Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Liquid Particle Size Measurement Techniques
By
JM Tishkoff
JM Tishkoff
1
Air Force Office of Scientific Research, Bolling Air Force Base
,
Washington, DC 20332
;
symposium cochairman and coeditor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
RD Ingebo
RD Ingebo
2
NASA Lewis Research Center
,
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
JB Kennedy
JB Kennedy
3
United Technologies Research Center
,
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0227-5
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0227-9
No. of Pages:
205
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1984

Although a light-scattering technique, using a single-element photomultiplier tube, has proved to be an accurate tool for determining the Sauter mean diameter (SMD) of a liquid fuel spray, it has been generally considered unsuitable for the measurement of drop-size distribution. Usually, a photomultiplier tube on the receiving side of the optical system is traversed in a direction at right angles to the optical axis, and the scattered light intensity due to the passage of a monochromatic laser beam through the spray is plotted against radical distance to provide a measurement of SMD. In the present study it is shown that this same light intensity profile can be also converted into an energy distribution which is uniquely related to drop-size distribution. Values of SMD obtained with this technique show good agreement with corresponding values as determined by a photographic method. Moreover, the drop-size distribution calculated by the proposed method is found to be almost identical to the distribution exhibited by a standard calibration reticle. Typical examples of SMD and drop-size distribution for sprays produced at various test conditions are presented.

1.
Dickinson
,
D. R.
and
Marshall
,
W. R.
,
Journal of the American Institute of Chemical Engineering
, Vol.
14
, No.
4
,
07
1968
, p. 541.
2.
Chin
,
J. S.
,
Durrett
,
R.
, and
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
, “
The Interdependence of Spray Characteristics and Evaporation History of Fuel Sprays in Stagnant Air
,” to be presented at
Gas Turbine Conference
,
Phoenix
,
03
1983
,
American Society of Mechanical Engineers
.
3.
Dobbins
,
R. A.
,
Crocco
,
L.
, and
Glassman
,
I.
,
Journal
, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Vol.
1
, No.
8
,
1963
, pp. 1882-1886.
4.
Lorenzetto
,
G. E.
and
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
,
Journal
, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Vol.
15
, No.
7
,
07
1977
, pp. 1006-1010.
5.
Swithenbank
,
J.
,
Beer
,
J. M.
,
Abbott
,
D.
, and
McCreath
,
C. G.
, “
A Laser Diagnostic Technique for the Measurement of Droplet and Particle Size Distribution
,” Paper 76-69,
14th Aerospace Sciences Meeting
,
Washington, DC
, 26–28 Jan. 1976,
American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics
.
6.
Roberts
,
J. M.
and
Webb
,
M. J.
,
Journal
, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Vol.
2
, No.
3
,
1964
, pp. 583-585.
7.
Rizk
,
N. K.
and
Lefebvre
,
A. H.
,
Journal of Energy
, Vol.
6
, No.
5
,
1982
, pp. 323-327.
8.
Marchionna
,
N.
,
Watkins
,
S.
, and
Opdyke
,
G.
 Jr.
, “
Turbine Fuel Tolerance Study
,” Technical Report No. 12090,
Avco Lycoming Division
, Stratford, CT.,
10
1975
.
9.
Rosin
,
P.
and
Rammler
,
E.
,
Journal of the Institute of Fuel
, Vol.
7
, No.
31
,
10
1933
, pp. 29-36.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal