Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Dredging, Remediation, and Containment of Contaminated Sediments
By
KR Demars
KR Demars
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
GN Richardson
GN Richardson
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
RN Yong
RN Yong
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
RC Chaney
RC Chaney
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-2028-1
ISBN:
978-0-8031-2028-0
No. of Pages:
343
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1995

The Canadian Federal Environmental Assessment Review Office is funding the Geotechnical Research Centre to facilitate their participation in the analysis of the Environmental Impact Statement during the public hearings of the Lachine Canal decontamination project. A summary and critical analysis of recent research and practical experience in the interpretation and application of sediment quality criteria and hazard/risk assessment tools was prepared for use in a comparative examination for the Lachine project.

This present survey shows that various approaches can be taken when establishing both sediment quality and remediation criteria, in light of an increasing preference for flexible guidelines that can be adjusted according to specific site conditions and that will marry more than one approach.

Depending on the complexity of the decontamination scenario, there exist different levels of application in the analysis of the hazard and risk. Simple and complex models are available, but their actual application in ongoing sediment decontamination projects is minimal due to lack of understanding of the basics of contaminant exposure assessment and exposure routes.

1.
Adams
,
W. J.
,
Kimerle
,
R. A.
, and
Barnett
,
J. W.
 Jr.
,
1992
, “
Sediment Quality and Aquatic Life Assessment
,”
Environmental Science and Technology
 0013-936X, Vol.
26
, No.
10
, pp. 1864–1875.
2.
Burton
,
G. A.
 Jr.
and
Scott
,
K. J.
,
1992
, “
Sediment Toxicity Evaluations: Their Niche in the Ecological Assessment
,”
Environmental Science and Technology
 0013-936X, Vol.
26
, No.
11
, pp. 2068–2075.
3.
Centre Saint-Laurent
,
1993
, “
Guide pour l'évaluation et le choix des technologies de traitement des sédiments contaminés
” (Guidelines for the evaluation on the choice of treatment technologies for contaminated sediments), Document rédigé par Jean-René Michaud,
Direction du développement technologique
, No. de catalogue: En40-450/1993F.
4.
Chapman
,
M. P.
,
1989
, “
Current Approaches to Developing Sediment Quality Criteria
,”
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
, Vol.
28
, pp. 589–593.
5.
Dermont
,
R.
and
Munawar
,
M.
,
1992
, “
A Simple and Sensitive Assay for Evaluation of Sediment Toxicity Using Lumbriculus Variegatus (Muller)
,”
Hydrobiologia
 0018-8158, Vol.
235/236
, pp. 407–414.
6.
Ministry Environment Canada (MEC)
,
1992
, “
Review and Recommendations for Canadian Interim Environmental Quality Criteria for Contaminated Sites
,”
Inland Water Directorate, Water Quality Branch
, Scientific Series No. 197.
7.
Ministry of Environment Canada (MEC)
,
1985
, “
Problems Associated with Dredging Operations on the St. Lawrence: Situation, Methods and Priority Areas for Research
” Report EPS 4/MA/1, August.
8.
Ministry of Environment Ontario (MEO)
,
1990
, “
Provincial Sediment Quality Guidelines (draft project)
,” p. 21.
9.
Ministère de l'Environnement du Québec (MENVIQ)
,
1988
, “
Critères indicatifs de la contamination des sols et de l'eau souterraine, dans la politique de réhabilitation des terrains contaminés
” (Quality Criteria for contaminated soil and ground water. Policy for the restoration of contaminated soils).
10.
Onishi
,
Y.
,
1985
, “
Chemical Transport and Fate in Risk Assessment
,” in
Principles of Health Risk Assessment
,
Ricci
P. F.
, Ed.,
Prentice-Hall Inc.
,
NJ
, pp. 117–156.
11.
Principles of Health Risk Assessment
,
1985
,
Ricci
P. F.
, Ed.,
Prentice-Hall Inc.
,
NJ
.
12.
Swider
,
J.
and
Kastenberg
,
W. E.
,
1993
, “
Propagation of Uncertainty in Air Toxics Risk Assessment
,” in
Proceedings of the Joint CSCE-ASCE National Conference on Environmental Engineering
, Queen Elizabeth Hotel,
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
, 12–14 July.
13.
Thomas
,
D. J.
,
Martin
,
L. C.
, and
Ruffell
,
J. P.
,
1985
, “
Environmental Assessment of Dredging Technology
,” prepared by
Arctic Laboratories Limited, ESL Environmental Science Limited and EBA Engineering Consultants Ltd.
for the
Environmental Protection Service
, Yellowknife, N.W.T. (unpublished manuscript), 95 pp. + appendices.
14.
USEPA
,
1993
,
Compilation of Ground-water Models
,
van der Heijde
P. K. M.
, and
Elnawawy
O.
,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
,
OK
.
15.
USEPA
,
1991
,
Remediation of Contaminated Sediments
, EPA/625/6-91/028,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, Cincinnati, OH, April.
16.
USEPA
,
1989
,
Sediment Classification Methods Compendium
, Final Draft Report,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, June.
17.
USEPA
,
1989
,
Risk Assessment Guidance for Superfund, Vol. 1. Human Health Evaluation Manual (Part A0)
, EPA/540/1-89-002,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
.
18.
USEPA
,
1989
,
Exposure Factors Handbook
, EPA/600/8-89/043,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
.
19.
USEPA
,
1988
,
Guidance for Conducting Remedial Investigations and Feasibility Studies under CERCLA
,
Office of Emergency and Remedial Responses, U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, Washington, DC, EPA 540 G-890040.
20.
Vigneault
,
Y.
,
1978
, “
Répercussions écologiques du dragage dans le Saint-Laurent
” (Ecological impact of dredging in the St. Lawrence River), Congrès conjoint:
AQTE-FACE
; 8.1–8.32.
21.
Yong
,
R. N.
,
Galvez-Cloutier
,
R.
, and
Phadungchewit
,
Y.
,
1993
, “
Selective Sequential Extraction Analysis of Heavy Metal Retention in Soil
,”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
 0008-3674, Vol.
30
, No.
5
, pp. 834–847.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal