Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Skiing Trauma and Safety: Seventh International Symposium
By
RJ Johnson
RJ Johnson
1
University of Vermont
,
Burlington, VT
;
editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
CD Mote, Jr Jr
CD Mote, Jr Jr
2
University of California
,
Berkeley, CA
;
editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
M-H Binet
M-H Binet
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
M-H Binet
M-H Binet
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1197-5
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1197-4
No. of Pages:
404
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1989

In Part I of this two-part article, experiments that measured the response of the lower limb to dynamic, transient torsional loading applied at the boot/foot were described. Test variables included rotation direction, weight bearing, and joint flexion. For one of the three subjects tested, two approaches were explored for specifying parameters (that is, inertia, damping, stiffness) of a three-degree-of-freedom dynamic system model which best duplicated the measured response. One approach involved identification of linear parameters by means of optimization; the other approach entailed estimation. Parameter estimates, which included nonlinear, asymmetric stiffness functions, were derived from the literature. For both approaches, the efficacy of parameters was evaluated in terms of the resulting model's ability to duplicate the measured joint axial rotation. The optimization was undertaken to identify parameter dependence on test variables. Results indicate that, to a degree, parameter values are influenced by test variables. Results also indicate that the nonlinear, estimated model better approximates the experimental data than the linear, identified model.

In addition to identifying parameters of a three-degree-of-freedom model, parameters were also identified for a single-degree-of-freedom model where the motion variable was intended to indicate the rotation of the in vivo knee. It is concluded that the simpler model offers good accuracy in predicting both magnitude and time of occurrence of peak knee axial rotations. Model motion fails to track the measured knee rotation subsequent to the peak, however.

1.
Piziali
,
R. L.
, “
The Dynamic Torsional Response of the Human Leg Relative to Skiing Injuries
,”
Mechanics and Sports
,
Applied Mechanics Division ASME
, Vol.
4
,
1973
, pp. 305–315.
2.
Piziali
,
R. L.
and
Nagel
,
D. A.
, “
Modeling of the Human Leg in Ski Injuries
,”
Orthopedic Clinics of North America
, Vol.
7
, No.
1
,
1976
, pp. 127–140.
3.
Hight
,
T. K.
,
Piziali
,
R. L.
, and
Nagel
,
D. A.
, “
A Dynamic Nonlinear Finite-Element Model of the Human Leg
,” ASME Paper No. 78-WA/Bio-2,
1978
.
4.
Dorius
,
L. K.
and
Hull
,
M. L.
, “
Dynamic Simulation of the Leg in Torsion
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
, Vol.
17
, No.
1
,
1984
, pp. 1–9.
5.
Mote
,
C. D.
, Jr.
and
Lee
,
C. W.
, “
Identification of the Human Lower Extremity in Torsion
,”
Journal of Biomechanics
, Vol.
15
, No.
3
,
1982
, pp. 211–222.
6.
Hull
,
M. L.
and
Johnson
,
C.
, “
Axial Rotation of the Lower Limb Under Torsional Loading: I. Static and Dynamic Measurements in Vivo
,” in this volume, pp. 277–290.
7.
Hull
,
M. L.
, “
The Promise of Computer Controlled Bindings for Alpine Skiing
,”
SOMA
, Vol.
1
, No.
2
,
1986
, pp. 38–45.
8.
Drillis
,
R.
and
Contini
,
R.
,
Body Segment Parameters
, Technical Report No. 1166.03,
Vocational Rehabilitation Administration
, New York,
1966
.
9.
D'Antonio
,
N. F.
and
Bates
,
R. L.
, “
Electrical Ski Boot Release
,” U.S. Patent No. 4,291,894,
1981
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal