Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Fracture Mechanics: 26th Volume
By
W Reuter
W Reuter
1
EG&G Idaho Ink
,
Idaho Falls, ID
;
symposium chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
JH Underwood
JH Underwood
2
U.S. Army Armament RD Center
?
Watervliet, NY
;
symposium co-chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
JC Newman, Jr Jr
JC Newman, Jr Jr
3
NASA Langley Research Center
?
Hampton, VA
;
symposium co-chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1996-8
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1996-3
No. of Pages:
854
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1995

The current paper characterizes constraint in fracture: J-modified resistance (JMR) curves were developed for two tough structural materials, 6061-T651 (aluminum) and IN718-STA1 (nickel-base superalloy). A wide variety of configurations was tested to consider load configurations from bending to tension including three specimen types (compact tension, center-crack tension, and single-edge notched tension), and a range of ligament lengths and thicknesses, as well as side-grooved and smooth-sided ligaments.

The JMR curves exhibited an inflection point after some crack extension, and the data were excluded beyond the inflection. Qualified JMR curves for the two materials showed similar behavior, but R-curves were identical for equal ligament length-to-thickness ratio, RL, for the aluminum alloy, with increasing slope for increasing RL, while for the nickel, the resistance curves aligned for equal ligament thickness, B, and the slope increased for decreasing B.

Displacements at the original crack tip (δ5) were recorded throughout the test for several specimens. δ5-versus-crack extension curves were developed, and data were excluded beyond the inflection point (as with the JMR curves). The data collapsed into two distinct curves, thought to represent the surface, plane stress effect and the central, plane strain effect. This was observed for both materials.

A technique called profiling is presented for the aluminum alloy only, where the crack face displacements are recorded at the final point of the test as a function of the position throughout the crack cavity, along with an effort to extract the observations in a usable form. Displacements were consistent throughout the cross-section at and behind the original crack tip. In the region where the crack grew, this displacement was developed by a combination of stretch and crack growth. The stretch required to initiate crack extension was a function of the depth beneath the surface into the cross-section.

1.
Irwin
,
G.R.
, “
The Onset of Fast Crack Propagation in High Strength Steel and Aluminum Alloys
,”
Sagamore Research Conference Proceedings
, Vol.
2
(
1956
), pp. 289–305.
2.
Griffith
,
A.A.
, “
The Theory of Rupture
,”
Proceedings, 1st Conference on Applied Mechanics
(
1924
), pp. 55–63.
3.
Rice
,
J.R.
, “
A Path-Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentrations by Notches and Cracks
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics
(
1968
), pp. 379–86.
4.
Ernst
,
H.A.
, “
Further Developments on the Modified J-Integral
,” ASTM STP 995 (
1989
), pp. 306–19.
5.
Constraint Effects in Fracture
, ASTM STP 1171,
Hackett
E.M.
,
Schwalbe
K.-H.
, and
Dodds
,
R.H.
 Jr.
, eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia, PA
(
1993
), 507 pages.
6.
Hellmann
,
D.
, and
Schwalbe
,
K.-H.
, “
Geometry and Size Effects on JR- and δR-Curves Under Plane Stress Conditions
,” ASTM STP 833 (
1984
), pp. 577–605.
7.
Ernst
,
H.A.
,
Schwalbe
,
K.-H.
,
Hellmann
,
D.
, and
McCabe
,
D.E.
, “
Modified J, JM-Resistance Curves Under Plane Stress
,
International Journal of Fracture
, Vol.
37
(
1988
), pp. 83–100.
8.
Saxena
,
A.
, private conversation,
20
04
1994
.
9.
Dodds
,
R.H.
, and
Kirk
,
M.T.
, “
An Analytical and Experimental Comparison of Ji Values for Shallow Through and Part Through Surface Cracks
,” Interim Report (N61533-88-C-0035) to
David Taylor Research Center
(
07
1990
).
10.
ASTM E1152-87, “
Standard Test Method for Determining JR-Curves
,”
1989 Annual Book of ASTM Standards, Vol. 03.01
(
1989
), pp. 814–24.
11.
ASTM E647-91, “
Standard Test Method for Measurement of Fatigue Crack Growth Rates
,”
1992 Annual Book of ASTM Standards (1992) Volume 03.01
.
12.
An Engineering Approach for Elastic-Plastic Fracture Analysis
,
Electric Power Research Institute
Report NP-1931, Research Project 1237-1, prepared by General Electric Company (
07
1981
).
13.
Williams
,
M.L.
, “
Stress Singularities Resulting from Various Boundary Conditions in Angular Comers of Plates in Extension
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics, Transactions of the ASME
, Vol.
74
(
1952
), p 526.
14.
Hutchinson
,
J.W.
, “
Plastic Stress and Strain Fields at a Crack Tip
,”
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
, Vol.
16
(
1968
), pp. 337–47.
15.
Rice
,
J.R.
, and
Rosengren
,
G.F.
, “
Plane Strain Deformation Near a Crack Tip in a Power-Law Hardening Material
,”
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
, Vol.
16
(
1968
), pp. 1–12.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal