Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Dynamic Geotechnical Testing II
By
RJ Ebelhar
RJ Ebelhar
1
RUST E&I
?
11785 Highway Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45241
;
symposium chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
VP Drnevich
VP Drnevich
2
Purdue University
?
1284 Civil Engineering Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907
;
symposium co-chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
BL Kutter
BL Kutter
3
University of California
Department of Civil Engineering,
Davis, CA 95616
;
symposium co-chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1877-5
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1877-5
No. of Pages:
438
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1994

A large-scale computer-controlled injection correction system has been developed to continuously and completely mitigate the adverse effects of membrane compliance for undrained testing of coarse soils and rockfill. The magnitude of volumetric compliance was pre-determined as a function of effective confining stress and soil parameters. Computer-controlled injection or removal of water to continuously offset the volumetric errors was then used to eliminate the deleterious effects of membrane compliance throughout the duration of each test.

The measured volumetric compliance errors were evaluated as relationships between effective confining stress and volumetric compliance. A relationship between material grain size and volumetric compliance was expanded with compliance evaluations for a wide range of gravel sizes which supported the use of a “representative” grain size less than the mean grain size as an indicator to estimate expected volumetric compliance for a given soil. Monotonic and cyclic undrained triaxial load tests were performed on uniformly-graded gravels with and without implementation of the computer-controlled compliance mitigation system. The test results support the hypothesis that such soils are much more susceptible to liquefaction than had previously been considered.

1.
Banerjee
,
N. G.
,
Seed
,
H. B.
, and
Chan
,
C. K.
,
1979
, “
Cyclic Behavior of Dense Coarse-Grained Materials in Relation to the Seismic Stability of Dams
,” Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. UBC/EERC-79/13,
University of California
, Berkeley.
2.
El-Sohby
,
M. A.
and
Andrawes
,
K. Z.
,
06
1972
, “
Deformation Characteristics of Granular Materials Under Hydrostatic Compression
,”
Canadian Geotechnical Journal
 0008-3674, Vol.
9
.
3.
Evans
,
M. D.
, and
Seed
,
H. B.
,
1987
, “
Undrained Cyclic Triaxial Testing of Gravels — The Effect of Membrane Compliance
,” Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. UBC/EERC 87/08,
University of California
, Berkeley.
4.
Frydman
,
S.
,
Zeitlen
,
J. G.
, and
Alpan
,
I.
,
1973
, “
The Membrane Effect in Triaxial Testing of Granular Soils
,”
Journal of Testing and Evaluation, ASTM
, Vol.
1
, No.
1
, pp. 37–41.
5.
Keikbusch
,
M.
and
Schuppener
,
B.
,
1977
, “
Membrane Penetration and its Effects on Pore Pressures
,”
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE
, Vol.
103
, No.
11
, pp. 1267–1279.
6.
Kramer
,
S. L.
and
Sivaneswaran
,
N.
,
1989
). “
A Non-Destructive, Specimen Specific Method for Measurement of Membrane Penetration in the Triaxial Test
,”
Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM
, Vol.
12
, No.
1
, pp. 50–59.
7.
Lo
,
S-C. R.
,
Chu
,
J.
, and
Lee
,
I. K.
,
1989
, “
A Technique for Reducing Membrane Penetration and Bedding Errors
,”
Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM
, Vol.
12
, No.
4
, pp. 311–316.
8.
Martin
,
R. G.
,
Finn
,
W. D.
 L.
, and
Seed
,
H. B.
,
1978
, “
Effects of System Compliance on Liquefaction Tests
,”
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE
, Vol.
104
, No.
4
, pp. 463–479.
9.
Newland
,
P. L.
and
Allely
,
B. H.
,
1959
, “
Volume Changes During Undrained Triaxial Tests on Saturated Dilatant Granular Materials
,”
Geotechnique
 0016-8505, Vol.
9
, No.
4
, pp. 174–182.
10.
Nicholson
,
P. G.
,
Seed
,
R. B.
, and
Anwar
,
H. A.
,
1990
, “
Measurement and Elimination of Membrane Compliance Effects in Undrained Testing
,” Earthquake Engineering Research Center, Report No. UBC/EERC-89/10,
University of California
, Berkeley.
11.
Nicholson
,
P. G.
,
Seed
,
R. B.
, and
Anwar
,
H. A.
,
1991
, “
Measurement and Elimination of Membrane Compliance Effects in Undrained Testing of Granular Soils
,” Proceedings, 44th Canadian Geotechnical Conference,
Calgary, Alberta, Canada
.
12.
Nicholson
,
P. G.
,
Anwar
,
H. A.
, and
Seed
,
R. B.
,
06
1992
, “
An Injection-Correction System to Eliminate Membrane Compliance
,”
Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM
, Vol.
15
, No.
2
, pp. 190–197.
13.
Raju
,
V. S.
and
Sadasivian
,
S. K.
,
1974
, “
Membrane Penetration in Triaxial Tests on Sand
,”
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering
,
100
(
4
), pp. 482–489.
14.
Raju
,
V. S.
and
Venkataramana
,
K.
,
1980
, “
Undrained Triaxial Tests to Assess Liquefaction Potential of Sands — Effect of Membrane Penetration
,” Proceedings, International Symposium on Soils Under Cyclic Transient Loading,
Rotterdam
, Vol.
2
, pp. 483–494.
15.
Ramana
,
K. V.
, and
Raju
,
V. S.
,
1981
, “
Constant-Volume Triaxial Tests to Study the Effects of Membrane Penetration
,”
Geotechnical Testing Journal, ASTM
, Vol.
4
, No.
4
, pp. 117–122.
16.
Siddiqi
,
F. H.
,
1984
, “
Strength Evaluation of Cohesionless Soils With Oversize Particles
,” Ph.D. Dissertation,
University of California
, Davis.
17.
Steinbach
,
J.
,
1967
, “
Volume Changes Due to Membrane Penetration in Triaxial Tests on Granular Materials
,” M.Sc. Thesis,
Cornell University
.
18.
Wong
,
R. T.
,
Seed
,
H. B.
and
Chan
,
C. K.
,
1975
, “
Cyclic Loading Liquefaction of Gravelly Soils
,”
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE
, Vol.
101
, No.
6
, pp. 571–583.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal