Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Fatigue of Composite Materials
By
JR Hancock
JR Hancock
1
symposium chairman
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0346-8
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0346-7
No. of Pages:
342
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1975
eBook Chapter
Flexural-Fatigue Evaluation of Aluminum-Alloy and Kraft-Paper Honeycomb-Sandwich Beams
By
NL Person
,
NL Person
1
Senior research engineer
, Kaiser Aluminum and Chemical Corporation, Center for Technology
, Pleasanton, Calif. 94566
Search for other works by this author on:
TN Bitzer
TN Bitzer
2
Supervisor
, Structural Design and Testing, Hexcel Corporation
, Dublin, Calif. 94566
Search for other works by this author on:
Page Count:
11
-
Published:1975
Citation
Person, N, & Bitzer, T. "Flexural-Fatigue Evaluation of Aluminum-Alloy and Kraft-Paper Honeycomb-Sandwich Beams." Fatigue of Composite Materials. Ed. Hancock, J. 100 Barr Harbor Drive, PO Box C700, West Conshohocken, PA 19428-2959 : ASTM International, 1975.
Download citation file:
Flexural static and fatigue tests were conducted on 3-in.-thick honeycomb-sandwich beams having either aluminum-alloy or kraft-paper cores and identical aluminum facings. When the beams have relatively small ratios of length to thickness (short spans, thick cores), the static and fatigue strengths are determined primarily by the shear properties of the core material. In this case, the aluminum honeycomb sandwich was stronger than the kraft-paper honeycomb sandwich. With longer beams, the strengths are dependent mainly on the properties of the facing materials. Since the facings were the same for the two types of sandwiches, the respective static and fatigue properties were approximately equal.
References
1.
Werren
, F.
, “Fatigue of Sandwich Constructions for Aircraft, Aluminum Face and Paper Honeycomb Core Sandwich Material Tested in Shear
,” FPL 1559-A, Forest Products Laboratory
, Madison, Wis., 1947
.2.
Werren
, F.
, “Fatigue of Sandwich Construction for Aircraft, Aluminum Facing and Expanded Aluminum Honeycomb Core Sandwich Material Tested in Shear
,” FPL 1559-K, Forest Products Laboratory
, Madison, Wis., 1952
.3.
Apodaca
, D. R.
and Preston
, J. L.
, “Fatigue in Shear by Bending of Structural Sandwich Constructions
,” Technical Report No. ASD-TR-61-338. Part II, Northrop Corporation
, Hawthorne, Calif., 03
1963
.4.
Jenkinson
, P. M.
and Kuenzi
, E. W.
, “Fatigue Properties of Some Aluminum and Stainless Steel Sandwich Construction
,” Technical Documentary Report No. ASD-TDR-62-1003, Forest Products Laboratory
, Madison, Wis., 03
1963
.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Email alerts
Related Chapters
Foreign Object Damage and Fatigue Interaction in Unidirectional Boron/Aluminum-6061
Fatigue of Composite Materials
Fatigue, Creep, and Impact Resistance of Aramid Fiber Reinforced Composites
Composite Reliability
Fatigue of Composites at Cryogenic Temperatures
Fatigue of Filamentary Composite Materials
Introduction and Definitions
Handbook on Stiffness & Damping in Mechanical Design
Related Articles
Two-Dimensional Modeling of Heat Transfer Through Sandwich Plates With Inhomogeneous Boundary Conditions on the Faces
J. Heat Transfer (August,1998)
Identification of Acoustic Characteristics of Honeycomb Sandwich Composite Panels Using Hybrid Analytical/Finite Element Method
J. Vib. Acoust (February,2013)
Fatigue Behavior and Damage Assessment of Stainless Steel/Aluminum Composites
J. Eng. Mater. Technol (April,2011)