Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Evaluation and Accreditation of Inspection and Test Activities
By
H Schock
H Schock
1
Product Assurances Consulting
?
Haddonfield, NJ 08033
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0253-4
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0253-8
No. of Pages:
205
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1983

In the course of assisting the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency and the U.S. Geological Survey in automating their water quality surveillance laboratories, quality assurance requirements for this function have been investigated in detail. It was found that while computerization of instruments and functions can be of great assistance in operations, scientific insight must, in the end, be the final judge of quality. These laboratories engage in several kinds of activities that differ in important details. One of them had the primary mission of analytical methods development and validation. Another was an analytical facility for sewage treatment process development. The others engaged in three different activities, special surveys to establish baseline water standards, routine surveillance to detect variations from baseline, and special studies to collect the data for action against polluters. The similarities and differences of requirements in these various situations will be discussed.

1.
Crawford
,
R. W.
and
Barton
,
G. W.
, Jr.
, “
Technicon Autoanalyzers, Functional Description
,”
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
,
Livermore, CA
, UCRL-52046,
04
1976
, and “
Computer Automation of Continuous-Flow Analyzers for Trace Constituents in Water
,”
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
,
Livermore, CA
, Vol.
1
,
Operator Instructions
, UCRL-52532,
04
1979
.
2.
Frazer
,
J. W.
and
Barton
,
G. W.
, et al
, “
A Feasibility Study and Functional Design for the Computerized Automation of the Central Research Laboratory, EPA Region V, Chicago, Ill.
,” in
ASTM Computerized Laboratory Systems
, STP 578,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
Philadelphia
,
1975
, pp. 152-256.
3.
Ames
,
H. S.
,
Barton
,
G. W.
, ,Jr.
Bystroff
,
R. I.
,
Crawford
,
R. W.
,
Kray
,
A. M.
, and
Maples
,
M. D.
, “
A Feasibility Study for the Computerized Automation of the Annapolis Field Office of EPA Region III
,”
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
,
Livermore, CA
, UCRL-52052,
08
1976
.
4.
Morris
,
W. F.
, et al
, “
Feasibility Study of Automation of the Central Laboratories, Water Resources Division, U.S. Geological Survey
,”
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
,
Livermore, CA
, UCRL-52001,
01
1976
.
5.
Ames
,
H. W.
, “
Laboratory Data Management for the Environmental Protection Agency
,”
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
,
Livermore, CA
, UCRL-52054,
04
1976
.
6.
Barton
,
G. W.
, ,Jr.
Gibson
,
L. E.
, and
Tolman
,
L. F.
, “
Ion Counting and Accumulation System for Mass Spectrometry of Very Small Samples
,”
Analytical Chemistry
 0003-2700, Vol.
32
,
11
1960
, p. 1599.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal