Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Real-Time Radiologic Imaging: Medical and Industrial ApplicationsAvailable to Purchase
By
DA Garrett
DA Garrett
1
National Bureau of Standards
,
Washington, D.C. 20234
;
symposium cochairman and coeditor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
DA Bracher
DA Bracher
2
Man Tech International Corp.
,
Arlington, Va. 22202
;
symposium cochairman and coeditor
.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0546-0
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0546-1
No. of Pages:
354
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1980

Most radiologic imaging utilizes a phosphor as the primary X-ray absorber. The absorption of the X-ray, subsequent X-ray fluorescence and Auger relaxation, and the diffusion and scattering of secondary electrons influence the effective X-ray absorption and the picture noise. Scattering, diffusion, and absorption of the light within the phosphor layer and at its surfaces, and the optical coupling to the photoemitter, photoconductor, or photographic film, influence the sensitivity, noise level, contrast, and resolution of the imaging system. The best X-ray phosphors convert about 20 to 25 percent of the energy of an X-ray into useful radiant energy. The “speed” of phosphor layers has been increased about four times in the past decade. Our understanding of the limitations on their efficiency is incomplete but it is unlikely that materials having efficiencies much inexcess of 25 percent can be found. The quantum absorption in X-ray phosphor screens is clearly important to reducing the statistical noise, or the X-ray dose. While the need for good quantum efficiency is generally well understood, it is less well known that the variability of the amount of light detected between separate X-ray events can seriously reduce the signal-to-statistical noise ratio, even when the quantum absorption is nearly unity. A variation from pulse to pulse causes an additional statistical fluctuation so that the X-ray receptor behaves as though it were absorbing a smaller percentage of the X-ray quanta. The “noise-equivalent absorption” is the most meaningful measure of the degree to which an X-ray receptor preserves statistical information present in the X-ray signal incident on the device. The X-ray absorption is maximized by choosing a phosphor host which has elements with X-ray absorption edges in the most useful energy range, the greatest density, and the greatest thickness possible. Since the modulation transfer function and the limiting resolution decrease monotonically with layer thickness, a compromise between X-ray absorption and resolution must be made. Techniques are now being developed for fabricating screens containing isolated phosphor columns which can “pipe” the light through a thick layer without losing resolution.

1.
Ludwig
,
G. W.
, unpublished.
2.
Bril
,
A.
, in
Luminescence of Organic and Inorganic Materils
,”
Kallman
,
H.
and
Marmor Spruck
,
G.
, Eds.,
Wiley
,
New York
,
1967
, p. 479.
3.
Ludwig
,
G. W.
and
Kingsley
,
J. D.
,
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
 0013-4651, Vol.
117
,
1970
, p. 348.
4.
Alig
,
R. C.
and
Bloom
,
S.
,
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
 0013-4651, Vol.
124
,
1977
, p. 1136.
5.
Storm
,
E.
and
Israel
,
H. I.
, “
Photon Cross Sections from 0.001 to 100 MeV for Elements 1 through 100
,” Report LA-3753,
Los Alamos Scientific Laboratory
, Los Alamos, N. Mex.,
1967
.
6.
Klein
,
C. A.
,
Journal of the Physical Society of Japan, Supplement
, Vol.
21
,
1966
, p. 307.
7.
Rothwarf
,
A.
,
Journal of Applied Physics
 0021-8979, Vol.
44
,
1973
, p. 752.
8.
Kingsley
,
J. D.
and
Ludwig
,
G. W.
,
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
 0013-4651, Vol.
117
,
1970
, p. 353.
9.
Curie
,
D.
and
Prener
,
J. S.
in “
Physics and Chemistry of II–VI Compounds
,”
Aven
H.
and
Prener
J. S.
, Eds.,
North-Holland
,
Amsterdam, The Netherlands
,
1967
, p. 447.
10.
Sternglass
,
E. J.
,
Physical Review
 0031-899X, Vol.
95
,
1954
, p. 345.
11.
Kano
,
T.
and
Otomo
,
Y.
,
Journal of the Electrochemical Society
 0013-4651, Vol.
116
,
1969
, p. 64.
12.
Kingsley
,
J. D.
, unpublished.
13.
Swank
,
R. K.
,
Journal of Applied Physics
 0021-8979, Vol.
44
,
1973
, p. 4199.
14.
Swank
,
R. K.
,
Journal of Applied Physics
 0021-8979, Vol.
45
,
1974
, p. 3673.
15.
Swank
,
R. K.
,
Applied Optics
 0003-6935, Vol.
12
,
1973
, p. 1865.
16.
Swank
,
R. K.
, private communication.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal