Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Stainless Steels for Medical and Surgical Applications
By
GL Winters
GL Winters
1
Cedar Creek, Texas,
USA
Search for other works by this author on:
MJ Nutt
MJ Nutt
2
Spinal Innovations
,
Bartlett, Tennessee,
USA
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-3459-2
ISBN:
978-0-8031-3459-1
No. of Pages:
286
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2003

Since MRI (magnetic resonance imaging) scanners became available in the 1980's, they have rapidly become one of the most common clinical imaging tools. The MR environment produces unique safety and compatibility issues for materials used in implants and medical devices. The principal issues for MR safety and compatibility are magnetically induced displacement force and torque, radio frequency (RF) heating, and image artifact. This paper defines and discusses the potential hazards produced by implants and devices in the MR environment, with an emphasis on stainless steels. It also describes MR safety and compatibility test methods developed by ASTM and summarizes ongoing MR standards development work.

1.
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
, “
A Primer on Medical Device Interactions with Magnetic Resonance Imaging Systems
,” http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/ode/primerf6.html,
07
02
1997
.
2.
Center for Devices and Radiological Health
, http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/safety/mrisafety.html, “
MRI Safety Web Site
.”
3.
ECRI
, “
The Safe Use of Equipment in the Magnetic Resonance Environment
,”
Health Devices
, Vol.
30
,
2001
, pp. 421–444.
4.
Kanal
E.
,
Special Cross-Specialty Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology: Practical MR Safety Considerations for Physicians, Physicists, and Technologists 2001
.
RSNA
,
Oak Brook, IL
,
2001
.
5.
Zaremba
L. A.
, “
Regulatory Issues in MR Safety
,” in
Special Cross-Specialty Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology: Practical MR Safety Considerations for Physicians, Physicists, and Technologists 2001
,
Kanal
E.
, Ed.
RSNA
,
Oak Brook, IL
,
2001
, pp. 103–110.
6.
Bozorth
R. M.
,
Ferromagnetism
.
IEEE, Inc.
,
New York, NY
,
1978
.
7.
Van Vlack
L. H.
,
Materials Science for Engineers
.
Addison-Wesley
,
Reading, MA
,
1970
.
8.
Schenck
J. F.
, “
The Role of Magnetic Susceptibility in Magnetic Resonance Imaging: MRI Magnetic Compatibility of the First and Second Kinds
,”
Medical Physics
, Vol.
23
,
1996
, pp. 815–850.
9.
Purcell
E. M.
,
Electricity and Magnetism, Berkeley Physics Course, Volume 2
.
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
1985
.
10.
McFadden
J. T.
, “
Metallurgical Principles in Neurosurgery
,”
Journal of Neurosurgery
, Vol.
31
,
1969
, pp. 373–385.
11.
Dujovny
M.
,
Kossovsky
N.
,
Kossowsky
R.
,
Valdivia
R.
,
Suk
J. S.
,
Diaz
F. G.
,
Berman
K.
, and
Cleary
W.
, “
Aneurysm Clip Motion during Magnetic Resonance Imaging: In Vivo Experimental Study with Metallurgical Factor Analysis
,”
Neurosurgery
, Vol.
17
,
1985
, pp. 543–548.
12.
Dujovny
M.
,
Kossovsky
N.
,
Kossowsky
R.
,
Diaz
F. G.
, and
Ausman
J. I.
, “
Magnetic Aneurysm Clips: Correlation with Martensite Content and Implications for Nuclear Magnetic Resonance Examination
,”
Surgical Forum
, Vol.
34
,
1983
, pp. 525–527.
13.
Brick
R. M.
,
Pense
A. W.
, and
Gordon
R. B.
,
Structure and Properties of Engineering Materials
, 4th ed.,
McGraw Hill
,
New York
,
1977
.
14.
CDRH
, MDR-R100222, http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/maude.html, 1/8/85.
15.
Chen
D. W.
, “
Boy, 6, dies of skull injury during M.R.I.
,”
New York Times
 0362-4331. New York,
31
07
2001
, pp. B1, B5.
16.
Chaljub
G.
,
Karmer
L. A.
,
Johnson
R. F.
 III
,
Johnson
J. R.F.
,
Singh
H.
, and
Crow
W.
, “
Projectile Cylinder Accidents Resulting from the Presence of Ferromagnetic Nitrous Oxide or Oxygen Tanks in the MR Suite
,”
American Journal of Roentgenology
, Vol.
177
,
2001
, pp. 27–30.
17.
B. Condon
,
Hadley
D. M.
, and
Hodgson
R.
, “
The ferromagnetic pillow: a potential MR hazard not detectable by a hand-held magnet
,”
The British Journal of Radiology
, Vol.
74
,
2001
, pp. 847–851.
18.
Woods
T. O.
,
Grossman
L. W.
,
Graham
A. A.
, and
Johannessen
J. N.
, “
The Effect of a 2T Magnetic Field on Flow Delivered by Oxygen Regulators
,” 2002 FDA Science Forum — FDA:
Building a Multidisciplinary Foundation
,
Washington, DC
,
2002
.
19.
Thome
R. J.
and
Tarrh
J. M.
,
MHD and Fusion Magnetics, Field and Force Design Concepts
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
1982
.
20.
Klucznik
R. P.
,
Carrier
D. A.
,
Pyka
R.
, and
Haid
R. W.
, “
Placement of a Ferromagnetic Intracerebral Aneurysm Clip in a Magnetic Field with a Fatal Outcome
,”
Radiology
, Vol.
187
,
1993
, pp. 855–856.
21.
Nyenhuis
J. A.
,
Bourland
J. D.
, and
Kildishev
A. V.
, “
Safety Considerations of Rapidly Switched Gradients in MR Environments
,” in
Special Cross-Specialty Categorical Course in Diagnostic Radiology: Practical MR Safety Considerations for Physicians, Physicists, and Technologists 2001
,
Kanal
E.
, Ed.
RSNA
,
Oak Brook, IL
,
2001
, pp. 103–110.
22.
CDRH
, MDR-M709484, http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/maude.html, 5/1/95.
23.
CDRH, MDR-M297255, http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/maude.html, 6/26/92.
24.
CDRH, MDR-M729534, http://www.fda.gov/cdrh/maude.html, 9/22/95.
25.
Bellon
E. M.
, et al
, “
MR Artifacts: A Review
,”
American Journal of Roentgenology
, Vol.
147
,
1986
, pp. 1271–1281.
26.
Shellock
F. G.
, “
Biological Effects and Safety Aspects of Magnetic Resonance Imaging
,”
Magnetic Resonance Quarterly
, Vol.
5
,
1989
, pp. 243–261.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal