Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Performance of Protective Clothing: Global Needs and Emerging Markets: 8th Volume
By
PD Yarborough
PD Yarborough
Senior Research Chemist
1
E. I. du Pont de Nemours & Company, Inc.
?
Richmond, Virginia Symposium Co-Chairperson and Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
CN Nelson
CN Nelson
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-3488-6
ISBN:
978-0-8031-3488-1
No. of Pages:
619
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2005

A study was conducted to compare the two methods, Henriques Burn Integral and Stoll criteria, in thermal protective performance evaluation on firefighter clothing composites exposed to various thermal hazards. The thermal hazards that the firefighter may encounter during fire fighting are low level thermal radiation and high intensity flashover fire. With the simulation of these thermal hazards in the lab, the heat flux behind exposed clothing composites are characterized with flux rise rate and peak heat flux. Comparisons were performed on the prediction differences of clothing system made using Henriques Burn integral and Stoll criteria under different conditions. The study demonstrated that in some cases less difference is predicted by the two methods, while in other cases a significant difference is observed. Several recommendations were made for the qualitative prediction of garment and fabric thermal protective performance under different situations.

1.
Stoll
,
A. M.
and
Chianta
,
M. A.
, “
Method and Rating System for Evaluation of Thermal Protection
,”
Aerospace Medication
, Vol.
40
,
1969
, pp. 1232–1238.
2.
Stoll
,
A. M.
and
Greene
,
L. C.
, “
Relationship Between Pain and Tissue Damage Due to Thermal Radiation
,”
Journal of Applied Physiology
, Vol.
14
,
1959
, pp. 373–383.
3.
Henriques
,
F. C.
and
Moritz
,
A. R.
, “
Studies of Thermal Injury: I The Conduction of Heat to and Through Skin and the Temperatures Attained Therein. A Theoretical and Experimental Investigation
,”
American Journal of Pathology
, Vol.
23
,
1947
, p. 531.
4.
Abbott
,
N. J.
and
Schulman
,
S.
, “
Protection from the Fire: Nonflammable Fabrics and Coating
,”
Journal of Coated Fabrics
, Vol.
6
,
07
1976
, pp. 48–64.
5.
Utech
,
H. P.
, “
High Temperatures vs. Fire Equipment
,”
International Fire Chief
, Vol.
39
,
1973
, pp. 26–27.
6.
Lawson
,
J. R.
, “
Fire Fighters' Protective Clothing and Thermal Environments of Structural Fire Fighting
,”
Performance of Protective Clothing
,
Stull
Jeffrey O.
and
Schwope
Arthur D.
, Eds, Vol.
6
,
1996
, pp. 334–352.
7.
Krasney
,
J. F.
,
Rocett
,
J. A.
, and
Huang
,
D.
, “
Protecting Fire Fighters Exposed in Room Fires: Comparison of Results of Bench Scale Tests for Thermal Protection and Conditions During Room Flashover
,”
Fire Technology
 0015-2684, Vol.
24
,
02
1988
, pp. 5–19.
8.
Torvi
,
D. A.
and
Dale
,
J. D.
, “
A Finite Element Model of Skin Subjected to a Flash Fire
,”
ASME Journal of Biomechanical Engineering
, Vol.
116
,
1994
, pp. 250–255.
9.
Morse
,
H.
,
Tickner
,
G.
, and
Brown
,
R.
, “
Burn Damage and Burn Depth Criteria
,” Aerotherm Projects 6269 and 6393, Aerotherm TN-75-26,
1975
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal