Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Aquatic Toxicology and Risk Assessment: Thirteenth VolumeAvailable to Purchase
By
WG Landis
WG Landis
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
WH van der Schalie
WH van der Schalie
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1460-5
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1460-9
No. of Pages:
387
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1990

Different areas along the rapidly developing South Carolina coastline were examined for heavy metal (Cr, Cu, Pb, Ni) inputs to nearby aquatic ecosystems using sediment levels as the relative indicator of contamination. The American oyster, Crassostrea virginica (Gmelin), was monitored concurrently for metal concentrations to assess what portion of the total sediment metal burden was biologically available for uptake and accumulation. This was accomplished by computation of a sediment bioavailability factor (SBAF) that allowed the integration of sediment and tissue data into a quantitative index useful for relative comparisons between areas.

The SBAFs calculated for the land-use practices of recreational marinas, an industrial waste water treatment facility, and an abandoned industrial site were compared and contrasted with each other and with other sites that ranged from pristine to contaminated. A graded effect on availability of metals from sediments to oysters was observed. Those practices with continuous inputs exhibited higher bioavailability factors than did those that were intermittent.

1.
Langston
,
W. J.
and
Bryan
,
G. W.
, “
The Relationships Between Metal Speciation in the Environment and Bioaccumulation in Aquatic Organisms
,” in
Complexation of Trace Metals in Natural Waters
,
Kramer
C. J. M.
and
Duinker
J. C.
, Eds.,
Martinus Nijhoff/Dr. W. Junk Publishers
,
The Hague
,
1984
.
2.
Luoma
,
S. N.
,
The Science of the Total Environment
, Vol.
28
,
1983
, pp. 1–22.
3.
State of South Carolina Monitoring Strategy for Fiscal Year 1989
,” Technical Report No. 00588,
S.C. Department of Health and Environmental Control
, Columbia, S.C.,
1988
.
4.
Luoma
,
S. N.
and
Davis
,
J. A.
,
Marine Chemistry
, Vol.
12
,
1983
, pp. 159–181.
5.
Likens
,
G. E.
and
Bormann
,
F. H.
,
Bioscience
, Vol.
24
,
1974
, pp. 447–456.
6.
Odum
,
E. P.
,
Science
 0036-8075, Vol.
243
,
1989
, pp. 77–82.
7.
Windom
,
H. L.
, “
Geochemical Interactions of Heavy Metals in Southeastern Salt Marsh Environments
,” EPA Ecology Research Services Report No. EPA-600/3-76-023,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, Corvallis, Ore.
8.
Marcus
,
J. M.
,
Swearingen
,
G. R.
,
Williams
,
A. D.
, and
Heizer
,
D. D.
,
Archives of Environmental Contamination and Toxicology
, Vol.
17
,
1988
, pp. 103–113.
9.
Tentative Digestion of Sediments for Metals Analysis
,”
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
,
Athens, Ga.
,
1973
.
10.
Methods for Chemical Analysis of Water and Wastes
,”
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
,
Cincinnati, Ohio
,
1983
.
11.
Thomson
,
E. A.
,
Luoma
,
S. N.
,
Johansson
,
C. E.
, and
Cain
,
D. J.
,
Water Research
 0043-1354, Vol.
18
,
1984
, pp. 755–765.
12.
Wilcoxon
,
F.
and
Wilcox
,
R. A.
, “
Some Rapid Approximate Statistical Procedures
,”
Lederle Laboratories
,
Pearl River, N.Y.
,
1964
.
13.
Gertz
,
S. M.
, “
Use of Ranking Methods to Assess Environmental Data
,” in
Biological Data in Water Pollution Assessment: Quantitative and Statistical Analyses
, ASTM STP 652,
Dickson
K. C.
,
Cairns
,
J.
 Jr.
, and
Livingston
R. J.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1978
, pp. 68–77.
14.
Wright
,
D. A.
,
Mihursky
,
J. A.
, and
Phelps
,
H. L.
,
Marine Environmental Research
, Vol.
16
,
1985
, pp. 181–197.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal