Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Fracture Mechanics: Twenty-First Symposium
By
JP Gudas
JP Gudas
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
JA Joyce
JA Joyce
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
EM Hackett
EM Hackett
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1299-8
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1299-5
No. of Pages:
629
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1990

In many structural flaw evaluations, frequently it is necessary to predict the maximum load where a ductile tearing failure mode is expected. In such a calculation, large ductile crack growth needs to be accounted for to predict the maximum load, especially for large structures and/or lower toughness materials. One difficulty in such an evaluation is that the amount of crack growth obtainable in C(T) specimens that can be machined from the material (e.g., from a pipe) is relatively small. Because of this, it is necessary to extrapolate the J-R curves to the larger amount of crack growth. No generally accepted method exists for such extrapolations.

This paper discusses methods used to evaluate J-R curves extrapolation techniques. As part of this study, several materials were evaluated using C(T) specimens of various sizes but with the same thickness. This is frequently the case for piping, whereas for a pressure vessel or other heavy-wall structure the specimens will frequently not even be the same thickness as the structure. The results in this study showed more geometry effects with the JM-R curve than expected.

1.
Wilkowski
,
G. M.
and others, “
Degraded Piping Program—Phase II
,” Program Report, Oct. 1986–Sept. 1987, NUREG/CR-4082, Vol.
6
,
04
1988
.
2.
Papaspyropoulos
,
V.
,
Marschall
,
C.
, and
Landow
,
M.
, “
Predictions of J-R Curves with Large Crack Growth from Small Specimen Data
,” NUREG/CR-4575,
09
1986
.
3.
Paris
,
P. C.
,
Brunett
,
J. V.
, and
Cotter
,
K. H.
, “
The Effect of Large Crack Extension on the Tearing Resistance of Stainless Steel Piping Materials
,” in
Proceedings
, CSNI Specialist Meeting on Leak-Before-Break in Nuclear Reactor Piping,
Monterey, Calif.
, 1–2 Sept. 1983.
4.
Johnson
,
H. H.
, “
Calibrating the Electric Potential Method for Studying Slow Crack Growth
,”
Materials Research and Standards
, Vol.
5
, No.
9
,
09
1965
, pp. 442–445.
5.
Marschall
,
C. W.
,
Held
,
P. R.
,
Landow
,
M. P.
, and
Mincer
,
P. N.
, “
Use of the Direct-Current Electric Potential Method to Monitor Large Amounts of Crack Growth in Highly Ductile Metals
,” this publication, pp. 581–593.
6.
Ernst
,
H. A.
and
Paris
,
P. C.
, “
Techniques of Analysis of Load—Displacement Records by J-Integral Methods
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report NUREG/CR-1222,
01
1980
.
7.
Ernst
,
H. A.
, “
Material Resistance and Instability Beyond J/-Controlled Crack Growth
,” in
Elastic-Plastic Fracture: Second Symposium: Vol. I—Inelastic Analysis
, ASTM STP 803,
Shih
C. F.
and
Gudas
J. P.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1983
, pp. I-191–I-213.
8.
Hays
,
R.
and
Hackett
,
E.
,
Proceedings of a Specialist Meeting on J-R Curves
, to be published as a NUREG report.
9.
Evaluation of Potential for Pipe Breaks
,” U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission Report NUREG-1061, Vol.
3
,
11
1984
.
10.
Kramer
,
G.
and
Papaspyropoulos
,
V.
, “
An Assessment of Circumferentially Complex-Cracked Pipe Subjected to Bending
,” NUREG/CR-4687,
10
1986
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal