Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: Twelfth Volume
By
BN Devisetty
BN Devisetty
1
Abbott Laboratories
,
Long Grove, IL
;
symposium chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
DG Chasin
DG Chasin
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
PD Berger
PD Berger
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1439-7
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1439-5
No. of Pages:
389
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1993

Eight tracers were chosen for the study, based on availability, cost, previous work done in this laboratory, and extent of use by other researchers. Laboratory photodegradation was determined for each of the tracers over 0 – 100 minutes under ‘light’ and ‘dark’ conditions. Storage degradation was measured on a modified set of tracers over a period of 41–45 days under ‘frozen’, ‘light lab’, and ‘dark lab’ conditions. Both studies used a Turner 112 fluorimeter.

The photodegradation data suggest that Uvitex EC would be unsuitable for use in any drift trial situation since the fluorescence decreased up to 82 % under light conditions and nearly 16 % under dark conditions. The other tracers generally showed some decreases but not nearly as marked. Storage degradation data showed that the fluorescence of Tinopal CBS-X decreased by as much as 67 % under light lab conditions. The other tracers showed some reductions but not as marked as Tinopal CBS-X.

The results are considered in terms of their practical implications in relation to protocol development for off-target pesticide deposit (drift) studies.

1.
Ciba-Geigy
,
Recommendations for Application of PFM2 Portable Fluorometer and the Fluorescent Tracer Method for the Quick Determination of the Spray Products
,
1985
, pp 1–25.
2.
Drewes
,
H.R.
,
Lauber
,
J.W.
and
Fish
,
J.D.
,
The Spray Drift Task Force: Development of a Drift Study Database for Registration Purposes
,
Proceedings of The Brighton Crop Protection Conference — Pests and Diseases
, Vol.
3
,
1990
, pp 1053–1060.
3.
Guilbault
,
G.C.
,
Principles of Luminescence Spectroscopy. Luminescent Determination of Clinically and Agriculturally Important Samples
,
Pure and Applied Chemistry
 0033-4545, Vol.
57
, No.
3
,
1985
, pp. 495–514.
4.
Neisess
,
J.
, “
Dyes for Water- and Oil-Base Insecticides, “Methods for Sampling and Assessing Deposits of Insecticidal Sprays Released Over Forests
, USDA, Technical Bulletin No. 1596, Washington,
1978
, pp. 17–21.
5.
Reichard
,
D.L.
,
A System for Producing Various Sizes, Numbers and Frequencies of Uniform-Size Drops
,
Transactions of the ASAE
 0001-2351,
33
(
6
),
1990
, pp. 1767–1770.
6.
Sharp
,
R.B.
,
Spray Deposit Measurement by Fluorescence
,
Pesticide Science
 0031-613X, Vol.
5
,
1974
, pp. 197–209.
7.
Shipe
,
W.F.
,
Fluorimetric Methods: Applications and Limitations
, Challenges to contemporary dairy analytical techniques,
Royal Society of Chemistry
,
1984
, pp. 167–178
8.
Staniland
,
L.N.
,
Fluorescent Tracer Techniques for the Study of Spray and Dust Deposits
,
Journal of Agricultural Engineering Research
,
4
(
2
):
1959
pp. 110–125
9.
Yates
,
W.E.
and
Akesson
,
N.B.
,
Fluorescent Tracers for Quantitative Microresidue Analysis
,
Transactions of ASAE
 0001-2351,
1963
, pp. 104–107 + 114.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal