Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Fracture Mechanics: Sixteenth Symposium
By
MF Kanninen
MF Kanninen
1
Southwest Research Institute
,
San Antonio, Texas
;
symposium chairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
AT Hopper
AT Hopper
2
Battelle's Columbus Laboratories
,
Columbus, Ohio
;
symposium chairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0225-9
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0225-5
No. of Pages:
686
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1985

Quantification of the fracture toughness improvement in a carbon steel due to normalization was investigated using A516-70 (normalized) and A36 (as-rolled) specimens tested at −40 and −46°C, respectively. The A516-70 was in its Charpy transition range and the A36 was on its Charpy lower shelf. This precluded fracture toughness comparison based on ductile tearing. Plasticity considerations excluded the plane strain fracture toughness idealization, and variations in specimen thickness disallowed use of the crack-opening-displacement method. A previously developed three-dimensional finite element (3DFE) estimate of the plastic stress singularity strength at maximum load was used to index fracture toughness which was found insensitive to specimen thickness for those thicknesses examined. The fracture toughness of the normalized steel was 2¼ times that of the as-rolled steel. The 3DFE analysis of the plastic stationary crack indicated, for the tougher A516-70, crack profile blunting and curvature reversal. Through-thickness FE mesh refinement revealed a local maximum value of plastic stress singularity strength removed from the plate midthickness, which confirmed observations made by P. S. Theocaris using the method of caustics. The fracture toughness of A516-70 was predicted reasonably well by a Charpy transition toughness correlation. As expected, the transition regime fracture toughness of the A36 steel was not predictable from its Charpy lower shelf energy.

1.
Modern Steels and Their Properties
, 7th ed.,
Bethlehem Steel Corp.
,
Bethlehem, PA
,
1972
, p. 71.
2.
McLean
,
D.
,
Mechanical Properties of Metals
,
Wiley
,
New York
,
1962
, p. 201.
3.
Stuber
,
A.
 et al
, “
Status Reports on Application of the COD Test Method to the Fracture-Resistant Design of Pressure Vessels
,”
University of Kansas Center for Research
,
Lawrence
, 20 Sept. and 1 Oct. 1979.
4.
Macdonald
,
B. D.
,
International Journal of Fracture
, Vol.
20
,
1982
, p. 179.
5.
Paris
,
P.
 et al
, “
The Theory of Instability of the Tearing Mode of Elastic-Plastic Crack Growth
,” NUREG-0311,
U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission
,
Washington, D.C.
,
08
1977
.
6.
Macdonald
,
B. D.
in
Elastic-Plastic Fracture
, ASTM STP 668,
Landes
J.
,
Begley
J.
, and
Clarke
G.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1979
, p. 663.
7.
Macdonald
,
B. D.
,
Theoretical and Applied Fracture Mechanics
 0167-8442, Vol.
1
,
1984
, pp. 169-180.
8.
Hilton
,
P. D.
and
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
,
Engineering Fracture Mechanics
 0013-7944, Vol.
3
,
1971
, p. 435.
9.
Hutchinson
,
J. W.
,
Journal of the Mechanics and Physics of Solids
 0022-5096, Vol.
16
,
1968
, p. 13.
10.
ANSYS User's Manual
,
Swanson Analysis Systems
,
Houston, PA
,
1975
.
11.
Tracey
,
D. C.
,
Nuclear Engineering and Design
 0029-5493, Vol.
26
,
1973
, p. 1.
12.
Roberts
,
R.
and
Newton
,
C.
, “
Interpretive Report on Small Scale Test Correlations with KIc Data
,”
Welding Research Council Bulletin
 0043-2326 
265
, New York.
13.
Shih
,
C. F.
,
deLorenzi
,
H. G.
, and
Andrews
,
W. R.
in
Elastic-Plastic Fracture
, ASTM STP 668,
Landes
J.
,
Begley
J.
, and
Clarke
G.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1979
, p. 65.
14.
Dawes
,
M. G.
in
Elastic-Plastic Fracture
, ASTM STP 668,
Landes
J.
,
Begley
J.
, and
Clarke
G.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1979
, p. 307.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal