Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Pesticide Formulations and Delivery Systems: The Continued Evolution of Agrochemicals, 24th Volume
By
GR Goss
GR Goss
1
Oil-Dri Corporation
?
Chicago, IL Co-editor
Search for other works by this author on:
GC Volgas
GC Volgas
2
Helena Chemical Company
?
Memphis, TN Co-editor
Search for other works by this author on:
M Salyani
M Salyani
3
University of Florida
?
Lake Alfred, FL Symposium co-chairman and co-editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-3485-1
ISBN:
978-0-8031-3485-0
No. of Pages:
151
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2005

Glyphosate is the most common non-selective post-emergence herbicide used under diverse conditions. The efficacy of foliar applied herbicides is greatly influenced by adjuvants, but not all adjuvants have a synergistic effect. Greenhouse experiments were conducted using weed species of Echinochola crus-galli, Panicum maximum, Bidens pilosa, and Abutilon theophrasti to evaluate glyphosate efficacy by tank mixing with 0.5 % of Blaze®, Condition®, Improve®, and Induce®. Glyphosate at 0, 0.14, 0.28, and 0.56 kg ae/ha alone and with adjuvants was sprayed at the 4 leaf stage of weeds. Surface tension and contact angle were measured under lab conditions.

Adjuvants increased the activity of glyphosate by 15–29 % compared to glyphosate alone. Among the weed species, higher mortality was observed in P. maximum and B. pilosa followed by E. crus-galli and lowest in A. theophrasti. On mortality of grass and broadleaf weed species, significant differences were observed by tank mixing glyphosate with different adjuvants. Lowest Contact Angle (CA) and Surface Tension (ST) were recorded when glyphosate (Rodeo®, with no surfactant) was mixed with Improve and Blaze surfactants, which was significantly lower than glyphosate formulation pre-mixed with surfactant (Roundup UltraMax®). In the case of Condition, the relative decrease in CA was less than ST when added to glyphosate, compared to Improve and Blaze. Lower ST and CA of glyphosate tank mixed with Improve and Blaze correlated with improved weed mortality in the activity study.

1.
Buhler
,
D. D.
and
Burnside
O. C.
, “
Effect of Water Quality, Carrier Volume, and Acid on Glyphosate Toxicity
,”
Weed Science
, Vol.
31
,
1983
, pp. 163–169.
2.
Haefs
,
R.
,
Schmitz-Eiberger
,
M.
,
Mainx
,
H. G.
,
Mittelstaedt
,
W.
, and
Noga
,
G.
, “
Studies on a New Group of Biodegradable Surfactants for Glyphosate
,”
Pest Management Science
, Vol.
58
,
2002
, pp. 825–833.
3.
Hall
,
G. J.
,
Hart
,
C. A.
, and
Jones
,
C. A.
, “
Plants As Source of Cations Antagonistic to Glyphosate Activity
,”
Pest Management Science
, Vol.
56
,
2000
, pp. 351–358.
4.
Hammerton
,
J. L.
, “
Weed Control Work in Progress at the University of the West Indies, Part 4
,”
Pesticide Articles and News Summary
, Vol.
20
,
1974
, pp. 429–436.
5.
Johnson
,
H. E.
,
Hazen
,
J.L.
, and
Penner
,
D.
, “
Citric Ester Surfactants as Adjuvants with Herbicides
,”
Weed Technology
, Vol.
16
,
2002
, pp. 867–872.
6.
Jordan
,
D. L.
,
York
,
A. C.
,
Griffin
,
J. L.
,
Clay
,
P. A.
,
Vidrine
,
P. R.
, and
Reynold
,
D. B.
, “
Influence of Variables on Efficacy of Glyphosate
,”
Weed Technology
, Vol.
11
,
1997
, pp. 354–362.
7.
Juying
,
W.
and
Dastgheib
,
F.
, “
Interactions Between Glyphosate Formulations and Organosilicone Surfactants on Perennial Grasses
,”
The Brighton Crop Protection Conference-Weeds
, Vol.
2
,
2001
, pp. 695–700.
8.
Kirkwood
,
R. C.
,
Hetherington
,
R.
,
Reynolds
,
T. L.
, and
Marshall
,
G.
, “
Absorption, Localization, Translocation and Activity of Glyphosate in Barnyardgrass (Echinochloa crus-galli (L) Beauv): Influence of Herbicide and Surfactant Concentration
,”
Pest Management Science
, Vol.
56
,
2000
, pp. 359–367.
9.
Liu
,
Z. O.
,
Zabkiewicz
,
J. A.
, and
Zydenbos
,
S. M.
, “
Uptake of Glyphosate into Wheat: Surfactant Interaction and Mechanistic Implications
,”
New Zealand Plant Protection
, Vol.
53
,
2000
, pp. 345–349.
10.
Maclsaac
,
S. A.
,
Paul
,
R. N.
, and
Devine
,
M. D.
, “
A Scanning Electron Microscope Study of Glyphosate Deposits in Relation to Foliar Uptake
,”
Pesticide Science
 0031-613X, Vol.
31
,
1991
, pp. 53–64.
11.
Maschhoff
,
J. R.
,
Hart
,
S. E.
, and
Devine
,
M. D.
, “
A Scanning Electron Microscope Study of Glyphosate Deposits in Relation to Foliar Uptake
,”
Weed Science
, Vol.
48
,
2000
, pp. 2–6.
12.
Norsworthy
,
J. K.
,
Burgos
,
N. R.
, and
Oliver
,
L. R.
, “
Differences in Weed Tolerance to Glyphosate Involve Different Mechanisms
,”
Weed Technology
, Vol.
15
,
2001
, pp. 725–731.
13.
Penner
,
D.
, “
Activator Adjuvants
,”
Weed Technology
, Vol.
14
,
2000
, pp. 785–791.
14.
Pratt
,
D.
,
Kells
,
J. J.
, and
Penner
,
D.
, “
Substitutes for Ammonium Sulfate as Additives with Glyphosate and Glufosinate
,”
Weed Technology
, Vol.
17
,
2003
, pp. 576–581.
15.
Reddy
,
K. N.
and
Singh
,
M.
, “
Organosilicone Adjuvant Effects on Glyphosate Efficacy and Rainfastness
,”
Weed Technology
, Vol.
6
,
1991
, pp. 361–365.
16.
Reddy
,
K. N.
and
Singh
,
M.
, “
Organosilicone Adjuvants Increased the Efficacy of Glyphosate for Control of Weeds in Citrus (Citrus spp.)
,”
Hort Science
, Vol.
27
,
1992
, pp. 1003–1005.
17.
Sandbrink
,
J. J.
,
Dayawon
,
M. M.
, and
Kassebaum
,
J. W.
, “
Non-Silicone-Based Surfactants as Glyphosate Rainfastness Adjuvants
,”
Pesticide Science
, Vol.
38
,
1993
, pp. 272–273.
18.
Satchivi
,
N. M.
,
Wax
,
L. M.
,
Stroller
,
E. W.
, and
Briskin
,
D.P.
, “
Absorption and Translocation of Glyphosate Isopropylamine and Trimethylsulfonium Salts in Abutilon theophrasti and Setaria faberi
,”
Weed Science
, Vol.
48
,
2000
, pp. 675–679.
19.
Sharma
,
S. D.
and
Singh
,
M.
, “
Optimising Foliar Activity of Glyphosate on Bidens frondosa and Panicum maximum with Different Adjuvants Type
,”
Weed Research
, Vol.
40
,
2000
, pp. 523–533.
20.
Singh
,
M.
and
Mack
,
R. E.
, “
Effect of Organosilicone-Based Adjuvants on Herbicide Efficacy
,”
Pesticide Science
, Vol.
38
,
1993
, pp. 219–225.
21.
Singh
,
S.
and
Singh
,
M.
, “
Effect of Growth Stage on Trifloxysulfuron and Glyphosate Efficacy in Twelve Weed Species of Citrus Groves
,”
Weed Technology
,
2004
(accepted for publication).
22.
Thelen
,
K. D.
,
Jackson
,
E. P.
, and
Penner
,
D.
, “
The Basis for the Hard Water Antagonism of Glyphosate Activity
,”
Weed Science
, Vol.
43
,
1995
, pp. 541–548.
23.
Wanamarta
,
G.
,
Kells
,
J. J.
, and
Penner
,
D.
, “
Overcoming Antagonistic Effects of Na- bentazone on Sethoxydim Absorption
,”
Weed Technology
, Vol.
7
,
1993
, pp. 322–325.
24.
Willard
,
T. R.
,
Shilling
,
D. G.
,
Haller
,
W. T.
, and
Langeland
,
K. A.
, “
Physico-Chemical Factors Influencing the Control of Torpedograss with Glyphosate
,”
Journal of Aquatic Plant Management
, Vol.
36
,
1998
, pp. 11–15.
25.
Young
,
B. G.
,
Knepp
,
A. W.
,
Wax
,
L. M.
, and
Hart
,
S. E.
, “
Glyphosate Translocation in Common Lambsquarters (Chenopodium album) and Velvetleaf (Abutilon theophrasti) in Response to Ammonium Sulfate
,”
Weed Science
, Vol.
51
,
2003
, pp. 151–156.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal