. C.
,
Ozkan
,
H. E.
,
Fox
,
R. D.
, and
Brazee
,
R. D.
, “
Droplet Spectra and Wind Tunnel Evaluation of Venturi and Pre-Orifice Nozzles
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
42
, No.
6
,
1999
, pp. 1573–1580.
15.
Fox
,
R. D.
,
Derksen
,
R. C.
,
Zhu
,
H.
,
Downer
,
R. A.
, and
Brazee
,
R. D.
, “
Airborne Spray Collection Efficiency on Nylon Screen
,”
Appl. Eng. Agric.
 0883-8542, Vol.
20
, No.
2
,
2004
, pp. 147–152.
16.
Zhu
,
H.
,
Reichard
,
D. L.
,
Fox
,
R. D.
,
Brazee
,
R. D.
, and
Ozkan
,
H E
, “
Simulation of Drift of Discrete Sizes of Water Droplets From Field Sprayers
,”
Trans. ASAE
 0001-2351, Vol.
37
, No.
5
,
1994
, pp. 1401–1407.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal