Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: Twentieth Volume
By
AK Viets
AK Viets
1
Bayer Corporation
?
Kansas City, MO Symposium chairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
RS Tann
RS Tann
2
Exxon Chemical Company
?
Houston, TX Symposium co-chairman and co-editor
Search for other works by this author on:
JC Mueninghoff
JC Mueninghoff
3
Huntsman Corporation
?
Houston, TX Symposium chairman-elect and co-editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-2877-0
ISBN:
978-0-8031-2877-4
No. of Pages:
195
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2001

Studies were conducted in the field to measure off-target spray deposition rates from applications of sprays under different application (nozzle/droplet size and boom height) and meteorological conditions. The results were analyzed to investigate the effects of spray quality, boom height and wind speed on spray deposition rates. Curves are presented showing that deposition rates were greater for fine sprays than medium to extra coarse sprays, and for greater boom heights. There was not a strong correlation between deposition rates and wind speed. This was probably due mainly to the relatively far distance of the first sampling location at 25 ft (7.5 m) from the edge of the application area, and to the fact that most of the wind speeds in the studies were greater than the <10 mph (<16 km/hr) where wind speed effects would be most likely to be most evident.

1.
Anon,
1999
, “
Spray Nozzle Classification by Droplet Spectra
,” Standard S-572,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Niles, MI.
2.
Byass
,
J. B.
and
Lake
,
J. R.
,
1977
, “
Spray Drift From a Tractor-Powered Field Sprayer
,”
Pesticide Science
 0031-613X, Vol.
8
, pp. 117–26.
3.
Doble
,
S. J.
,
Matthews
,
G. A.
,
Rutherford
,
I.
, and
Southcombe
,
E. S. E
,
1985
, “
A System for Classifying Hydraulic Nozzles and Other Atomizers into Categories of Spray Quality
,”
Proceedings of 1985 British Crop Protection Conference - Weeds
, Vol.
9A-6
, pp. 1125–33.
4.
Ganzlemeier
,
H.
,
Rautmann
,
D.
,
Spangenberg
,
R.
,
Streloke
,
M.
,
Herrmann
,
M.
,
Wenzelburger
,
H.
, and
Walter
,
H.
,
1995
, “
Studies on the Spray Drift of Plant Protection Products
,”
Blackwell Wissenschafts-Verlag GmbH
Berlin/ Wien
.
5.
Geng
,
S.
,
Li
,
B.
, and
Lin
,
D.
,
1986
,
Variances of Some Commonly Used Transformations and Combinations of Variables for Use in Computing LSD and Other Test Statistics
, Agronomy Progress Report No. 188, Cooperative Extension,
University of California
, Davis.
6.
Hahn
,
G. J. H.
,
1970
, “
Statistical Intervals for a Normal Population, Part I: Tables, Examples and Applications
,”
Journal of Quality Technology
, Vol
2
(
3
), pp. 115–125.
7.
Hahn
,
G.J.
and
Meeker
,
W. Q.
,
1991
, “
Statistical Intervals: A Guide for Practitioners
,”
John Wiley and Sons
,
New York
.
8.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
and
Valcore
,
D. L.
,
1995
, “
Measurement Techniques for Simulated Agricultural Sprays Produced by Ground Sprayers using Number Density Weighted Sampling Techniques
,”
Proc. ILASS-95
,
Detroit, MI
.
9.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Valcore
,
D. L.
, and
Bryant
,
J. E.
,
1996
, “
Spray Drift Task Force Atomization Droplet Size Spectra Measurements
,”
Proceedings ILASS-Americas 96
.
10.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Valcore
,
D. L.
,
Esterly
,
D.
, and
Teske
,
M. E.
,
1997
, “
“What If” Drift Mitigation Scenarios With the AgDRIFT® Model
,” ASAE Paper No. 971073.
11.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Valcore
,
D. L.
, and
Teske
,
M. E.
,
1998
, “
Droplet Size Classification Schemes for Agricultural Sprays
,”
Proceedings ILASS-Americas 98
,
Sacramento, CA
.
12.
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
Johnson
,
D. R.
,
Fish
,
J. D.
,
Hermansky
,
C. G.
, and
Valcore
,
D. L.
,
1999
, “
The Development of the Spray Drift Task Force Database on Pesticide Movements for Aerial Agricultural Spray Applications
,” Submitted to
Atomization and Sprays
.
13.
Hewitt
,
A.J.
,
Stern
,
A.J.
,
Bagley
,
W.E.
, and
Dexter
,
R.
,
1999
, “
The Formation of A New ASTM E35.22 Task Group to Address Drift Management Adjuvants
,”
19th Symposium on Pesticide Formulations and Applications Systems: Global Pest Control Formulations for the Next Millennium, ASTM STP 1373
,
Tann
R. S.
,
Nalewaja
J. D.
, and
Viets
A.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
West Conshohocken, PA
.
14.
Jandel
,
M.
,
1992
,
TableCurve Automated Curve Fitting Software, User's Manual, Version 1.12 for Windows
, Jandel Scientific 2591 Kerner Blvd, San Rafael, CA 94901.
15.
Mickle
,
R. E.
,
1998
, Review of the Spray Drift Task Force Ground Field Trials, Prepared for U.S. EPA Workshop, 1998, RE. Mickle., REMSpC, 12 Welsh Dr, Ayr, ON Canada.
16.
Southcombe
,
E. S. E.
,
Miller
,
P. C. H.
,
Ganzelmeier
,
H.
,
Van de Zande
,
J. C.
,
Miralles
,
A.
, and
Hewitt
,
A. J.
,
1997
, “
The International (BCPC) Spray Classification System Including a Drift Potential Factor
,”
Proceedings British Crop Protection Conference
, Vol.
5A-1
, pp. 371–380.
17.
Teske
,
M. E.
,
Bird
,
S. L.
,
Esterly
,
D. M.
,
Ray
,
S. L.
and
Perry
,
S. G.
,
1997
, “
A User's Guide for AgDRIFT® 1.0: A Tiered Approach for the Assessment of Spray Drift of Pesticides
,” Technical Note No. 95-10, CDI, Princeton, NJ, U.S.A.
18.
Weissberg
,
A.
and
Beatty
,
G. H.
,
1960
,
Tables for Tolerance-Limit Factors for Normal Distributions
,
Technometrics
 0040-1706 Vol.
2
(
4
), pp. 483–500.
19.
Wilson
,
B. G.
,
Adams
,
B. J.
, and
Karney
,
B. W.
,
1990
, “
Bias in Log-Transformed Frequency Distributions
,”
Journal of Hydrology
Vol.
118
, pp. 19–37.
20.
Wolter
,
K., M.
,
Introduction to Variance Estimation
,
Springer-Verlag
,
New York
,
1985
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal