Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Selection and Use of Wear Tests for Coatings
By
RG Bayer
RG Bayer
1General Technology Division,
IBM Corporation
,
Endicott, New York
;
symposium chairman and editor
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0710-2
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0710-6
No. of Pages:
487
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1982

One category of machines for determining the low-stress abrasion resistance of materials uses a rubber wheel rotating in a water-sand slurry and rubbing against a stationary specimen. Using the Wet-Sand Rubber-Wheel Abrasion Test Method being developed by the SAE produces a wear scar on the order of 0.25 mm deep in normalized 1090 steel at HRC 30, and so may be unsuitable for testing thin coatings and surface treated materials. This was confirmed in testing boride coatings on steel, the coatings being penetrated prior to completion of the test.

Modified practices were investigated in order to determine procedures more suitable for wet-sand rubber-wheel testing of coatings. Tests were conducted using the SAE Practice, with three rubber wheels of varying rubber hardness but with reduced numbers of revolutions per wheel, and using single rubber wheels and repeated increments of varying numbers of wheel revolutions. The criterion for acceptance of a modified practice was the correlation of weight loss (wear) ratios obtained for selected materials with those obtained using the SAE Practice. Results are discussed in terms of this correlation, and selected modified practices were evaluated for three highly varied coating types; electroplated chromium, a boride diffusion coating, and plasma-sprayed alumina, all on plain carbon steels.

1.
Eyre
,
T. S.
,
Tribology International
 0301-679X, Vol.
11
, No.
2
,
04
1978
, pp. 91-96.
2.
Abrasive Wear—1965
,”
Information Report published by the Society of Automotive Engineers
,
New York
,
08
1966
.
3.
Avery
,
H. S.
, “
Classification and Precision of Abrasion Tests
”,
Source Book on Wear Control Technology, American Society for Metals
,
Metals Park, Ohio
,
1978
, pp. 57-66.
4.
Borik
,
F.
, “
Rubber Wheel Abrasion Test
,” Paper 700687 presented at the
SAE Farm, Construction and Industrial Machinery Meeting
,
Milwaukee
,
09
1970
.
5.
Haworth
,
R. D.
, Jr.
,
Transactions
,
American Society for Metals
, Vol.
41
,
1949
, pp. 819-854.
6.
Brinell
,
J. A.
,
Jernkontorets Annaler
 0021-5902, Vol.
76
,
1921
, pp. 347-398.
7.
Quinn
,
A. C.
, “
The Effect of Carbon Content and Heat Treatment on the Rate of Wear of Plain Carbon Steels
,” Report No. 2,
Ford Motor Co., Tractor Div.
,
24
03
1950
.
8.
Stolk
,
D. A.
, “
Field and Laboratory Abrasion Tests on Plowshares
,” Paper 700690 presented at the
SAE Farm, Construction and Industrial Machinery Meeting
,
Milwaukee
,
09
1970
.
9.
Tucker
,
R. C.
, Jr.
, and
Miller
,
A. E.
, in
Selection and Use of Wear Tests for Metals
, ASTM STP 615,
Bayer
R. G.
, Ed.,
American Society for Testing and Materials
,
1976
, pp. 68-90.
10.
Rabinowicz
,
E.
,
Friction and Wear of Materials
,
Wiley
,
New York
,
1966
, pp. 168-173.
11.
Moore
,
M. A.
, and
Douthwaite
,
R. M.
,
Metallurgical Transactions A
, Vol.
7A
,
12
1976
, pp. 1833-1839.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal