Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Air Change Rate and Airtightness in Buildings
By
MH Sherman
MH Sherman
1
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, University of California
,
Berkeley, CA, 94720
;
editor and symposium chairman
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1451-6
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1451-7
No. of Pages:
317
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1990

Although the prediction of airflow through single-zone buildings has improved significantly during the past ten years, the more complex problem of predicting airflows in a multizone building has seen relatively little progress. One impediment to the solution of this problem has been the lack of reliable measurements of the flow resistances between the zones of such a building. This report analyzes a fan-pressurization technique for measuring the interzonal leakage (inverse flow resistance) in a multi-zone building. The technique involves two blower doors, one in each of the two zones between which the leakage is being measured. The evaluation of the technique is based upon simulations using MOVECOMP, a multizone infiltration and ventilation simulation program, which is used to determine what data would be recorded when using the procedure in a multifamily building under typical wind conditions. These simulations indicate that wind-induced uncertainties in the determined leakage parameters do not exceed 10% for wind speeds lower than 5 m/s. By performing additional simulations, the effects of wind conditions, building location, and measurement protocol on the uncertainties in the measured leakage parameters are examined in detail. These examinations highlight the importance of using an appropriate reference for the pressure difference across the primary-zone envelope.

1.
Feustel
,
H. E.
, “
A Simplified Model for Predicting Air Flow in Multizone Structures
,”
02
1987
, submitted to
Building and Environment
,
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
Report LBL-22325.
2.
Modera
,
M. P.
,
Brunsell
,
J. T.
,
Diamond
,
R. C.
, “
Improving Diagnostics and Energy Analysis for Multi-Family Buildings: A Case Study
,”
proceedings of ASHRAE/DOE Conference, Thermal Performance of the Exterior Envelopes of Buildings III
,
Clearwater, FL
,
12
1985
.
3.
Diamond
,
R. C.
,
Modera
,
M. P.
,
Feustel
,
H. E.
, “
Ventilation and Occupaat Behavior in Two Apartment Buildings
,” Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory, LBL-21862, presented at the 7th AIC Conference,
Stratford-upon-Avon, UK
,
09
1986
.
4.
Panofsky
,
H. A.
,
Dutton
,
J. A.
,
Atmospheric Turbulence
,
John Wiley & Sons
,
New York
,
1984
.
5.
Herrlin
,
M. K.
Luftstromning i byggnader—en berakningsmodell
,” Division of Building Services Engineering,
Royal Institute of Technology
,
Stockholm, Sweden
,
05
1987
.
6.
Herrlin
,
M. K.
, “
MOVECOMP—A Multizone Infiltration and Ventilation Simulation Program
,”
Air Infiltration Review
, Volume
9
, No. 3,
Air Infiltration and Ventilation Center
,
Bracknell, England
,
05
1988
.
7.
Persily
,
A. K.
and
Grot
,
R. A.
, “
Accuracy in Pressurization Data Analysis
,”
ASHRAE Transaction
, Vol
91
, No
II
,
1985
.
8.
Sherman
,
M. H.
Exegesis of Proposed ASHRAE Standard 119: Air Leakage Performance for Detached Single-Family Residential Buildings
,” Proceedings of BTECC/DOE Symposium,
Guidelines for Air Infiltration, Ventilation and Moisture Transfer
,
Fort Worth, TX
,
12
1986
,
Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory
Report LBL-21040.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal