Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Aquatic Toxicology and Hazard Assessment: 10th Volume
By
WJ Adams
WJ Adams
1
Montsanto Co.
,
St. Louis, MO
;
sympsium chairman and coeditor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
GA Chapman
GA Chapman
2
Environmental Protection Agency, ERL-Narragansett, Pacific Division
,
Newport, OR
;
symposium cochairman and coeditor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
WG Landis
WG Landis
3
USA Aberdeen Proving Grounds
,
Aberdeen Proving, MD
;
symposium cochairman and coeditor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0978-4
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0978-0
No. of Pages:
588
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1988

Due to the increased emphasis on the use of aquatic toxicity tests to evaluate the quality of complex effluents, there is a need to objectively evaluate the precision of effluent toxicity test methods. Based upon an extensive search of the published and unpublished literature (available through April 1985), the intralaboratory and interlaboratory precision of effluent toxicity test methods was evaluated.

Most of the inter- and intralaboratory studies obtained address the acute toxicity of effluents to three standard test organisms: Daphnia spp. (water fleas); Salmo gairdneri (rainbow trout); and the marine bacterium Photobacterium phosphoreum (Microtox). Only limited data exist for Pimephales promelas (fathead minnows); Mysidopsis bahia (opposum shrimp); and Cyprinodon variegatus (sheepshead minnows). Based on LC50 or EC50 values for 141 effluents for which interlaboratory data were available, 81.6% had coefficients of variation ≤40%, and 74.5% had coefficients of variation ≤30%. For 46 effluents for which intralaboratory data were available, 89.2% had coefficients of variation ≤40%, and 89.2% also had coefficients of variation ≤30%. To put this variability in perspective, coefficients of variation for these replicated toxicity tests with effluents are compared to published precision estimates for analytical chemistry methods.

1.
Bainbridge
,
T. R.
, “
The Committee on Standards: Precision and Bias
,”
ASTM Standardization News
,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
01
1985
, pp. 44-46.
2.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, “
Water Quality Criteria Documents
,”
Federal Register
, Vol.
45
,
28
11
1980
, pp. 79318-79341.
3.
Methods for Chemical Analyses of Water and Wastes
,” EPA-600/4-79-020,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
,
Cincinnati, OH
,
1979
.
4.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, “
Guidelines Establishing Test Procedures for the Analyses of Pollutants Under the Clean Water Act
Federal Register
, Vol.
49
,
26
10
1984
, pp. 43234-43442.
5.
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
, “
Water Quality Criteria; Availability of Documents
,”
Federal Register
, Vol.
50
,
29
07
1985
, pp. 30784-30796.
6.
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
, “
Ceriodaphnia Reproductive Potential Tests on Ambient Stations and Selected Effluents, Naugatuck River, CT
,” prepared for
U.S. EPA's Monitoring and Data Support Division
,
Washington, DC.
,
1984
.
7.
Horning
,
W. B.
and
Weber
,
C. I
, “
Methods for Estimating the Chronic Toxicity of Effluents and Receiving Waters to Freshwater Organisms
,” EPA-600/4-85-014, Draft dated
05
1985
,
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
,
Washington, DC
.
8.
DeGraeve
,
G. M.
,
Cooney
,
J. D.
,
Pollock
,
T. L.
,
Reichenbach
,
N. G.
, and
Dean
,
J. H.
, “
Round Robin Study to Determine the Reproducibility of the 7-day Fathead Minnow Larval Survival and Growth Test
,” prepared for the American Petroleum Institute (API) and the Electric Research Institute, published by
API
,
Washington, DC
.
9.
Grothe
,
D. R.
and
Kimerle
,
R. A.
, “
Inter- and Intralaboratory Variability in Daphnia magna Effluent Toxicity Test Results
;”
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
 0730-7268, Vol.
4
,
1985
, pp. 189-192.
10.
Buikema
,
A. L.
, “
Variation in Static Acute Toxicity Test Results with Daphnia magna Exposed to Refinery Effluents and Reference Toxicants
,”
Oil and Petrochemical Pollution
, Vol.
1
, No.
3
,
1983
, pp. 189-198.
11.
Dorn
,
P. B.
, “
Biological Assessments and Their Applications in NPDES Permits
,” presented at
the International Society of Petroleum Industry Biologists
,
10
1984
, Houston, TX, unpublished manuscript.
12.
Pimephales promelas Acute Toxicity Test
,
EA Engineering, Science, and Technology, Inc.
,
Sparks, MD
, confidential client,
1984
.
13.
Peltier
,
W.
, “
Round Robin Effluent Test
,”
U.S. EPA
, Athens, GA, unpublished data.
14.
Grothe
,
D. R.
, six unpublished studies,
Monsanto Co.
, St. Louis, MO,
05
1985
.
15.
Strosher
,
M.
, “
A Comparison of Biological Testing Methods in Association with Chemical Analyses to Evaluate Toxicity of Waste Drilling Fluids in Alberta
,”
Canadium Petroleum Association
,
Calgary, Alberta
,
1983
.
16.
Peltier
,
W.
, “
Methods for Measuring the Acute Toxicity of Effluents to Aquatic Organisms
,” EPA-600/4-78-012,
U.S. EPA, Environmental Monitoring and Support Laboratory
,
Cincinnati, OH
,
1978
.
17.
Effluent Toxicity Screening Test Using Daphnia and Mysid Shrimp
,”
U.S. Environmental Protection Agency
,
Washington, DC
,
1980
draft.
18.
Mount
,
D. I.
and
Norberg
,
T. J.
, “
A Seven-Day Life-Cycle Cladoceran Toxicity Test
,”
Environmental Toxicology and Chemistry
 0730-7268, Vol.
3
,
1984
, pp. 425-434.
19.
Toxicity Testing of Hazardous Waste
,”
Microtox Application Notes
, No.
M105
,
Beckman Instruments, Inc.
,
Fullerton, CA
,
01
09
1982
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal