Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Superfund Risk Assessment in Soil Contamination Studies: Third Volume
By
K Hoddinott
K Hoddinott
1
U.S. Army Center for Health Promotion and Preventive Medicine
Aberdeen Proving Ground,
MD
;
Symposium Chairman and STP editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-2484-8
ISBN:
978-0-8031-2484-4
No. of Pages:
162
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1998

Brownfields are vacant, abandoned, or underutilized commercial and industrial sites and facilities where real or perceived environmental contamination is an obstacle to redevelopment. These sites are vacant because they often do not meet the strict remediation requirements of the Superfund Law. The sites are accessible locations with much of the infrastructure, albeit deteriorated, in place. Thus they also represent an opportunity to slow down suburban and rural sprawl. As a liability, the concern stems from the environment liability of both known and unknown site contamination. Influence diagrams are tools used to represent complex decision problems based on incomplete and uncertain information from a variety of sources. The influence diagrams can be used to divide all uncertainties (Brownfields site infrastructure impact assessment) into subfactors until the level has been reached at which intuitive functions are most effective. Given the importance of uncertainties and the utilities of the Brownfields infrastructure, the use of influence diagrams seem more appropriate for representing and solving risks involved in Brownfields infrastructure assessment.

1.
Moldano
,
Monica
.
, “
Brownfields Boom
.”
Civil Engineering
,
American Society of Civil Engineers
,
New York
,
05
1996
, pp. 36–40.
2.
Barnette
,
Curtis H.
, “
Revitalizing Brownfields Sires
.”
Iron Age New Steel
, Vol.
1
, No.
6
,
06
1995
, pp. 88.
3.
Howard
,
R. A.
and
Matheson
,
J. E.
, “
Influence Diagrams
.” In
Howard
and
Matheson
eds. The Principles and Application of Decision Analysis, Menlo Park, California, Vol.
2
,
1984
, pp. 721–762.
4.
Hong
,
Yaun
and
Apostolakis
,
G.
, “
Conditional Influence Diagrams in Risk Management
,”
Risk Analysis
 0272-4332, Vol.
13
, No.
6
,
1993
, pp. 625–636.
5.
Smith
,
J. Q.
, “
Influence Diagrams for Bayesian Decision Analysis
,”
Operational Research
, Vol.
40
,
1989
, pp. 363–376.
6.
Shachter
,
R. D.
, “
Evaluating Influence Diagrams
,”
Operations Research
, Vol.
34
, No.
6
,
1986
, pp. 871–882.
7.
Amekudzi
,
A.
and
Attoh-Okine
,
N.
, “
Conceptual Frameworks for Understanding Brownfields Redevelopment Issues
,”
Infrastructure
,
John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
, Vol.
2
, No. 2,
1997
, pp. 45–59.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal