Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Fracture Mechanics: 25th Volume
By
F Erdogan
F Erdogan
1
Lehigh University
Symposium Chairman
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1882-1
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1882-9
No. of Pages:
724
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1995

The use of short-rod specimens with chevron notches for determination of fracture toughness is becoming more common. Standards for such evaluations are available for a variety of materials, including some ceramics. The size of the specimens can be substantially reduced with the introduction of the inelastic correction factor. Although the size requirements for linear elastic fracture mechanics application are violated, accurate predictions of fracture toughness can still be made with the application of this correction. This is extremely important because the reduced size of specimens allows for reduction of costs in the experimental procedure. However, the inelastic correction factor is based on the assumption of elasto-plastic material behavior, and might not be applicable to the types of inelasticity associated with fracture in ceramics. The objective of this paper is to discuss the applicability of a similar correction for ceramic like materials. It is known that ceramic materials in general exhibit strong size effects with respect to fracture resistance. This is mainly due to the presence of inelastic effects on the crack surface. These effects become more significant with the reduction of the size of the specimen. A generalization of the Dugdale-Barenblatt cohesive crack model to three dimensions is introduced to analyze the short-rod problem for natural and man-made ceramics. The model is capable of simulating the evolution of both stress free crack and softening process zones in the case of planar propagation. The influence of specimen size is investigated for the mentioned specimen configuration. Insight into crack evolution and load-displacement curves is also provided. Finally, schemes for inelastic or size effect corrections of fracture toughness values are discussed.

1.
Standard test method for short-rod fracture toughness of cemented carbides
, ASTM R771-R87.
2.
Suggested methods for determining the fracture toughness of rock
,”
Ouchterlony
F.
, Working Group Coordinator,
Int. J. Mechs Min Sciences
, vol.
25
, (
1988
), pp.71–96.
3.
Standard test method for plane-strain (chevron-notch) fracture toughness of metallic materials
, ASTM E1304-89.
4.
Barker
,
L.M.
, “
Theory for determining KIc from small, non-LEFM specimens, supported by experiments on aluminum
,”
Int. Journal of Fracture
, vol.
15
, no
6
, (
1979
), pp.515–536.
5.
Barker
,
L.M.
, “
A simplified method for measuring plane strain fracture toughness
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
, vol.
9
, (
1977
), pp.361.
6.
Standard test method for plane-strain fracture toughness of metallic materials
, ASTM E399-92.
7.
Bittencourt
,
T.N.
, “
Computer simulation of linear and nonlinear crack propagation in cementitious materials
,” Ph.D. Dissertation,
Cornell University
, Ithaca, NY, (
1993
).
8.
Standard test method for compressive strength of cylindrical concrete specimens
, ASTM C39-86.
9.
Bazant
,
Z.P.
, “
Should design codes consider fracture mechanics size effects
,” Concrete Design Based on Frarture Mechanics, ACI SP-134, (
1992
), pp.1–23.
10.
Catalano
,
D.M.
, “
Concrete fracture: A linear elastic fracture mechanics approach
,” M.Sc., Dissertation,
Cornell University
, Ithaca, NY, (
1983
).
11.
Yankelevsky
,
D.Z.
and
Reinhardt
,
H.W.
, “
Uniaxial behavior of concrete in cyclic tension
,”
Journal of Structural Engineering, ASCE
, Vol.
115
, No
1
, (
1989
), pp. 166–182.
12.
Hordjik
,
D.A.
, “
Tensile and tensile fatigue behaviour of concrete: experiments, modelling and analyses
,”
Heron
 0046-7316, vol.
37
, no
1
, (
1992
).
13.
Hillerborg
,
A.
,
Modeer
,
M.
, and
Petersson
,
P-E.
, “
Analysis of crack formation and crack growth in concrete by means of fracture mechanics and finite elements
,”
Cement and Concrete Research
 0008-8846, Vol.
6
, (
1976
), pp.773–782.
14.
Ingraffea
,
A.R.
and
Gerstle
,
W.H.
, “
Non-linear fracture models for discrete cack propagation
,” Application of Fracture Mechanics to Cementitious Composites, NATO-ARW, September 4–7, (1984), pp. 171–207.
15.
Ingraffea
,
A.R.
,
Peruchio
,
R.
,
Han
,
T.-Y.
,
Gerstle
,
W.H.
, and
Huang
,
Y.-P.
, “
Three-dimensional finite and boundary element calibration of the short-rod specimen
,” Chevron-Notched Specimens: Testing and Stress Analysis, ASTM STP 855,
Underwood
J.H.
,
Freiman
S.W.
, and
Baratta
G.I.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing Materials
,
Philadelphia
, (
1984
), pp.49–68.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal