Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Fracture Mechanics: Eighteenth Symposium
By
RP Reed
RP Reed
1
National Bureau of Standards
,
Boulder, CO 80303
;
symposium chairman and coeditor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0949-0
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0949-0
No. of Pages:
1132
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1988

The J-integral and the crack-tip opening displacement (CTOD) are widely used throughout the world to measure the fracture toughness of structural materials. There are many similarities between these two parameters, as well as a number of important differences. Because of these differences, the CTOD parameter tends to be more conservative when applied to structures.

The J-integral and CTOD were compared qualitatively and analytically. This work differs from previous comparisons in that the present study compared engineering estimates of J and CTOD, which are not necessarily equal to the true values of J and CTOD. However, the fracture toughness of a material is nearly always characterized in terms of the engineering approximations of J or CTOD.

The main difference between J and CTOD as measures of toughness is that J is directly proportional to the area under the load-displacement curve whereas CTOD is proportional to the clip gage displacement. This means that the relationship between the two parameters depends on strain hardening and constraint.

1.
Wells
,
A. A.
, “
Unstable Crack Propagation in Metals: Cleavage and Fast Fracture
” in
Proceedings
,
Crack Propagation Symposium
, Vol.
1
, Paper 84,
Cranfield, U.K.
,
1961
.
2.
Rice
,
J. R.
, “
A Path Independent Integral and the Approximate Analysis of Strain Concentration by Notches and Cracks
,”
Journal of Applied Mechanics
 0021-8936,
06
1968
, pp. 379-386.
3.
Begley
,
R. A.
and
Landes
,
J. D.
, “
The J-Integral as a Fracture Criterion
” in
Fracture Toughness
, ASTM STP 514,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1972
, pp. 1-23.
4.
Landes
,
J. D.
and
Begley
,
J. A.
, “
The Effect of Specimen Geometry on JIc
” in
Fracture Toughness
, ASTM STP 514,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1972
, pp. 24-39.
5.
Landes
,
J. D.
and
Begley
,
J. A.
, “
Test Results from J-Integral Studies: An Attempt to Establish a JIc Testing Procedure
” in
Fracture Analysis: Eighth Conference
, ASTM STP 560,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1974
, p. 170.
6.
Merkle
,
J. G.
and
Corten
,
H. T.
, “
A J-Integral Analysis for the Compact Specimen, Considering Axial Force as Well as Bending Effects
,”
Paper
No. 74-PVP-33,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
.
7.
Anderson
,
T. L.
,
McHenry
,
H. I.
, and
Dawes
,
M. G.
, “
Elastic-Plastic Fracture Toughness Tests with Single Edge Notched Bend Specimens
,” in
Fatigue and Fracture Toughness—Cryogenic Behavior
, ASTM STP 856,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1985
, p. 210.
8.
Anderson
,
T. L.
and
Williams
,
S.
, “
Assessing the Dominant Mechanism for Size Effects in the Ductile-to-Brittle Transition Region
” in
Fracture Mechanics: Seventeenth Volume
, ASTM STP 905,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1986
, pp. 715-740.
9.
Anderson
,
T. L.
, “
A Constraint-Based Model for Fracture in the Ductile-to-Brittle Transition Region
,” Report 248/1984,
The Welding Institute
, Cambridge, U.K.,
08
1984
.
10.
Dawes
,
M. G.
, “
Elastic-Plastic Fracture Toughness Based on the COD and J-Contour Integral Concepts
” in
Elastic-Plastic Fracture
, ASTM STP 668,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1979
, p. 307.
11.
Iwadate
,
T.
,
Tanaka
,
Y.
,
Ono
,
S.
, and
Watanabe
,
J.
, “
An Analysis of Elastic-Plastic Fracture Toughness Behaviour for JIc Measurement in the Transition Region
” in
Elastic-Plastic Fracture, Second Symposium
, ASTM STP 803,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1983
, p. II-531.
12.
Sumpter
,
J. D. G.
and
Turner
,
C. E.
, “
Method for Laboratory Determination of Jc
” in
Cracks and Fracture: Ninth Volume
, ASTM STP 601,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1976
, p. 3.
13.
Dawes
,
M. G.
, “
A JI Equivalent of the CTOD Test—A Proposal
,”
Welding Institute Research Bulletin
, Vol.
23
, No.
2
,
1982
, p. 50.
14.
Shih
,
C. F.
, “
Relationship Between the J-Integral and the Crack Opening Displacement for Stationary and Extending Cracks
,”
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
, Vol.
29
,
1981
, p. 305.
15.
Andrews
,
W. R.
, “
An Investigation of the Relationships Between J and CTOD
,” Report No. 82TTL227,
General Electric Inc.
, Schenectady, NY,
04
1983
.
16.
Dawes
,
M. G.
, “
The Application of Fracture Mechanics to Brittle Fracture in Steel Weld Metals
,” Ph.D. thesis,
Council for National Academic Awards, The Welding Institute
, Cambridge, U.K.,
12
1976
.
17.
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
, “
Singular Behaviour at the End of a Tensile Crack in a Hardening Material
,”
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
, Vol.
16
,
1968
, p. 13.
18.
Rice
,
J. R.
and
Rosengren
,
G. F.
, “
Plane Strain Deformation Near a Crack Tip in a Power-Law Hardening Material
,”
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
, pp. 1-12.
19.
Schindler
,
H. J.
, “
On the Relationship Between J-Integral and Crack Opening Displacement
,”
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
 0013-7944, Vol.
20
, No.
2
,
1984
, p. 281.
20.
Schroedl
,
M. A.
and
Jolles
,
M. I.
, “
Crack Tip Parameters for Elastic-Plastic Fracture
,” presented at the
ASTM 17th National Symposium on Fracture Mechanics
,
Albany, NY
,
08
1984
.
21.
Kumar
,
V.
,
German
,
M. D.
, and
Shih
,
C. F.
, “
An Engineering Approach for Elastic-Plastic Fracture Analysis
,” EPRI Report NP-1931,
Eletric Power Research Institute
, Palo Alto, CA,
07
1981
.
22.
Towers
,
O. L.
, “
Stress Intensity Factors, Compliances and Elastic η Factors for Six Test Geometries
,” Report 136/1981,
The Welding Institute
, Cambridge, U.K.,
03
1981
.
23.
Rice
,
J. R.
,
Paris
,
P. C.
, and
Merkle
,
J. G.
, “
Some Further Results on J-Integral Analysis and Estimates
” in
Fracture Toughness Testing
, ASTM STP 536,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1973
, pp. 231-245.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal