Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Environment-Sensitive Fracture: Evaluation and Comparison of Test MethodsAvailable to Purchase
By
SW Dean
SW Dean
1
Chief Engineer—Materials
,
Air Products and Chemicals, Inc.
,
Allentown, Pa. 18105
;
editor
Search for other works by this author on:
EN Pugh
EN Pugh
2
Leader
,
Corrosion Group, National Bureau of Standards
,
Gaithersburg, Md. 20899
;
symposium chairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
GM Ugiansky
GM Ugiansky
3
Deputy Chief
,
Metallurgy Division
, and
Director
,
Corrosion Data Center, National Bureau of Standards
,
Gaithersburg, Md. 20899
;
symposium chairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0264-X
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0264-4
No. of Pages:
578
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1984

Fatigue crack growth rate testing of metallic materials under conditions which involve a corrosive environment is currently an active field of investigation throughout many of the industrialized nations. This research activity is stimulated by important demands for materials utilization in defense, energy, and transportation applications. A recent survey conducted by ASTM Task Group E24.04.05 on Fatigue Crack Growth Rate Testing in Aqueous Environments identified more than 40 laboratories in nine non-communist countries which are engaged in corrosion-fatigue studies using precracked specimens.

Virtually all contemporary corrosion-fatigue crack growth rate testing is conducted using fracture mechanics test methods. ASTM Test for Constant-Load-Amplitude Fatigue Crack Growth Rates Above 10−8 m/Cycle (E 647) provides widely followed procedures for the mechanical aspects of this type of testing. The aforementioned ASTM E24.04.05 survey reported few problem areas in applying the requirements of ASTM E 647 to tests involving corrosive environments. Despite the reported success in applying ASTM E 647 to corrosion-fatigue crack growth rate testing, however, significant questions concerning this type of testing remain to be addressed. Corrosion-related experimental factors can strongly influence test results. Both Navy and nuclear power industry research programs have recognized interlaboratory variability in corrosion-fatigue crack growth rate data to be a potentially serious problem.

The Navy has drafted a proposed Standard Method of Test for Constant-Load-Amplitude Fatigue Crack Growth Rates in Marine Environments. This paper describes the key provisions of this test method, the philosophy underlying its approach, and efforts to verify its provisions.

1.
Crooker
,
T. W.
,
Bogar
,
F. D.
, and
Yoder
,
G. R.
, “
Standard Method of Test for Constant-Load-Amplitude Fatigue Crack Growth Rates in Marine Environments
,” NRL Memorandum Report 4594,
Naval Research Laboratory
, Washington, D.C.,
06
08
1981
.
2.
Crooker
,
T. W.
,
ASTM Standardization News
 0090-1210, Vol.
3
, No.
5
,
05
1975
, pp. 17-19, 43.
3.
European Offshore Steels Research Seminar
,
Cambridge, England
, 27–29 Nov. 1978,
The Welding Institute
,
Cambridge
,
1980
.
4.
Yoder
,
G. R.
,
Cooley
,
L. A.
, and
Crooker
,
T. W.
in
Fatigue Crack Growth Measurement and Data Analysis
, ASTM STP 738,
Hudak
,
S. J.
 Jr.
, and
Bucci
R. J.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
1981
, pp. 85-102.
5.
Wei
,
R. P.
and
Brazill
,
R. L.
in
Fatigue Crack Growth Measurement and Data Analysis
, ASTM STP 738,
Hudak
,
S. J.
 Jr.
, and
Bucci
R. J.
, Eds.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
1981
, pp. 103-119.
6.
Miller
,
G. A.
,
Hudak
,
S. J.
, and
Wei
,
R. P.
,
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
 0090-3973, Vol.
1
, No.
7
,
11
1973
, pp. 524-531.
7.
Pao
,
P. S.
,
Wei
,
W.
, and
Wei
,
R. P.
in
Proceedings
,
Conference on Environment-Sensitive Fracture of Engineering Materials
,
Foroulis
Z. A.
, Ed.,
TMS-AIME
,
1979
, pp. 565-580.
8.
Hudak
,
S. J.
, Jr.
, and
Wei
,
R. P.
,
International Journal of Pressure Vessels and Piping
 0308-0161, Vol.
9
,
1981
, pp. 63-74.
9.
Bogar
,
F. D.
and
Crooker
,
T. W.
,
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
 0090-3973, Vol.
7
, No.
3
,
05
1979
, pp. 155-159.
10.
Kitagawa
,
H.
,
Takahashi
,
S.
, and
Toyohira
,
S.
,
Proceedings of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
, No.
774-11
,
1977
, pp. 53-55.
11.
Nordmark
,
G. E.
and
Fricke
,
W. G.
,
Journal of Testing and Evaluation
 0090-3973, Vol.
6
, No.
5
,
1978
, pp. 301-303.
12.
Endo
,
K.
,
Komai
,
K.
, and
Matsuda
,
Y. Y
,
Bulletin of the Japan Society of Mechanical Engineers
, Vol.
24
, No.
194
,
08
1981
, pp. 1319-1325.
13.
Suresh
,
S.
,
Parks
,
D. M.
, and
Ritchie
,
R. O.
, “
Crack Tip Oxide Formation and Its Influence on Fatigue Thresholds
,” in
Fatigue Thresholds
,
International Conference Proceedings, Stockholm
,
Backlund
J.
,
Blom
A. F.
, and
Beevers
C. J.
, Ed.,
EMAS
,
Warley
,
1981
.
14.
Scott
,
P. M.
, in
Corrosion Fatigue: Mechanics, Metallurgy, Electrochemistry, and Engineering
, ASTM STP 801,
Crooker
T. W.
and
Leis
B. N.
, Ed.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
1983
, pp. 319-350.
15.
Bucci
,
R. J.
in
Fracture Mechanics: Thirteenth Conference
, ASTM STP 743,
Roberts
R.
, Ed.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
1981
, pp. 28-47.
16.
Vasudevan
,
A. K.
and
Suresh
,
S.
,
Metallurgical Transactions A
 0360-2133, Vol.
13A
,
12
1982
, pp. 2271-2280.
17.
Gray
,
G. T
, III
,
Williams
,
J. C.
, and
Thompson
,
A. W.
,
Metallurgical Transactions A
 0360-2133, Vol.
14A
,
03
1983
, pp. 421-433.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal