Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Bench Testing of Industrial Fluid Lubrication and Wear Properties Used in Machinery Applications
By
GE Totten, PhD
GE Totten, PhD
1
Union Carbide Corporation
?
Tarrytown, New York Symposium Chairman and Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
LD Wedeven, PhD
LD Wedeven, PhD
2
Wedeven Associates Inc.
?
Edgemont, Pennsylvania Symposium Chairman and Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
M Anderson
M Anderson
3
Falex Corporation
?
Sugar Grove, Illinois Symposium Chairman and Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
JR Dickey
JR Dickey
4
Lubricants Consultants
?
Basking Ridge New Jersey Symposium Chairman and Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-2867-3
ISBN:
978-0-8031-2867-5
No. of Pages:
345
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2001

The effects of some commercial friction modifiers on antiwear performance of some steels were assessed experimentally under high contact pressures. The main compounds of the friction modifiers were, respectively, calcium carboxylate compound, organic molybdenum compound, phosphorous/sulfur (P/S) chemistry and polytetrafluoroethylene (PTFE). A ball-on-disk configuration was employed in the wear tests. The sliding speed of the disk on the stationary ball ranged from 0.785 m/s to 1.885 m/s and the applied load ranged from 39.2 N to 78.5 N. Bearing steel, high-carbon steel and medium-carbon steel were used to make the members of sliding pairs. The results show that only the additives that can produce chemical films on rubbing surfaces can reduce friction more effectively. Except PTFE, the other three additives have such an effect, but not as significant as claimed. Among these, P/S chemistry is the best, but this additive can cause excessive wear on rubbing surfaces in long-time use. Mo compound can provide a significant effect of antiwear on all three types of steel subjected to high contact pressures, while Ca compound has an antiwear effect only at comparably low pressures. Both Ca and Mo compounds cause wear on rubbing surfaces in a form of parallel deep grooves. PTFE neither improves antiwear performance, nor reduces friction on the rubbing surfaces of steel.

1.
Papay
,
A. G
, “
Oil-Soluble Friction Reducers—Theory and Application
,”
ASLE, Lubrication Engineering
, Vol.
39
,
1983
, pp. 419–426.
2.
Kubo
,
K.
,
Shimakawa
,
Y.
, and
Kibukawa
,
M.
, “
The Effect of Gear Oil Viscosity and Friction Reducer Type on Transmission Efficiency
,”
Tribology International
, Vol.
19
,
1986
, pp. 312–317.
3.
Pacholke
,
P. J.
, and
Marshek
,
K. M.
, “
Improved Worm Gear Performance with Colloidal Molybdenum Disulfide Containing Lubricants
,”
STLE, Lubrication Engineering
, Vol.
43
,
1987
, pp.623–628.
4.
Arbabi
,
H.
, and
Eyre
,
T. S.
, “
Investigation into the Lubricating Effectiveness of Molybdenum Disulphide Dispersion in a Fully Formulated Oil
,”
Tribology International
, Vol.
19
,
1986
, pp. 87–91.
5.
Yamamoto
,
Y.
, and
Gondo
,
S.
, “
Friction and Wear Characteristics of Molybdenum Dithiocarbamate and Molybdenum Dithiophosphate
,”
STLE, Tribology Transaction
, Vol.
32
,
1989
, pp. 351–357.
6.
Hong
,
H.
,
Riga
,
A. T.
,
Cahoon
,
J. M.
, and
Vinci
,
J. N.
, “
Evaluation of Overbased Sulfonates as Extreme-Pressure Additives in Metalworking Fluids
,”
STLE, Lubrication Engineering
, Vol.
49
,
1993
, pp. 19–24.
7.
Muraki
,
M.
,
Tagawa
,
K.
,
Ide
,
H.
, and
Nakamura
,
T.
, “
Frictional Behaviour of Lubricants during Deep Drawing and Ironing Processes for Zinc-Coated Steel Sheets
,”
Proceedings of Institution of Mechanical Engineers, Part J, Journal of Engineering Tribology
, Vol.
210
,
1996
, pp. 189–197.
8.
Gutman
,
M.
, and
Stottor
,
A.
, “
The Influence of Oil Additives on Engine Friction and Fuel Consumption
,”
ASLE, Lubrication Engineering
, Vol.
41
,
1985
, pp. 150–154.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal