Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Spinal Implants: Are We Evaluating Them Appropriately?
By
MN Melkerson, M.S.
MN Melkerson, M.S.
1
Symposium chairman and co-editor
;
Food Drug Administration Center for Devices and Radiological Health Office of Device Evaluation
?
9200 Corporate Boulevard Rockville, MD 20850
Search for other works by this author on:
JS Kirkpatrick, M.D.
JS Kirkpatrick, M.D.
2
Symposium co-chairman and co-editor
;
University of Alabama, Birmingham and Birmingham Veterans Administration Medical Center
?
940 Faculty Office Tower 510 20th Street South Birmingham, Alabama 35294
Search for other works by this author on:
S Griffith, Ph.D.
S Griffith, Ph.D.
3
Symposium co-chairman and co-editor
;
Centerpulse Spine-Tech Division
?
7375 Bush Lake Road Minneapolis, MN 55439
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-3463-0
ISBN:
978-0-8031-3463-8
No. of Pages:
246
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2003

Extrusion of lumbar interbody fusion devices is a rare, though well-described, complication. Extrusion has been seen with a variety of interbody devices and surgical techniques. It is most commonly seen when implants are placed using a posterior approach. Extrusion results from instability of the final construct following implantation, or misplacement of the device. Instability can result from placement of an undersized implant or excessive resection of the facet joints. In each case, an error in surgical technique can be identified which leads to the extrusion. A design flaw of the implant is generally not the cause for the extrusion.

1.
Kuslich
,
S. D.
,
Ulstrom
,
C. L.
,
Griffith
,
S. L.
 et al
, “
The Bagby and Kuslich Method of Lumbar Interbody Fusion: History, Techniques, and 2-Year Follow-up Results of a United States Prospective, Multicenter Trial
,”
Spine
1998
,
23
, pp. 1267–1278.
2.
Uzi
,
E. A.
,
Dabby
,
D.
,
Tolessa
,
E.
,
Finkelstein
,
J. A.
, “
Early Retropulsion of Titanium-Threaded Cages After Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Report of Two Cases
,”
Spine
, No.
26
,
2001
, pp. 1073–1075.
3.
McAfee
,
P. C.
,
Cunningham
,
B. W.
,
Lee
,
G. A.
, et al
, “
Revision Strategies for Salvaging or Improving Failed Cylindrical Cages
,”
Spine
, Vol.
24
,
1999
, pp. 2147–2156.
4.
Elias
,
W. J.
,
Simmons
,
N. E.
,
Kaptain
,
G. J.
, et al
, “
Complications of Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion When Using a Titanium Threaded Caged Device
,”
Journal of Neurosurgery
, Vol.
93
, (
1
Supplement),
2000
, pp. 45–52.
5.
Glassman
,
S. D.
,
Johnson
,
J. R.
,
Raque
,
G.
, et al
, “
Management of Iatrogenic Spinal Stenosis Complicating Placement of a Fusion Cage
,”
Spine
,
1996
, Vol.
21
, pp. 2383–2386.
6.
Brodke
,
D. S.
,
Dick
,
J. C.
,
Kunz
,
D. N.
, et al
, “
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Biomechanical Comparison, Including a New Threaded Cage
,”
Spine
, No.
22
,
1997
, pp. 26–31.
7.
Boden
,
S. D.
,
Martin
,
C.
,
Rudolph
,
R.
, et al
, “
Increase of Motion Between Lumbar Vertebrae after Excision of the Capsule and Cartilage of the Facet: A Cadaver Study
,”
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
, Vol.
76
,
1994
, pp. 1847–1853.
8.
Goh
,
J. C. H.
,
Wong
,
H.
,
Thambyah
,
A.
, and
Yu
,
C.
, “
Influence of PLIF Cage Size on Lumbar Spine Stability
Spine
, Vol.
25
,
2000
, pp. 35–40.
9.
McAfee
,
P.C.
, “
Interbody Fusion Cages in Reconstructive Operations on the Spine
,”
Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery
, Vol.
81-A
,
1999
, pp. 859–880.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal