Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Dynamic Geotechnical Testing II
By
RJ Ebelhar
RJ Ebelhar
1
RUST E&I
?
11785 Highway Drive, Cincinnati, OH 45241
;
symposium chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
VP Drnevich
VP Drnevich
2
Purdue University
?
1284 Civil Engineering Building, West Lafayette, IN 47907
;
symposium co-chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
BL Kutter
BL Kutter
3
University of California
Department of Civil Engineering,
Davis, CA 95616
;
symposium co-chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1877-5
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1877-5
No. of Pages:
438
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1994

The 1986 AASHTO Guide for Design of Pavement Structures and several other mechanistic design approaches use resilient modulus (Mr) as a fundamental property to characterize highway materials. Precise measurement of resilient deformations during laboratory repeated load tests is the key element in obtaining proper and accurate resilient modulus values. An extensive experimental program was initiated at Louisiana Transportation Research Center to develop a testing and interpretation procedure for estimating the resilient modulus of Louisiana soils. This paper presents the results conducted on a locally available blasting sand. A statistically designed experimental factorial was used to evaluate the repeatability and the influence of measurement systems as well as AASHTO procedures. Two types of in-cell measurement systems, one relative to top and bottom platens and the other within the mid-third of the specimen length were used. Also, two different test procedures, AASHTO T-292 and T-294 were examined. Results of this study indicate that the test results are repeatable and the measurement systems and AASHTO procedures do influence the resilient modulus results. Correlations between Mr and bulk stress were also developed using θ model.

1.
Guide for Design of Pavement Structures
,”
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
1986
.
2.
American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials
,
Interim Specifications for Transportation materials and Methods of Sampling and Testing, Part II Interim Test Methods
,
1992
.
3.
Baladi
,
G.
, “
Resilient Modulus
,” Proceedings, Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing State-of-the-Practices,
Oregon State University
,
Corvallis, Oregon
,
03
1989
.
4.
Barksdale
,
R.D.
, et al
, “
Laboratory Determination of Resilient Modulus For Flexible Pavement Design
,” NCHRP Report 1-28,
Georgia Institute of Technology
12
1990
.
5.
Elliot
,
R.P.
, et al
, “
Resilient Properties of Arkansas Subgrades
,” Report No. FHWA/AR-89/004,
Arkansas Highway and Transportation Research Center, University of Arkansas
, Fayetteville,
11
1988
.
6.
Farrag
,
K.
, “
Interaction Properties of Geogrids in Reinforced-Soil Walls Testing and Analysis
,” Ph.D. Dissertation,
Louisiana State University
, Baton Rouge,
1990
.
7.
Ho
,
R.
, “
Repeated Load Tests on Untreated Soils: A Florida Experience
” Proceedings, Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing State-of-the-Practices,
Oregon State University
,
Corvallis, Oregon
,
03
1989
.
8.
Jackson
,
N.
, “
Thoughts on AASHTO T-274-82 Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils
,” Proceedings, Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing State-of-the-Practices,
Oregon State University
,
Corvallis, Oregon
,
03
1989
.
9.
Seim
,
D.
, “
A Comprehensive Study on the Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils
,” Proceedings, Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing State-of-the-Practices,
Oregon State University
,
Corvallis, Oregon
,
03
1989
.
10.
Sneddon
,
R.V.
, “
Resilient Modulus Testing of 14 Nebraska Soils
,” Project No. RES1 (0099) P404,
University of Nebraska-Lincoln
,
11
1988
.
11.
Temple
,
W.H.
and
Carpenter
,
W.
, “
Implementation of the New AASHTO Pavement Design Procedure in Louisiana
,” Report No. FHWA/LA-90/218,
Louisiana Transportation Research Center
,
06
1990
.
12.
Thompson
,
M.
, “
Factors Affecting the Resilient Moduli of Soils and Granular Materials
,” Proceedings, Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing State-of-the-Practices,
Oregon State University
,
Corvallis, Oregon
,
03
1989
.
13.
Thompson
,
M.
, “
Resilient Modulus of Subgrade Soils
,” Proceedings, Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing State-of-the-Practices,
Oregon State University
,
Corvallis, Oregon
,
03
1989
.
14.
Vinson
,
T.
, “
Fundamentals of Resilient Modulus Testing
,” Proceedings, Workshop on Resilient Modulus Testing State-of-the-Practices,
Oregon State University
,
Corvallis, Oregon
,
03
1989
.
15.
Wilson
,
B.E.
, et al
, “
Multiaxial Testing of Subgrade
,” Proc., Transportation Research Board 69th Annual Meeting,
01
1990
,
Washington, D.C.
16.
Woolstrum
,
G.
, “
Dynamic Testing of Nebraska Soils and Aggregates
,”, Proc., Transportation Research Board 69th Annual Meeting,
01
1990
,
Washington, D.C
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal