Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Stainless Steels for Medical and Surgical Applications
By
GL Winters
GL Winters
1
Cedar Creek, Texas,
USA
Search for other works by this author on:
MJ Nutt
MJ Nutt
2
Spinal Innovations
,
Bartlett, Tennessee,
USA
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-3459-2
ISBN:
978-0-8031-3459-1
No. of Pages:
286
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2003

Stainless steel cable systems have been designed for a multitude of orthopaedic implant applications. Various implant fixation, cerclage, and tension banding techniques may be used with cable constructs to stabilize a variety of simple and complex bone fractures. Multifilament cable products, however, can pose special challenges regarding metallurgical evaluation and mechanical property testing. The present project investigated the metallurgical and mechanical properties of a new 316L stainless steel cable system designed for general trauma surgery. Important cable attributes such as strand configuration, cable construction, and finishing options are discussed. The advantages of inductively coupled plasma spectroscopy analysis are presented for the compositional verification of solid cable specimens. Metallographic methods for the examination of nonmetallic inclusion limits and grain size are described for a cable construct composed of 75 fine wires. The microstructure associated with laser remelted cable ends is documented via light microscopy. Unique tension test methods are described for the determination of failure load and elongation of 1.1 and 1.7 mm diameter cable sizes. Test results are compared with generalized requirements compiled in ASTM F 2180 Standard Specification for Metallic Implantable Strands and Cables.

1.
Synthes (USA)
, “
The Orthopaedic Cable System Technique Guide
,” Brochure GP1369-A,
1999
, pp. 2–20.
2.
Dall
,
D.M.
, “
Reconstruction of the Femur in Total Hip Replacement Using Multifilament Cerclage Cables Fastened with Crimp Sleeves
,” In:
Bone Implant Grafting
,
Older
J.
, Ed.,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
,
1992
, pp. 135–155.
3.
Lie
,
A.
,
O'Connor
,
D.O.
, and
Harris
,
W.H.
, “
Comparison of Cerclage Techniques Using a Hose Clamp Versus Monofilament Cerclage Wire or Cable
,”
Journal of Arthoplasty
, Vol. No.
12
,
7
,
1997
, pp. 772–776.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal