Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Recent Developments in Geotextile Filters and Prefabricated Drainage Geocomposites
By
SK Bhatia
SK Bhatia
Editor
Search for other works by this author on:
LD Suits
LD Suits
1
New York State Department of Transportation
?
Albany, New York
;
symposium chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-2047-8
ISBN:
978-0-8031-2047-1
No. of Pages:
237
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1996

Presented are results from excavations made to evaluate the performance of various types of edge drains at selected locations on Ontario highways. The pavements are founded on both clay and sand subgrades. The edge drains excavated include Geocomposite Edge Drains, Geotextile Sock-Wrapped Pipe Edge Drains and Geotextile-Wrapped Aggregate Edge Drains. Installation techniques included: Ploughed-in-Place, Trench Excavation, and Mechanical Trencher and Boot. All edge drains were installed after the highway was completed (i.e. retrofit construction). In each case the backfill used was the excavated or displaced shoulder Granular ‘A’ material (typically similar to ASTM D-2940). The observations and resulting test data obtained show differences between the installation concepts and asbuilt construction. Drains that were installed adjacent to and in contact with the pavement edge were found to be separated from the pavement edge by eroded/pumped fine soil particles. This seriously compromised drainage, particularly from any open-graded drainage layer. Tests showed that the granular backfills were up to 1000 times less permeable than the geotextiles used for the edge drains. Recommendations are made for the installation of retrofitted edge drains.

1.
Cedergren
,
H.R.
,
Airman
,
J.A.
, and
O'Brian
K.H.
, “
Development of guidelines for the design of subsurface drainage systems for highway pavement structural sections
”, Final Report No. FHWA-RD-73-14.,
Federal Highway Authority
, Washington, D.C., USA,
1973
, 193p.
2.
Moynahan
,
T.J.
 Jr.
, and
Sternberg
,
Y.M.
, “
Effects on highway subdrainage of gradation and direction of flow within a densely graded base course material
”, Transportation Research Record No. 497, Washington, D.C., USA,
1974
, pp. 50–59.
3.
Ridgeway
,
H.H.
, “
Pavement edge drainage systems
”, Synthesis of Highway Practice Report No. 96, National Cooperative Highway Research Program,
Transportation Research Board
, Washington, D.C., USA,
1982
, 38p.
4.
Raymond
,
G. P.
,
Bathurst
,
R. J.
and
Hajek
,
J.
, “
Geocomposite Edge Drain Evaluation on Ontario Highway 402 at Strathroy
”, Proceedings of the Fifth International Geotextile and Related Products Conference,
Singapore
1994
, Vol.
2
, pp. 743–746.
5.
Giroud
,
J-P.
, “
Filter criteria for geotextiles
”, Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Geotextiles, Vol.
1
, pp. 1982, 103–108.
6.
Koerner
,
R.M.
,
Koerner
,
G.R.
,
Fahim
,
A.K.
, and
Wilson-Fahmy
,
R.F.
, “
Long term performance of geosynthetics in drainage applications
”, National Cooperative Highway Research Program Report 367,
Transportation Research Board, National Research Council
, Washington, D.C.,
1994
, 54p.
7.
Koerner
,
R.M.
,
Koerner
,
G.R.
, “
Lessons learned from geocomposite edge drain clogging due to improper installation
”, Geosynthetics: Lessons Learned from Failures,
Industrial Fabrics Association International
,
1995
, Preprint Vol., pp. 135–141.
8.
Allen
,
D.L.
, and
Fleckenstein
,
L.J.
, “
Field and laboratory comparison of pavement edge drains in Kentucky
”, Transportation Research Record No. 1425,
National Research Council
, Washington, D.C.,
1993
, pp. 1–10.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal