Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Guarded Hot Plate and Heat Flow Meter MethodologyAvailable to Purchase
By
CJ Shirtliffe
CJ Shirtliffe
1Division of Building Research,
National Research Council
,
Canada
K1A 0R6
;
editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
RP Tye
RP Tye
2Thermatest Department,
Dynatech R/D Company
,
Cambridge, MA 02139
;
editor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0423-5
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0423-5
No. of Pages:
252
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1985

The object of this research was to study the effect of various design parameters of a guarded hot plate (GHP) on the error of measurement due to gap unbalance without having to resort to simplifying assumptions as has been the case in existing analytical studies. A better knowledge of this effect could lead to better national standards. It could explain some of the discrepancies often found between the results of round-robin tests. The method used is the finite element (FE) method applied to an axisymmetric GHP. The latter choice is justified by the fine discretization of the domain which is achievable without requiring a huge computer memory. This feature allows us to study the influence of thermopile wires crossing the gap.

The results show that for a given gap unbalance, one is not free to arbitrarily choose the thermopile wire diameter, nor the temperature drop across a given specimen thickness, if one seeks accurate measurements. One cannot achieve precise measurements with one apparatus and only one set of operating conditions that would apply to a broad range of thermal conductivities.

The value of the FE method to solve the differential equation of heat conduction while satisfying the operating boundary conditions of the GHP apparatus is also demonstrated.

1.
Troussart
,
L. R.
,
Journal of Thermal Insulation
 0148-8287, Vol.
4
,
1981
, pp. 225-254.
2.
Donaldson
,
I. G.
,
Quarterly Applied Mathematics
, No.
19
,
1961
, pp. 205-219.
3.
Donaldson
,
I. G.
,
British Journal of Applied Physics
 0508-3443, Vol.
13
,
1962
, pp. 598-602.
4.
Woodside
,
W.
,
Review of Scientific Instruments
 0034-6748, Vol.
28
, No.
12
,
1957
, pp. 1033-1037.
5.
Somers
,
E. V.
and
Cyphers
,
J. A.
,
Review of Scientific Instruments
 0034-6748, Vol.
22
, No.
8
,
1951
, pp. 583-586.
6.
Bode
,
K. H.
,
International Journal of Heat Mass Transfer
, Vol.
23
,
1980
, pp. 961-970.
7.
Desai
,
C. S.
and
Abel
,
J. F.
,
Introduction to the Finite Element Method
,
Van Nostrand-Reinhold
,
New York
,
1972
, pp. 4-5 and pp. 435-438.
8.
Myers
,
G. E.
,
Analytical Methods in Conduction Heat Transfer
,
MacGraw Hill
,
New York
,
1971
, p. 342 and pp. 385-387.
9.
Gallagher
,
R. H.
,
Finite Element Analysis Fundamentals
,
Prentice Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, NJ
,
1975
, pp. 71-74.
10.
Huebner
,
K. H.
,
The Finite Element Method for Engineers
,
Wiley Interscience
,
New York
,
1975
, p. 253.
11.
Emery
,
A. F.
and
Carson
,
W. W.
, “
An Evaluation of the Use of the Finite Element Method in the Computation of Temperature
,” Sandia Lab Report SCL-RR-69-83,
08
1969
, ASME Paper 69 WA/HT-38.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal