Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Performance of Protective Clothing: Second Symposium
By
SZ Mansdorf
SZ Mansdorf
1
S. Z. Mansdorf & Associates, Inc.
?
Cuyahoga Falls, OH 44223
.
Search for other works by this author on:
R Sager
R Sager
2
Sager Corporation
?
Prospect Heights, IL 60070
.
Search for other works by this author on:
AP Neilsen
AP Neilsen
3
US EPA Office of Pesticide Programs
?
Washington, DC 20460
.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-1167-3
ISBN:
978-0-8031-1167-7
No. of Pages:
893
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1988

Work involved during the preflight preparation of spacecraft involves the handling of materials that are very toxic to humans. These toxins attack the respiratory and skin systems and, therefore, impose the requirement for full suit enclosures. The weight, structure, and operating parameters of such a suit can be expected to have a significant effect upon the metabolic and thermal responses of the user, especially in high workload situations and ambient temperature extremes.

This paper describes the testing of the operational version of the Propellant Handler's Ensemble (PHE). In particular, parameters affecting the physiology of the user were measured during a work-rest regimen performed in three temperature environments: −7, 23, and 43°C (20, 74, and 110°F). Six subjects performed tests in these environments in two versions of the PHE, the autonomous backpack version and the hoseline supplied configuration. Measurements included heart rate, four skin temperatures, rectal temperature, oxygen and carbon dioxide in the helmet area, suit pressure, and interior suit temperature.

It was concluded that the weight and configuration of the suit significantly influenced the physiological stress on the user. The weight, at 29.5 kg (65 lb) for the PHE and backpack, proved to be a primary stressor, as indicated by elevated heart rates. The high workload portion of the protocol also taxed the limit of the environmental control unit because of the increased respiratory requirements. Oxygen levels dropped as much as 4% below resting levels and the carbon dioxide level increased by a similar amount. Finally, thermal stress is clearly evident, especially in the 43°C (110°F) tests.

State-of-the-art design techniques in whole body suits do not provide solutions to these problems. Therefore, it has been necessary to institute operational restrictions and impose medical and physical standards to avoid situations that could adversely affect the well-being of the worker.

This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal