Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Safety in American Football
By
EF Hoerner
EF Hoerner
1
Biomotions, Inc.
,
Braintree, Massachusetts
;
symposium chairman and STP editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-2400-7
ISBN:
978-0-8031-2400-4
No. of Pages:
201
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1997

Injuries on football fields can be grouped into different categories as related to the type of athlete movement and to the relative resiliency—softness of the surface. Many injuries are related to varying degrees of surface hardness. Turfgrasses offer the least hard surface in comparison to other alternatives available for sports activities. This is due to the biomass of the turf plus the associated root zone that provides a unique resilient characteristic or cushion.

Sports participant safety on turfgrasses is maximized by a dense biomass of turfgrass leaves and stems. It is important to select turfgrass species, cultivars, and cultural practices that have the capability of sustaining the highest possible biomass. Considerations in this regard include adaptation, wear tolerance, pest resistance, environmental stress tolerance, and the ability to recover from injury during the time of year when intense use occurs. Proper turf mowing, fertilization, irrigation, and cultivation practices also aid in maximizing the biomass cushion.

The second major dimension is the associated turfgrass root zone. High-sand/soil root zones of the proper particle size distribution are less prone to compaction and resultant hardness, plus the internal environment is more favorable for turfgrass root growth. The high-sand/soil root zones for sports use tend to be somewhat loose and thus benefit from stabilization, such as by the three dimensional, randomly oriented, interlocking 50 by 100 mm mesh elements. This mesh matrice also possesses a flexing action under traffic pressure that results in a self cultivation effect that further improves the environment for root growth by enhanced drainage and aeration.

1.
Beard
,
J. B
and
Sifers
,
S. I.
, “
Feasibility Assessment of Randomly Oriented Interlocking Mesh Element Matrices for Turfed Root Zones
,” ASTM STP 1073,
Natural and Artificial Playing Fields: Characteristics and Safety Features
,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
West Conshohocken, PA
,
1990
, pp. 154–165.
2.
Beard
,
J. B
and
Sifers
,
S. I.
, “
Stabilization and Enhancement of Sand-Modified Root Zones for High Traffic Sports Turfs with Mesh Elements
,”
Texas Agricultural Experiment Station, Texas A&M University System
,
B-1710
,
1993
, 40 pp.
3.
Beard
,
J. B
and
Sifers
,
S. I.
, “
A Randomly Oriented, Interlocking Mesh Element Matrices System for Sport Turf Root Zone Construction
,” in
Proceedings of the International Turfgrass Research Conference
, Vol.
6
,
1989
, pp. 253–257.
4.
Sifers
,
S. I.
,
Beard
,
J. B
, and
Hall
,
M. H.
, “
Turf Plant Responses and Soil Characterizations in Sandy Clay Loam and Clay Loam Soil Augmented by Turf in Interlocking Mesh Elements—1992
,”
Texas Turfgrass Research, Texas Agricultural Experiment Station
, College Station, TX, PR-5142,
1993
, pp. 112–116.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal