Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Field Instrumentation for Soil and Rock
By
GN Durham
GN Durham
1
Durham Geo-Enterprises Inc.
,
Stone Mountain, GA 30087
;
Symposium chairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
WA Marr
WA Marr
2
Geocomp Corporation
,
Boxborough, MA 01719
;
Symposium cochairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-2604-2
ISBN:
978-0-8031-2604-6
No. of Pages:
414
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1999

Monitoring of the integrity of electrically non-conductive geomembrane liners installed at waste sites using electrical geophysical techniques has been carried out for a number of years using above-liner leak location surveys and, more recently, below-liner monitoring systems. We compare the theoretical response of both types of survey to a hole in a liner and then compare with measurements made in the field. The theoretical leak response indicates that above-liner surveys are sensitive to leaks over a greater area, though both responses result in comparable leak detectability. However, field data suggest that in practice, measurements made on a sparse grid below the liner have the greater sensitivity to certain leaks. This may be due to the differing leak geometries and background conditions present above and below the liner.

The results indicate that a sparse below-liner monitoring grid, with its long-term monitoring capabilities, combined with above-liner surveys to pinpoint leaks accurately offer a successful approach to ensuring liner integrity throughout the lifetime of a lined waste site.

1.
Anderson
,
W. L.
,
1979
, “
Numerical Integration of Related Hankel Transforms of Orders 0 and 1 by Adaptive Digital Filtering
,”
Geophysics
 0016-8033, Vol.
44
, pp. 1287–1305.
2.
Darilek
,
G. T.
,
Laine
,
D. L.
,
Parra
,
J. O.
,
1989
, “
The Electrical Leak Location Method for Geomembrane Liners : Development and Applications
,” Industrial Fabrics Association International Geosynthetics '89 Conference,
San Diego, CA
, pp. 456–466.
3.
Frangos
,
W.
,
1994
, “
Electrical Detection and Monitoring of Leaks in Lined Waste Disposal Ponds
,” Proceeds of the Symposium on the Application of Geophysics to Engineering and Environment,
1994
,
Englefield, USA
, Vol.
2
, pp. 1073–1082.
4.
Giroud
,
J. P.
, and
Peggs
,
I. D.
,
1990
, “
Geomembrane Construction Quality Assurance
,” In : Waste Management Systems: Construction, Regulation and Performance. Geotechnical Special Publication No 26,
ASCE
, pp. 190–225.
5.
Laine
,
D. L.
,
Mosley
,
N. G.
,
1995
, “
Leak Location Survey of a Soil Covered Geomembrane at a Landfill Site in the UK
,” In : Waste Disposal by Landfill,
A. A. Balkema
,
Rotterdam
, pp. 151–156.
6.
Parra
,
J. O.
,
1988
, “
Electrical Response of a Leak in a Geomembrane Liner
,”
Geophysics
 0016-8033, Vol.
53
, pp. 1445–1452.
7.
Parra
,
J. O.
,
Owen
,
T. E.
,
1988
, “
Model Studies of Electrical Leak Detection Surveys In Geomembrane-Lined Impoundments
,”
Geophysics
 0016-8033, Vol.
53
, pp. 1453–1458.
8.
White
,
C. C.
,
Barker
,
R. D.
,
1997
, “
Electrical Leak Detection System for Landfill Liners: A Case History
,”
Ground Water Monitoring & Remediation
 1069-3629, Vol.
27
, No
3
, pp 153–159.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal