Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Subsurface Fluid-Flow (Ground-Water and Vadose Zone) Modeling
By
JD Ritchey
JD Ritchey
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
JO Rumbaugh
JO Rumbaugh
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-2021-4
ISBN:
978-0-8031-2021-1
No. of Pages:
435
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1996

The flow behavior of an air sparging pilot test was simulated using a finite difference, multiphase flow simulator (TETRAD). The field test is one of the only examples where the airflow pattern in the saturated zone is well known. This is a result of the relative homogeneity of the aquifer and the use of an advanced geophysical monitoring technique known as electrical resistance tomography (ERT). ERT is sensitive to the changing water content of the saturated zone during the test and provided a clear image of the size and shape of the principal region of airflow. In addition to ERT results, slug tests and core analyses provided other key calibration data. The multiphase flow simulations provided a good match to the observed pattern of airflow and pressure changes, indicating that such simulations may be useful for evaluating air sparging performance under other conditions.

1.
Demond
,
A. H.
, and
Roberts
P. V.
,
1987
, “
An examination of relative permeability relations for two-phase flow in porous media
”,
Water Resources Bulletin
 0043-1370, Vol.
23
, pp. 617–628.
2.
Hampton
,
E. R.
,
1963
, “
Ground water in the coastal dune area near Florence, Oregon
”, U. S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1539-K, 36p.
3.
Hinchee
,
R. E.
,
1994
, “
Air sparging state of the art
”, Air Sparging for Site Remediation,
Hinchee
R. E.
, Ed.,
Lewis Publishers
,
Boca Raton
, pp. 1–14.
4.
Ji
,
W., A.
Dahmani
,
D. P.
Ahlfeld
,
J. D. Lin
, and
Hill
E.
, Fall
1993
, “
Laboratory study of air sparging: air flow visualization
”,
Ground Water Monitoring Review
 0277-1926, pp. 115–126.
5.
Johnson
,
R. L.
,
Johnson
P. C.
,
McWhorter
D. B.
,
Hinchee
R. E.
, and
Goodman
I.
, Fall
1993
, “
An overview of in situ air sparging
”,
Ground Water Monitoring Review
 0277-1926, pp. 127–135.
6.
Lundegard
,
P. D.
, and
Andersen
G.
,
1993
, “
Numerical simulation of air sparging performance
”,
National Ground Water Association
,
Dublin, Ohio
, Proceedings Petroleum Hydrocarbon and Organic Chemicals in Ground Water: Prevention, Detection, and Restoration, pp. 461&476.
7.
Lundegard
,
P. D.
, and
LaBrecque
D.
,
1995
, “
Air sparging in a sandy aquifer (Florence, Oregon): actual and apparent radius of influence
”,
Jour. Contain. Hydrology
 0169-7722, Vol.
19
, pp. 1–27.
8.
Peaceman
,
D. W.
,
06
1978
, “
Interpretation of well-block pressures in numerical reservoir simulation
”,
Society of Petroleum Engineers Journal
 0037-9999, pp. 183–194.
9.
Schima
,
S.
,
LaBrecque
,
D. J.
, and
Lundegard
,
P. D.
,
1994
, “
Using resistivity tomography to monitor air sparging
”, Proc. of the Symposium on the Applic. of Geophy. to Engin. and Envir. Problems, Envir. and Engin. Geophy. Soc., pp. 757–774.
10.
Vinsome
,
P. D.W.
, and
Shook
G. M.
,
1993
, “
Multi-purpose simulation
”,
Journal of Petroleum Science and Engineering
 0920-4105, Vol.
9
, pp. 29–38.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal