Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Pesticide Formulations and Delivery Systems: Meeting the Challenges of the Current Crop Protection Industry
By
RA Downer
RA Downer
1
Ohio State University
?
Wooster, OH Symposium Co-chairman and Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
JC Mueninghoff
JC Mueninghoff
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
GC Volgas
GC Volgas
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-3453-3
ISBN:
978-0-8031-3453-9
No. of Pages:
192
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2003

Hydrocarbon fluids and oils are commonly used as adjuvants to improve the wetting and spreading properties of a pesticide formulation. An improvement in wetting leads to an increase in the area of contact of a pesticide on a target and usually, although there are exceptions, translates to an increase in efficacy. Target coverage (area per drop) is controlled by a variety of physical and chemical properties of the fluid or oil; these include surface tension, viscosity, and specific gravity. In this study, the influence of these physical factors as well as the composition of the hydrocarbon fluids on the wetting of Sorghum halepense (johnsongrass) and other model substrates has been investigated.

The wetting properties, as measured by contact angle, of four different series of hydrocarbon fluids (normal paraffins, isoparaffins, mixed aliphatics containing iso-, cyclo- and normal paraffins, and aromatics) have been systematically examined on a variety of surfaces (johnsongrass, extracted johnsongrass wax, paraffin wax, Parafilm® and wax paper). It has been shown that hydrocarbon fluids are very good wetters (θ< 30°) of these substrates. Attempts to correlate contact angle measurements with the physical properties of hydrocarbon fluids were unsuccessful until the compositions of the fluids were considered. When the type of hydrocarbon fluid is taken into account, very good correlations are achieved for normal paraffinic, isoparaffinic and aromatic fluids. Mixed aliphatic fluids, as expected, show poorer correlations.

1.
Barrentine
,
J. L.
and
Warren
,
G. F.
,
1970
, “
Isoparaffinic Oil as a Carrier for Chlorpropham and Terbacil
,”
Weed Science
, Vol.
18
, pp. 365–372.
2.
Brumbaugh
,
E. H.
,
Roggenbuck
,
F. C.
, and
Penner
,
D.
,
1995
, “
Surface Tension and Spreading as Indicators for Spray Adjuvant Efficacy
,”
Proceedings of Fourth International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemical
,
New Zealand Forest Research Institute
,
Rotorua
, pp. 260–265.
3.
Chambers
,
G. V.
,
1987
, “
The Role of Orchex® 796 in Pesticide Applications
,”
Proceedings of the International Conference on Pesticides in Tropical Agriculture
,
MARDI
,
Kuala Lumpur
.
4.
Chambers
,
G. V.
,
Bulawa
,
M. C.
,
McWhorter
,
C. G.
, and
Hanks
,
J. E.
,
1992
, “
Use of Surface Relationship Models to Predict the Spreading of Nonaqueous Droplets on Johnsongrass
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems, 11th Vol.
, STP 1112,
ASTM
,
Philadelphia
, pp. 218–246.
5.
Green
,
J. M.
and
Green
,
J. H.
,
1993
, “
Surfactant Structure and Concentration Strongly Affect Rimsulfuron Activity
,”
Weed Technology
, Vol.
7
, pp. 633–640.
6.
Green
,
J. M.
and
Hazen
,
J. L.
,
1998
, “
Understanding and Using Adjuvant Properties to Enhance Pesticide Activity
,”
Proceedings of the 5th International Symposium on Adjuvants for Agrochemicals
,
ISSA
,
Memphis, TN
, pp. 25–36.
7.
Harr
,
J.
,
Guggenheim
,
R.
,
Schulke
,
G.
, and
Falk
,
R. H.
,
1991
,
The Leaf Surface of Major Weeds
,
Sandoz Agro Ltd.
,
Basel
.
8.
Hazen
,
J. L.
,
2000
, “
Adjuvants - Terminology, Classification and Chemistry
,”
Weed Technology
, Vol.
14
, pp. 773–784.
9.
Kwon
,
Y. W.
,
Lee
,
J. K.
, and
Chung
,
B. J.
,
1989
, “
Interaction of Adjuvants with Rice Leaf Surface in Spraying Fungicide
,”
Adjuvants and Agrichemicals
, Vol.
II
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton
, pp. 63–74.
10.
Manthey
,
F. A.
,
Nalewaja
,
J. D.
, and
Szelezniak
,
E. F.
,
1989
, “
Esterified Seed Oils with Herbicides
,”
Adjuvants and Agrichemicals
, Vol.
II
,
CRC Press
,
Boca Raton
, pp. 139–148.
11.
Manthey
,
F. A.
,
Szelezniak
,
E. F.
, and
Nalewaja
,
J. D.
,
1996
, “
Relationship Between Spray Droplet Spread and Herbicide Phytotoxicity
,”
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems
,
16th
Vol., STP 1312,
ASTM
,
Philadelphia
, pp. 182–191.
12.
Martin
,
J. T.
and
Juniper
,
B. E.
,
1970
, “
The Cuticle of Plants
,”
St. Martin's Press
,
New York
, pp. 44–47.
13.
McWhorter
,
C. G.
and
Barrentine
,
W. L.
,
1988
, “
Spread of Paraffinic Oil on Leaf Surfaces of Johnsongrass (Sorghum halepense)
,”
Weed Science
, Vol.
36
, pp. 111–117.
14.
Stock
,
D.
and
Holloway
,
P. J.
,
1993
, “
Possible Mechanisms for Surfactant-induced Foliar Uptake of Agrochemicals
,”
Pesticide Science
 0031-613X, Vol.
38
, pp.165–177.
15.
Treacy
,
M. R.
,
Benedict
,
J. H.
,
Schmidt
,
K. M.
, and
Anderson
,
R. M.
,
1988
, “
Enhancement of Field Efficacy of a Pyrethroid Insecticide Against the Boll Weevil (Coleoptera: curculionidae)
,”
Proceedings of the Beltwide Cotton Production Research Conference
,
National Cotton Council of America
.
16.
VanValkenburg
,
J. W.
,
1982
, “
Terminology, Classification and Chemistry
,”
Adjuvants for Herbicides
,
Weed Science Society of America
,
Champaign, IL
, pp. 1–9.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal