Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Hydraulic Failure Analysis: Fluids, Components, and System Effects
By
GE Totten
GE Totten
1
Union Carbide Corporation
?
Tarrytown, NY,
USA
Symposium Co-Chairman and Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
DK Wills
DK Wills
2
Sauer-Danfoss
?
Ames, IA,
USA
Symposium Co-Chairman and Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
DG Feldmann
DG Feldmann
3
Technical University of Hamburg-Harburg
?
Hamburg,
Germany
Symposium Co-Chairman and Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-2883-5
ISBN:
978-0-8031-2883-5
No. of Pages:
611
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
2001

Reliable assessment of particle concentration is important for the condition monitoring of fluid power systems. Good filter efficiency and low contamination levels usually imply well working systems. But what should be regarded as low or acceptable levels? Historically bottle sampling has been the reference method for assessment of particle concentration. Recently more and more commercial equipment for on-line connection is available. Many times there is a difference between the two methods, so the question rises: Can we rely on these new on-line methods or is it the bottle sampling that is not good enough for modern, well filtrated fluid power systems?

Sending bottles to different laboratories very often gives different results. This is of course not satisfying. In Scandinavia there are several laboratories that perform particle counting of bottle samples from hydraulic and lubricating systems. Eight of these laboratories formed a group with the aim to produce results with better reproducibility. Good results were achieved on a round robin with MIL-H-5606 hydraulic fluid and standard Air Cleaner Fine Test Dust (ACFTD). Unfortunately similar round robin results from some systems in service with other fluids were completely different. The concentration was far higher compared with on-line measurements and the spread was very large.

The conclusion is that bottle sampling can be very accurate and reliable if the contaminants are standard test dust at high concentrations, with suitable fluids. Good applications can then be filter testing or automatic particle counter calibration. In ordinary fluid power systems, with good filtration, it seems to be very difficult to achieve relevant results.

1.
Radzikowski
P.
, “
On-line Monitoring of Contamination Level in Hydraulic Oils
,” Operational Reliability and System Maintenance,
Holmberg
K.
and
Folkeson
A.
, Eds.,
London
:
Elsevier Applied Science
, copyright 1991, ISBN 1-85166-612-5, p. #207.
2.
Rinkinen
J.
, and
Kiiso
T.
, “
Using Portable Particle Counter in Oil System Contamination Control
,” Third Scandinavian International Conference on Fluid Power,
Linköping
25.26 May 1993, p. #309–328.
3.
Svedberg
,
G.C.
Using an Automatic Particle Counter On-line Extreme Low Contamination Levels Can be Detected in Fluid Power Systems
,” Fourth Scandinavian Conference on Fluid Power, 26–29 Sep. 1995,
Tampere Finland
, p. #759–774.
4.
Hydraulic fluid power—Fluid Sample Containers—Qualifying and Controlling Cleaning Methods
,” ISO 3722:
1976
.
5.
Hydraulic Fluid Power—Calibration of Automatic—Count Instruments for Particles Suspended in Liquids—Method Using Classified AC Fine Test Dust Contaminant
,” ISO 4402:
1991
.
6.
Hydraulic Fluid Power—Fluids—Method for Coding Level of Contamination by Solid Particles
,” ISO 4406:
1987
(E).
7.
Hydraulic Fluid Power—Fluid Contamination—Determination of Particulate Contamination by the Counting Method Using a Microscope
,” ISO 4407:
1991
(E).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal