Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Corrosion Fatigue: Mechanics, Metallurgy, Electrochemistry, and Engineering
Editor
TW Crooker
TW Crooker
1
Naval Research Laboratory
,
Washington, D.C.
;
symposium co-chairman and co-editor
Search for other works by this author on:
BN Leis
BN Leis
2
Battelle Columbus Laboratories
,
Columbus, Ohio
;
symposium co-chairman and co-editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0245-3
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0245-3
No. of Pages:
543
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1983

This report describes the techniques used and results obtained for fatigue crack initiation of notched compact-type (CT) tests of SA333 Gr.6 carbon steel in air or in autoclaves mostly at 288°C (550°F), 1.05 kg/mm2 (1500 psi) oxygenated water conditions. The fatigue crack initiation life Ni was quantitatively determined from a cycle-by-cycle crack length measurement as the number of cycles of produce 7.6 × 10−2 mm (0.003 in.) of growth from the notch root. Results for several parameters of the experimental program (including temperature, environment, oxygen content, frequency of cycling, notch radius, R-value, and ΔK) are reported. A majority of the tests were run in 288°C (550°F) water at 8 ppm O2 with 5.1 × 10−2 mm (0.002 in.) notch radii, and showed a severe degradation in initiation life, especially at a frequency of 0.00021 Hz (0.0125 cpm), compared with 288°C (550°F) air tests. On the other hand, at 0.021 Hz (1.25 cpm) and 8 ppm O2, decreasing the temperature to 232°C (450°F) restored the life to that of air. Reducing the oxygen level to 0.2 ppm in 288°C (550°F) water was also beneficial. These latter two findings are preliminary because of limited testing.

The test results were interpreted in terms of conventional procedures in which a notch root pseudostress amplitude Sa was calculated for each test and compared with the ASME fatigue data curve for carbon steel. The quantity Sa was obtained from the applied stress intensity range (ΔK) and Neuber notch analysis procedures to account for elasticplastic notch root conditions. The worst-case notch concept was introduced to account for the observed maximum in the fatigue notch factor kf with decreasing notch radii and for the environmental notch sensitivity. For the present study, the worst-case notch radius ρ was 0.165 mm (0.0065 in.).

A procedure is described for calculating Sa and Ni from crack growth data. This procedure assumed a crack to be equivalent to the worst-case notch and provided a good prediction of the ASME fatigue data curve from the ASME crack growth curves in air, both for carbon steel. By using this approach and a conservative threshold stress intensity value for fatigue crack growth in 288°C (550°F), 8 ppm O2 water, a value of Sa was determined below which crack initiation will not occur in this environment, regardless of defect sharpness or frequency of loading. This value of Sa was consistent with the notched CT crack initiation results obtained.

1.
BWR Environmental Cracking Margins for Carbon Steel Piping
,”
First Semiannual Progress Report
, NEDC 24625,
General Electric Co.
, Nuclear Energy Division Report, San Jose, Calif.,
01
1979
.
2.
BWR Environmental Cracking Margins for Carbon Steel Piping
,”
Second Semiannual Progress Report
, NEDC 25145,
General Electric Co.
, Nuclear Energy Division Report, San Jose, Calif.,
07
1979
.
3.
BWR Environmental Cracking Margins for Carbon Steel Piping
,”
Third Semiannual Progress Report
, NEDC 25255,
General Electric Co.
, Nuclear Energy Division Report, San Jose, Calif.,
01
1980
.
4.
BWR Environmental Cracking Margins for Carbon Steel Piping
,”
Fourth Semiannual Progress Report
, NEDC 25322,
General Electric Co.
, Nuclear Energy Division Report, San Jose, Calif.,
07
1980
.
5.
BWR Environmental Cracking Margins for Carbon Steel Piping
,” Final Report,
Electric Power Research Institute Report
NP-2406, Palo Alto, Calif.,
05
1982
.
6.
Jack
,
A. R.
and
Price
,
A. T.
,
International Journal of Fracture Mechanics
, Vol.
6
, No.
4
,
12
1980
, pp. 401-409.
7.
Barsom
,
J. M.
and
McNicol
,
R. C.
in
Fracture Toughness and Slow-Stable Cracking
, ASTM STP 559,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
1974
, pp. 183-204.
8.
Clark
,
W. G.
, Jr.
in
Fracture Toughness and Slow-Stable Cracking
, ASTM STP 559,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
1974
, pp. 205-224.
9.
Rolfe
,
S. T.
and
Barsom
,
J. H.
,
Practure and Fatigue Control in Structures: Applications of Fracture Mechanics
, Chapter 7,
Prentice-Hall
,
Englewood Cliffs, N.J.
,
1977
.
10.
Wilson
,
W. K.
,
Journal of Pressure Vessel Technology, Transactions of ASME
, Vol.
96
, Series J,
1974
, pp. 293-298.
11.
Hudak
,
S. J.
, Jr.
and
Saxena
,
A.
, “
Development of Standard Methods of Testing and Analyzing Fatigue Crack Growth Data
,” AFML Contract F33615-75-C-5064,
10
03
1977
.
12.
Topper
,
T. H.
,
Wetzel
,
R. M.
, and
Morrow
,
J. D.
,
Journal of Materials
, Vol.
4
,
1969
, p. 200.
13.
Peterson
,
R. E.
, “
Notch Sensitivity
,” in
Metal Fatigue
,
Sines
and
Waisman
, Eds., Chapter 13,
McGraw-Hill
,
New York
,
1959
.
14.
Reemsnyder
,
H. S.
,
Society of Automotive Engineers Transactions
, Vol.
88
,
1979
, pp. 1905-1914.
15.
Lawrence
,
F. W.
 et al
in
Fatigue Testing and Weldments
, ASTM STP 648,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
1978
, pp. 134-158.
16.
Solomon
,
H. D.
,
Journal of Materials
, Vol.
7
, No.
3
,
1972
, pp. 299-306.
17.
Mowbray
,
D. F.
in
Cracks and Fracture
, ASTM STP 601,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
1976
, pp. 33-46.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal