Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Current Practices in Ground Water and Vadose Zone Investigations
By
DM Nielsen
DM Nielsen
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
MN Sara
MN Sara
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1462-1
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1462-3
No. of Pages:
439
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1992

Gypsum and fiberglass resistance devices, a heat dissipation sensor, and a miniature resistivity probe were evaluated for vadose-zone monitoring. Tests were performed to determine how well the probes would detect changes in the moisture content of soil or in the chemistry of soil water. The probes were imbedded in a clayey soil. The electrical resistivity of gypsum blocks changed with water content over a broad range of water content in calibration cells. Gypsum blocks successfully indicated changes in water content in columns of soil that were wetted. Wet blocks tended to disintegrate when they were repeatedly removed from and inserted into the soil, but no disintegration of blocks left in unsaturated soil for up to 3 months was observed. The electrical resistance of fiberglass devices decreased with increasing water content and salinity of the soil water in calibration cells. The devices did not work well in tests in which the soil was wetted to near saturation — the readings of the fiberglass devices sometimes changed in the opposite sense to changes in the moisture content of the soil. Heat dissipation sensors provided useful information over a relatively wide range in moisture content, yielded stable readings over periods of several months, and did not appear to be particularly vulnerable to degradation in soil. Miniature electrical resistivity probes yielded stable readings over periods of many months. The probes were found to undergo particularly large changes in readings when the soil was wetted with a liquid having a high electrolyte concentration.

1.
Everett
,
L. G.
, and
McMillion
L. G.
, “
Operational Ranges for Suction Lysimeters
,”
Groundwater Monitoring Review
 0277-1926, Summer, 1985, pp. 51–59.
2.
Peters
,
C. A.
, and
Healey
R. W.
, “
The Representativeness of Pore Water Samples Collected from the Unsaturated Zone Using Pressure-Vacuum Lysimeters
,”
Groundwater Monitoring Review
 0277-1926, Spring, 1988, pp. 96–101.
3.
Everett
,
L. G.
,
McMillion
,
L G.
, and
Eccles
L. A.
Suction Lysimeter Operation at Hazardous Waste Sites
,” in Ground-Water Contamination: Field Methods. ASTM STP 963,
Collins
A. G.
and
Johnson
A. I.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1988
, pp. 304–307.
4.
Bouyoucos
,
G.J.
, and
Mick
A.H.
, “
An Electrical Resistance Method for the Continuous Measurement of Soil Moisture under Field Conditions
,”
Michigan Agricultural Experiment Station
, Technical Bulletin 172,
1940
, 38 p.
5.
Bouyoucos
,
G.J.
, and
Mick
A.H.
, “
Improvements in the Plaster-of-Paris Absorption Block Electrical Resistance Method for Measuring Soil Moisture under Field Conditions
,”
Soil Science
 0038-075X, V.
63
,
1947
, pp. 455–465.
6.
Bourget
,
S.J.
,
Elrick
,
D.E.
, and
Tanner
C.B.
, “
Electrical Resistance Measurements: Their Moisture Hysteresis, Uniformity, and Sensitivity
,”
Soil Science
 0038-075X, V.
86
,
1958
, pp. 298–304.
7.
Bouyoucos
,
G.J.
, “
More Durable Plaster-of-Paris Moisture Blocks
,”
Soil Science
 0038-075X, V.
76
,
1953
, pp. 447–451.
8.
Tanner
,
C.B.
, and
Hanks
R.J.
, “
Moisture Hysteresis in Gypsum Moisture Blocks
,”
Soil Science Society of America Proceedings
 0038-0776, V.
16
,
1952
, pp. 48–51.
9.
Hancox
,
N.
, and
Walker
J.
, “
The Influence of Liquid Resistivity Changes on Plaster-of-Paris Resistance and Capacitance Moisture Gauges
,”
British Journal of Applied Physics
, Vol.
17
,
1966
, pp. 827–833.
10.
Colman
,
E.A.
, and
Hendrix
T.M.
, “
The Fiberglass Electrical Soil-Moisture Instrument
,”
Soil Science
 0038-075X, V.
67
,
1949
, pp. 425–438.
11.
Phene
,
C.J.
,
Hoffman
,
G.J.
, and
Rawlins
S.L.
, “
Measuring Soil Matric Potential In Situ by Sensing Heat Dissipation within a Porous Body: I. Theory and Sensor Calibration
,”
Soil Science Society of America Proceedings
 0038-0776, V.
35
,
1971
, pp. 27–33.
12.
Phene
,
Rawlins, S.L.
, and
Hoffman
G.J.
, “
Measuring Soil Matric Potential In Situ by Sensing Heat Dissipation within a Porous Body: II. Experimental Results
,”
Soil Science Society of America Proceedings
 0038-0776, V.
35
,
1971
, pp. 225–229.
13.
Lee
,
R.K.C.
, and
Fredlund
D.G.
, “
Measurement of Soil Suction Using the MCS 6000 Sensor
,”
Proceedings, Fifth International Expansive Soils Conference
,
1984
, pp. 50–54.
14.
Kirkham
,
D.
, and
Taylor
G.S.
, “
Some Tests of a Four-Electrode Probe for Soil Moisture Measurement
,”
Soil Science Society of America Proceedings
 0038-0776, V.
14
,
1949
, pp. 42–46.
15.
Rhoades
,
J.D.
, and
van Schifgaarde
J.
, “
An Electrical Conductivity Probe for Determining Soil Salinity
,”
Soil Science Society of America Journal
 0038-0776, V.
40
,
1976
, pp. 647–651.
16.
Rhoades
,
J.D.
, “
Inexpensive Four-Electrode Probe for Monitoring Soil Salinity
,”
Soil Science Society of America Journal
 0038-0776, V.
43
,
1979
, pp. 817–818.
17.
Wilson
,
L. G.
, “
Monitoring the Vadose Zone: Part III
,”
Ground Water Monitoring Review
 0277-1926, V.
3
, N.
1
,
1883
, pp. 155–156.
18.
Burton
,
P. M.
, “
An Evaluation of Three Vadose Zone Monitoring Techniques
,” M. S. Thesis,
Univ. of Texas
, Austin, Texas,
1987
, 130 p.
19.
Hwang
,
S. D.
, “
Four Types of Probes for Monitoring the Vadose Zone
,” M. S. Thesis,
Univ. of Texas
, Austin, Texas,
1987
, 118 p.
20.
Johnson
,
A. I.
, “
Methods of Measuring Soil Moisture in the Field
,” U. S. Geological Survey Water Supply Paper 1619, 25 p.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal