Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Small Specimen Test Techniques
By
WR Corwin
WR Corwin
1
Oak Ridge National Laboratory
,
Oak Ridge, TN
;
symposium chairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ST Rosinski
ST Rosinski
2
Electric Power Research Institute
,
Charlotte, NC
;
symposium co-chairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
E van Walle
E van Walle
3
SCK CEN
,
Mol,
Belgium
;
symposium co-chairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-2476-7
ISBN:
978-0-8031-2476-9
No. of Pages:
624
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1998

Miniature tensile specimens of A533-B steel were tested as part of the ASTM Cross-Comparison Exercise on Determination of Material Properties Through the Use of Miniature Mechanical Testing Techniques. The microspecimens are 3 mm long with a test section ∼0.3 mm square. Thin slices were cut from the supplied block of material by wire EDM and the microspecimens were machined from the slices with a benchtop CNC mill. Specimens were cut so that the tensile axes were in three orthogonal directions to investigate the anisotropy of the steel block.

A total of 47 microspecimens were pulled in a small test machine with an air bearing to reduce friction in the moving grip. Strain was measured directly on the specimen with a laser-based interferometric technique that used two tiny reflective indentations as gage markers. The entire stress-strain curve was recorded. In addition, five macrospecimens with cross-sections 3.2 mm square were tested in a conventional test machine using foil strain gages.

The coefficient of variation (ratio of standard deviation to mean value) of the microspecimen tests is on the order of 5% for both the yield and ultimate stresses. This sample block of A533-B steel is slightly anisotropic with regard to yield stress, but not ultimate stress. The yield stress — on the order of 440 MPa — and the ultimate stress — on the order of 600 MPa — are consistent with other results. The microspecimens showed yield and ultimate stresses approximately 5% lower than those measured on the macrospecimens.

1.
Sharpe
,
W. N.
, Jr.
and
Wang
,
K. C
, “
Evaluation of a Modified Monotonic Neuber Relation
,”
Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology
 0094-4289 Vol.
113
, pp. 1–8, (
1991
).
2.
Sharpe
,
W. N.
, Jr.
,
Yang
,
C. H.
, and
Tregoning
,
R. L.
, “
An Evaluation of the Neuber and Glinka Relations for Monotonie Loading
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics
 0021-8936, pp. S50–S56, (
1992
).
3.
Sharpe
,
W. N.
, Jr.
, “
Applications of the Interferometric Strain/Displacement Gage
,”
Optical Engineering
, Vol.
21
, pp. 483–88 (
1982
).
4.
Sharpe
,
W. N.
, Jr.
and
Fowler
,
R. O.
, “
A Novel Miniature Test Machine
”ASTM STP 1204. Small Specimen Test Techniques Applied to Nuclear Reactor Vessel Thermal Annealing and Plant Life Extension, pp. 386–401, (
1993
).
5.
Sharpe
,
W. N.
, Jr.
and
Mckeown
,
D. E.
, “
A Miniature Test Machine
”, Proceedings of the 1993 SEM “50th Anniversary” Spring Conference on Experimental Mechanics, pp. 547 – 555, (
1993
).
6.
Sharpe
,
W. N.
, Jr.
and
Markey
,
B. A.
, “
Microsample Testing of Weldments
”, Advances in Engineering Measurements.
The British Society of Strain Measurement
,
Edinburgh
, pp. 64 – 68, (
1994
).
7.
Sharpe
,
W. N.
, Jr.
,
Zeng
,
H.
,
Yuan
,
B.
, and
Wallace
,
S.
, “
A Technique for Microsample Testing of Weldments
”, Fracture '94, The Fourth National Conference on Fracture,
University of the Witwatersrand
,
Johannesburg
, 11 pgs., (
1994
).
8.
Sharpe
,
W. N.
, Jr.
, “
An Interferometric Strain/Displacement Measurement System
”, NASA Technical Memorandum 101638, (
1989
).
9.
Shih
,
C. F.
, et al
, “
Methodology for Plastic Fracture
”, Third Quarterly Report to the
Electric Power Research Institute
,
01
11
1976
to
31
01
1977
.
10.
Reddy
,
G. B.
and
Ayres
D. J.
, “
High Temperature Elastic-Plastic and Creep Properties for SA533 Grade B Class I and SA508 Materials
”, EPRI-NP-2763,
Electric Power Research Institute
, (
12
1983
).
11.
Milne
,
I.
, “
Failure Assessment Diagrams and J Estimate: A Comparison for Ferritic and Austenitic Steels
”,
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
 0308-0161, Vol.
13
, pp. 107–125, (
1983
).
12.
Dally
,
J. W.
,
Riley
W. F.
, and
McConnell
K. G.
, “
Instrumentation for Engineering Measurements
”,
John Wiley & Sons
, (
1984
).
13.
Rosinski
,
S. T.
and
Corwin
W. R.
ASTM Cross-Comparison Exercise on Determination of Material Properties Through Miniature Sample Testing
”, ASTM STP 1329, Small Specimen Test Techniques, (
1997
).
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal