Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Sensory Evaluation of Appearance of Materials
By
RS Hunter
RS Hunter
1
Hunter Associates Lab., Inc.
,
Fairfax, Via.
Search for other works by this author on:
PN Martin
PN Martin
2Consumer Products Division,
SCM Corporation
,
New York, N.Y.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0564-9
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0564-5
No. of Pages:
200
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1973

Multidimensional scaling (MDS) is a general term for a class of techniques that can be used to develop spatial representations of psychological stimuli or other objects. The typical input data for these procedures is a matrix of distance-like numbers which indicate how similar or different every stimulus is to each of the others. These similarity or dissimilarity values may be based on objective measurements or subjective judgments. MDS techniques involve iterative algorithms, usually requiring high-speed computers, for constructing the spatial configuration, or “map.”

Although some mention is made of earlier MDS procedures, primary attention is given to describing and illustrating a new technique called “INDSCAL,” for INdividual Differences SCALing. The input to INDSCAL is several matrices of similarities or dissimilarities among the objects, usually one for each subject participating in a study. The output from INDSCAL includes information about the weight, or perceptual importance, of each dimension for every subject, as well as a multidimensional space for the stimulus objects. The applications illustrate the wide range of stimuli and experimental methods that can be used in studies involving MDS, and demonstrate some special advantages of INDSCAL.

1.
Shepard
,
R. N.
,
Psychometrika
 0033-3123, Vol.
27
,
1962
, pp. 125–140, 219–246.
2.
Shepard
,
R. N.
in
Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences
, Vol.
1
,
Theory
,
Shepard
R. N.
,
Romney
A. K.
, and
Nerlove
S.
, Eds.,
Seminar Press
,
New York
,
1972
, pp. 21–47.
3.
Coombs
,
C. E.
,
A Theory of Data
,
Wiley
,
New York
,
1964
.
4.
Torgerson
,
W. S.
,
Theory and Methods of Scaling
,
Wiley
,
New York
,
1958
.
5.
Kruskal
,
J. K.
,
Psychometrika
 0033-3123, Vol.
29
,
1964
, pp. 1–27.
6.
Kruskal
,
J. B.
,
Psychometrika
 0033-3123, Vol.
29
,
1964
, pp. 115–129.
7.
Carroll
,
J. D.
in
Multidimensional Scaling: Theory and Applications in the Behavioral Sciences
, Vol.
1
,
Theory
,
Shepard
R. N.
,
Romney
A. K.
, and
Nerlove
S.
, Eds.,
Seminar Press
,
New York
,
1972
, pp. 105–155.
8.
Wish
,
M.
, “
Notes on the Variety, Appropriateness, and Choice of Proximity Measures
,” unpublished manuscript,
Bell Laboratories
, Murray Hill, N. J.,
1972
.
9.
Bricker
,
P. D.
,
Johnson
,
S. C.
, and
Mattke
,
C. F.
,
Behavioral Research Methods and Instrumentation
 0005-7878, Vol.
1
,
1969
, pp. 148–149.
10.
Pruzansky
,
S.
Judgments of Similarities Among Initial Consonants Using an Auditory Sorting Apparatus
,” presented at meetings of the Acoustical Society of America,
Houston
,
11
1970
.
11.
Rosenberg
,
S.
,
Nelson
,
C.
, and
Vivekananthan
,
P. S.
,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
 0022-3514, Vol.
9
,
1968
, pp. 283–294.
12.
Wish
,
M.
,
Human Factors
 0018-7208, Vol.
9
,
1967
, pp. 529–539.
13.
Carroll
,
J. D.
and
Wish
,
M.
in
Handbook of Perception
, Vol.
2
,
Carterette
E. C.
and
Friedman
M. P.
, Eds.,
Academic Press
,
New York
,
1974
, in press.
14.
Miller
,
G. A.
and
Nicely
,
P. E.
,
Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
 0001-4966, Vol.
27
,
1955
, pp. 338–352.
15.
Wish
,
M.
and
Carroll
,
J. D.
in
Handbook of Perception
, Vol.
2
,
Carterette
E. C.
and
Friedman
M. P.
, Eds.,
Academic Press
,
New York
,
1974
, in press.
16.
Wish
,
M.
,
Deutsch
,
M.
, and
Biener
,
L.
,
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology
 0022-3514, Vol.
16
,
1970
, pp. 361–373.
17.
Wish
,
M.
in
Attitude Research Reaches New Heights
,
King
C. W.
and
Tigert
D.
, Eds.,
American Marketing Association
,
Chicago
,
1971
, pp. 312–328.
18.
Carroll
,
J. D.
and
Chang
,
J.-J.
,
Psychometrika
 0033-3123, Vol.
35
,
1970
, pp. 283–319.
19.
Carroll
,
J. D.
and
Wish
,
M.
in
Contemporary Developments in Mathematical Psychology
, Vol.
2
,
Atkinson
R. C.
,
Krantz
D. H.
,
Luce
R. D.
, and
Suppes
P.
, Eds.,
W. H. Freeman
,
San Francisco
,
1974
, in press.
20.
Tucker
,
L. R.
and
Messick
,
S. J.
,
Psychometrika
 0033-3123, Vol.
28
,
1963
, pp. 333–367.
21.
Tucker
,
L. R.
,
Psychometrika
 0033-3123, Vol.
37
,
1972
, pp. 3–27.
22.
Wish
,
M.
in
Proceedings
, 80th Annual Convention,
American Psychological Association
,
1972
, pp. 301–302.
23.
Helm
,
C. E.
,
Journal of the Optical Society ofAmerica
 0030-3941, Vol.
54
,
1964
, pp. 256–262.
24.
Indow
,
T.
and
Kanazawa
,
K.
,
Journal of Experimental Psychology
 0022-1015, Vol.
59
,
1960
, pp. 330–336.
25.
Carroll
,
J. D.
and
Chang
,
J. -J.
in
Proceedings
, 78th Annual Conventionn,
America Psychological Association
,
1970
, pp. 137–138.
26.
Carroll
,
J. D.
Multidimensional Scaling of Visual Stimuli
,” presented at meetings of the Optical Society of America,
Ottawa
,
10
1971
.
27.
Indow
,
T.
in
Handbook of Perception
, Vol.
2
,
Carterette
E. C.
and
Friedman
M. P.
, Eds.,
Academic Press
,
New York
,
1973
, in press.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.
Close Modal

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal