Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Pesticide Formulations and Application Systems: Seventh Volume
By
GB Beestman
GB Beestman
1
Senior Research Specialist, Formulations
,
Monsanto Agricultural Company
,
St. Louis, MO 63167
;
symposium chairman and co-editor
Search for other works by this author on:
DIB Vander Hooven
DIB Vander Hooven
2
The Andersons
,
Maumee, OH 43537
;
symposium co-chairman and co-editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0970-9
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0970-4
No. of Pages:
245
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1987

The true costs of pesticide application are still ill-defined and frequently misconceived, despite the fact that they form a large, and growing, proportion of the costs of crop protection. Increased efficiency in the application of pesticides is vital for the achievement of maximum economic yield and is a necessary concomitant of the widespread adoption of Integrated Pest Management programs.

Controlled droplet application (CDA) represents a significant advance in the precision of pesticide application over conventional spraying techniques utilizing hydraulic nozzles. It offers advantages in the logistics of the spraying operation as well as reduced environmental contamination and greater potential operator safety. However, a massive and co-ordinated research effort is required to take full advantage of the potential benefits of CDA and to truly advance crop protection as a science.

1.
Jensen
,
P. K
, “
A Review of Yield Responses to Weed Control in One Thousand Spring Barley Experiments
,” in
Proceedings
,
1985 British Crop Protection Conference—Weeds
, p. 687.
2.
Cousens
,
R.
,
Wilson
,
B. J.
, and
Cussans
,
G. W.
, “
To Spray or Not to Spray: The Theory Behind the Practice
,” in
Proceedings
,
1985 British Crop Protection Conference—Weeds
, p. 671.
3.
Rutherford
,
I.
, “
The Faults—The Utilization and Performance of Field Crop Sprayers
,” in
Proceedings
,
1977 Spring National Conference of the Institution of Agricultural Engineers (U.K.)
.
4.
Bals
,
E. J.
, “
The Principles of and New Developments in Ultra Low Volume Spraying
,” in
Proceedings
,
5th British Insecticide and Fungicide Conference
, Vol.
1
,
1969
, p. 189.
5.
Bals
,
E. J.
, “
The Reasons for CDA
,” in
Proceedings
,
14th British Weed Control Conference
, Vol.
2
,
1978
, p. 659.
6.
Bals
,
E. J.
, “
The Reasons for the Development of the CDA Concept and Thoughts on the Application of Its Principles
,” in
Proceedings
,
28th International Symposium on Crop Protection, Ghent
,
1976
, p. 1289.
7.
McConnell
,
K. L.
and
Colvin
,
T. S.
, “
An Economic Comparison of Several Sprayer Systems
,” in
Proceedings
,
ASAE Winter Meeting
,
1984
, Paper No. 84-1519.
8.
Matthews
,
G. A.
and
Mowlam
,
M. D.
, “
Some Aspects of the Biology of Cotton Insects and Their Control with ULV Spraying in Malawi
,” BCPC Monograph No. 11,
1974
, p. 44.
9.
Watson-Cook
,
D. J.
, “
Waterless Spraying from the Ground and from the Air
,” in
Proceedings
,
Cotton Insect Control Conference
,
Blantyre
,
1971
, p. 165.
10.
Wijewardene
,
R.
, “
Systems and Energy in Tropical Farming
,” in
Proceedings
,
ASAE Winter Meeting
,
1978
, Paper No. 78-1511.
11.
Bals
,
E. J.
, “
Where Have All the Droplets Gone?
” in
Proceedings
,
7th Australian Weeds Conference
,
1984
, p. 81.
12.
Hall
,
F. R.
, Ed.,
Improving Agrochemical and Fertilizer Application Technology
,
ARI
,
1985
.
13.
Hollis
,
W. L.
,
Farm Chemicals
,
07
1986
, p. 42.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal