Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture (Sixth Volume)Available to Purchase
By
EA Armanios
EA Armanios
1
School of Aerospace Engineering, Georgia Institute of Technology
,
Atlanta, Georgia, symposium chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-2411-2
ISBN:
978-0-8031-2411-0
No. of Pages:
580
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1997

Spool and curved-beam specimens were evaluated to determine the viability of using either one or both of these configurations to characterize the static and fatigue interlaminar tensile behavior of carbon/epoxy laminates. Unidirectional curved-beam and quasi-isotropic spool specimens were fabricated, nondestructively inspected, and statically tested to failure. Tension-tension fatigue tests were conducted at 10 Hz and an R-ratio (σminmax) equal to 0.1 for each specimen configuration. The interlaminar tensile strength of the spool specimen was 12% larger than the strength obtained using curved-beam specimens. In addition, data scatter associated with spool specimens was significantly less than the scatter associated with curvedbeam specimens. The difference in data scatter was attributed to the influence of the fabrication process on the quality of the laminates tested. The fatigue limit at 107 cycles for both specimen types was shown to be at least 40% of the average interlaminar tensile strength. Based on the results of this study, it was concluded that either the spool or the curved-beam specimens can be used to characterize the interlaminar tensile static and fatigue behavior of carbon/epoxy laminates. However, to obtain the most representative results, the test specimen configuration should be selected so that the specimen fabrication process closely simulates the actual component fabrication process.

1.
Johnson
,
W. S.
and
Mall
,
S.
, “
A Fracture Mechanics Approach for Designing Adhesively Bonded Joints
,”
Delamination and Debonding of Materials
, ASTM STP 876,
Johnson
W. S.
, Ed.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1985
, pp. 189–199.
2.
O'Brien
,
T. K.
, “
Generic Aspects of Delamination in Fatigue of Composite Materials
,”
Journal, American Helicopter Society
, Vol.
32
, No.
1
,
01
1987
, pp. 13–18.
3.
O'Brien
,
T. K.
, “
Towards a Damage Tolerance Philosophy for Composite Materials and Structures
,”
Composites Materials: Testing and Design (Ninth Volume)
, ASTM STP 1059,
Garbo
S. P.
, Ed.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1990
, pp. 7–33.
4.
Sun
,
C. T.
and
Kelly
,
S. R.
, “
Failure in Composite Angle Structures—Part II: Onset of Delamination
,”
Journal of Reinforced Plastics and Composites
, Vol.
7
,
05
1988
, pp. 233–244.
5.
Martin
,
R. H.
and
Jackson
,
W. C.
, “
Damage Prediction in Cross-Plied Curved Composite Laminates
,” NASA Technical Memorandum 104089, Hampton, VA,
07
1989
, p. 22.
6.
Mandell
,
J. F.
,
McKenna
,
G. B.
, and
McGarry
,
F. J.
, “
Interlaminar Strength and Toughness of Fiberglass Laminates
,”
Proceedings
, Twenty-ninth Annual Technical Conference, Paper 13-C,
The Society of the Plastics Industry
,
Washington, DC
,
1974
.
7.
Lagace
,
P. A.
and
Weems
,
D. B.
, “
A Through-Thickness Strength Specimen for Composites
,”
Test Methods and Design Allowables for Fibrous Composites: Second Volume
, ASTM STP 1003,
Chamis
C. C.
, Ed.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1989
, pp. 197–207.
8.
Hiel
,
C. C.
,
Sumich
,
M.
, and
Chappell
,
D. P.
, “
A Curved Beam Test Specimen for Determining the Interlaminar Tensile Strength of a Laminated Composite
,”
Journal of Composite Materials
, Vol.
25
,
07
1991
, pp. 854–868.
9.
Martin
,
R. H.
, “
Delamination Failure in a Unidirectional Curved Composite Laminate
,”
Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Tenth Volume)
, ASTM STP 1120,
Grimes
G. C.
, Ed.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1992
, pp. 365–383.
10.
Jackson
,
W. C.
and
Martin
,
R. H.
, “
An Interlaminar Tensile Strength Specimen
,”
Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Eleventh Volume)
, ASTM STP 1206,
Camponeschi
E. T.
, Ed.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1993
, pp. 333–354.
11.
Martin
,
R. H.
and
Jackson
,
W. C.
, “
Damage Prediction in Cross-Plied Curved Composite Laminates
,”
Composite Materials: Fatigue and Fracture (Fourth Volume)
, ASTM STP 1156,
Stinchcomb
W. W.
and
Ashbaugh
N. E.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1993
, pp. 105–126.
12.
Khandoker
,
S. I.
and
Kozik
,
T. J.
, “
Improvement in the Calculation of Through the Thickness Stress in Laminated Heterogeneous Beams
,”
Proceedings
, ASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference,
Pittsburgh, PA
,
1988
, pp. 159–166.
13.
Ko
,
W. L.
, “
Delamination Stresses in Semicircular Laminated Composite Bars
,” NASA Technical Memorandum 4026,
Edwards
,
CA
,
1988
.
14.
Kedward
,
K. T.
,
Wilson
,
R. S.
, and
McLean
,
S. K.
, “
Flexure of Simply Curved Composite Shapes
,”
Composites
, Vol.
20
, No.
6
,
11
1989
, pp. 527–536.
15.
Ko
,
W. L.
and
Jackson
,
R. H.
, “
Multilayer Theory for Delamination Analysis of a Composite Curved Bar Subjected to End Forces and End Moments
,” NASA Technical Memorandum 4139,
Edwards
,
CA
,
1989
.
16.
O'Brien
,
T. K.
and
Salpekar
,
S.
, “
Scale Effects on the Transverse Tensile Strength of Graphite Epoxy Composites
,”
Composite Materials: Testing and Design (Eleventh Volume)
, ASTM STP 1206,
Camponeschi
,
E. T.
 Jr.
, Ed.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1993
.
17.
Engineered Materials Handbook: Composites
, Vol.
1
,
ASM International
,
Metals Park, OH
,
1987
, pp. 304–305.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal