Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
The Pressuremeter and its Marine Applications: Second International Symposium
By
J-L Briaud
J-L Briaud
1Civil Engineering Department,
Texas A&M University
?
College Station, TX 77843 Symposium cochairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
JME Audibert
JME Audibert
2
Earth Technology Corporation
?
7020 Portwest Drive, Suite 150 Houston, TX 77024 Symposium cochairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0454-5
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0454-9
No. of Pages:
506
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1985

Pile foundations in the offshore environment are frequently called upon to resist high horizontal load. Many pressuremeter methods have recently been developed to design piles, including techniques to formulate soil spring P-y curves directly from pressuremeter test results. Lateral soil resistance is now recognized to arise from two components: side shear and front resistance. The field measurement of mobilization rates and prediction of lateral side shear has never been made. This paper reports the attempts to measure lateral friction rates in sand and clay by employing torsion testing as a “yardstick” method. Pure lateral shears are mobilized and the effects of depth and installation method can be studied qualatively. It is suggested that since the soil shear modulus, G, is the controlling variable, the pressuremeter is a suitable insitu tool to duplicate pile installation disturbance and predict side shear mobilization rates.

1.
Smith
,
T. D.
, and
Ray
,
B.
, “
Shear Mobilization on Laterally Loaded Shafts
”, to be published in the
Geotechnical Aspects of Stiff and Hard Clays
,
ASCE Spring Convention
,
Seattle
, April 7–11, 1986.
2.
Briaud
,
J.-L.
,
Smith
,
T. D.
and
Meyer
,
B.
, “
Laterally Loaded Piles and the Pressuremeter: Comparison of Existing Methods
”, ASTM STP 938,
06
1983
.
3.
Smith
,
T. D.
, “
Pressuremeter Design Method for Single Piles Subjected to Static Lateral Load
”,
Dissertation submitted to Graduate College, Texas A&M University
, in partial fulfillment for Doctor of Philosophy,
08
1983
. Vol. I and II.
4.
Smith
,
T. D.
, “
Lateral Shear Transfer on Model Piles
”,
Research Report
to Portland State University Graduate Office, Grant 90-050-5801 TSA,
01
1986
.
5.
Poulos
,
H. G.
, “
Torsional Response of Piles
”,
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division
, ASCE,
08
1981
, pp. 1019-1035.
6.
Randolph
,
M. F.
, “
Piles subjected to Torsion
”,
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division
, ASCE,
08
1981
, pp. 1095-1112.
7.
Coyle
,
H. M.
and
Reese
,
L.
, “
Load Transfer of Axially Loaded Piles in Clay
”,
Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division
, ASCE,
03
1966
, p. 1-26.
8.
Vijayvergiya
,
V. N.
and
Focht
,
J. A.
, “
A New Way to Predict Capacity of Piles in Clay
”,
4th Annual Offshore Technology Conference
,
OTC Texas
,
1982
.
9.
Aurora
,
R.
,
Peterson
,
E. H.
and
O'Neill
,
M. W.
, “
Model Studies of Long Piles in Clay
”,
13th Annual Offshore Technology Conference
, OTC 4149,
Texas
,
1981
.
10.
Coyle
,
M. M.
and
Castello
,
R.
, “
New Design Correlations for Piles in Sand
”,
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division
, ASCE,
07
1981
, pp. 965-986.
11.
Reese
,
L.
, “
Laterally Loaded Piles: Program Documentation
,”
Journal of Geotechnical Engineering Division
, ASCE, Vol.
103
,
04
1977
, pp. 287-305.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal