Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Hazardous and Industrial Solid Waste Minimization Practices
By
RA Conway
RA Conway
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
DJ Warner
DJ Warner
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
CC Wiles
CC Wiles
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
EJ Duckett
EJ Duckett
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
JH Frick, Ph.D.
JH Frick, Ph.D.
1
Defense Logistics Agency
?
Alexandria, VA 22304-6100
;
symposium co-chairman and co-editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1269-6
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1269-8
No. of Pages:
220
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1989

Processing of solid waste involves quantification of the performance of separation devices. The concept of efficiency is difficult to define. The literature frequently makes use of recovery, but that can be very misleading, since purity is left unaccounted for. Ideally, one should like to account for both purity and recovery in a single term. This becomes more cumbersome when one is dealing with n-way separators rather than restricting the discussion to binary separators. Criteria for an efficiency expression are discussed, current efficiency parameterization practices are outlined, and a current definition that satisfies all of the common criteria for an efficiency expression is presented. An alternative method of producing the efficiency distribution is developed. The efficiency expression is discussed on the basis of results from the new implementation, and the implications are presented. The use of the efficiency distributions to define the “robustness,” or resistance to perturbation, of the unit in operation is discussed.

1.
Peirce
,
J. J.
,
Stessel
,
R. I.
, and
Vesilind
,
P. A.
, “
Quantifying the Performance of n-Way Separators
,”
Resources and Conservation
, Vol.
10
,
1983
, pp. 243–247.
2.
Rietma
,
K.
, “
On the Efficiency in Separating Mixtures of Two Constituents
,”
Chemical Engineering Science
 0009-2509, Vol.
7
,
1957
, pp. 89–96.
3.
Worrell
,
W. A.
,
Testing and Evaluation of Three Air Classifier Throat Designs
,
Duke Environmental Center
,
Durham, NC
,
1978
, pp. 49–53.
4.
Duke Environmental Center
,
Fundamental Aspects of Air Classifier Operation and Design
, Final Report, DOE Research Contract DE-AC02-79CS20544,
Duke Environmental Center
, Durham, NC,
1981
, Chapter 6.
5.
Stessel
,
R. I.
and
Peirce
,
J. J.
Comparing Pulsing Classifiers for Waste-to-Energy
,”
ASCE Journal of Energy Engineering
, Vol.
112
, No.
1
, April, 1986, p. 1–13.
6.
Rosin
,
P.
and
Rammler
,
E.
, “
Laws Covering the Fineness of Powdered Coal
,”
Journal of the Institute of Fuels
, Vol.
7
,
1933
, pp. 29–36.
7.
Data from
Vesilind
,
P. A.
and
Rimer
,
A. E.
,
Unit Operations in Resource Recovery Engineering
,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
,
1981
, p. 103.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal