Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Fire Hazard and Fire Risk Assessment
By
MM Hirschler
MM Hirschler
1
Safety Engineering Laboratories
,
Rocky River, OH, 44116, symposium chairman and editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1447-8
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1447-0
No. of Pages:
260
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1992

The Building Code Assessment Framework (BCAF) is an analytical tool which systematically evaluates changes to the National and Provincial Building Codes in Canada. It is intended to provide strategic advice to code developers. This paper discusses the fire risk analysis and assessment approach that is part of the BCAF. This approach is a strategic one that provides a systematic and rational method for comparing trade-offs between risk changes and incremental costs as a result of code changes. A fire risk analysis event tree provides a structure at a macro level to optimize the use of existing fire statistics and estimates of fire risk event probabilities by a Delphi Panel. The use of both fire statistics and the Delphi Panel in the analysis is described. The use of the Delphi Panel has proven viable and necessary for applying the BCAF to more than 40 changes to the Ontario Building Code (OBC). The results of analyzing a proposed code change to the OBC (mandating of sprinklers in dwellings) are presented. The cost of mandating residential sprinklers per life saved is judged to be prohibitive. The results of this assessment are compared to other studies. This approach to fire risk analysis and assessment use in the BCAF has proven a viable one for the systematic and quantitative assessment of fire risks because of proposed code changes and provides flexibility for incorporating other experimental fire risk analytical models.

1.
Rawie
,
C. C.
, “
Estimating Economic Impacts of Building Codes
,” NBSIR 81-2402,
United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (formerly National Bureau of Standards)
, Gaithersburg, MD,
1981
.
2.
Harvey
,
C. S.
, “
A Flexible Approach to Fire-Code Compliance
,”
Architectural Record
,
1988
, pp. 130–135.
3.
Linestone
,
H. A.
and
Turoff
,
M.
, Eds.,
The Delphi Method
, Techniques and Applications,
Addison-Wesley Publishing Co.
,
Reading, MA
,
1975
.
4.
Donegan
,
H. A.
,
Shields
,
T. J.
, and
Silcock
,
G. W.
, “
A Mathematical Strategy to Relate Fire Safety Evaluation and Fire Safety Policy Formulation for Buildings
,” in
Proceedings of Fire Safety Science, the 2nd International Symposium
,
Hemisphere Publishing Corp.
,
1988
. pp. 433–441.
5.
Beck
,
V. R
. and
Yung
,
D.
, “
A Cost-Effective Risk-Assessment Model for Evaluating Fire Safety and Protection in Canadian Apartment Buildings
,” paper submitted for presentation at the International Fire Protection Engineering Institute-V,
Ottawa
, 21–31 May 1989,
National Research Council of Canada
,
Ottawa
,
01
1989
.
6.
Beck
,
V. R.
, “
A Cost-Effective, Decision-Making Model for Building Fire Safety and Protection
,”
Fire Safety Journal
, Vol.
12
,
1987
, pp. 121–138.
7.
Harmathy
.
T. Z.
, “
A Suggested Logic for Trading Between Fire-Safety Measures
,”
Fire & Materials
 0308-0501, Vol.
10
,
1986
, pp. 141–143.
8.
Chapman
,
R. E.
,
Hall
,
W. G.
, and
Chen
,
P. T.
, “
A Computerized Approach for Identifying Cost- Effective Fire Safety Retrofits in Health Care Facilities
.” NBSIR 79-1923,
National Institute of Standards and Technology (formerly National Bureau of Standards)
, Gaithersburg, MD,
1979
.
9.
Harmathy
,
T. Z.
, “
A Decision Logic for Trading Between Fire Safety Measures by Delphi Group
,” paper to be submitted to
Fire & Materials
 0308-0501, revised
03
1988
.
10.
Harmathy
,
T. Z.
, “
The Delphi Method—A Complement to Research
,”
Fire & Materials
 0308-0501, Vol.
6
. No.
2
,
1982
, pp. 76–79.
11.
Wilson
D.
and
Schofer
J.
, “
Decision-Maker-Defined Cost Effectiveness Framework for Highway Programming
,”
Transportation and Research Record 677
,
Transportation Research Board
,
Washington, DC
,
1978
.
12.
Merz
.
H. A.
and
Schneider
Th.
, “
Who is Afraid of Risk Criteria?
.”
Hazard Prevention
. Jan./Feb. 1987, pp. 8–13.
13.
Bohnenblust
,
H.
and
Schneider
Th.
, “
From Legal Principles to Engineering Decisions; Where Do We Shift to Quantifications?
,” paper presented at the V. International Safety Summer Symposium on Safety Science,
Leuven, Belgium
,
1983
.
14.
Ruegg
,
R. T.
and
Fuller
,
S. K.
, “
A Benefit-Cost Model of Residential Fire Sprinkler Systems
,” NBS Technical Note 1203,
United States Department of Commerce, National Institute of Standards and Technology (formerly National Bureau of Standards)
,
Gaithersburg, MD
, 1984.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal