Skip to Main Content
Skip Nav Destination
ASTM Selected Technical Papers
Evaluation of Relative Density and its Role in Geotechnical Projects Involving Cohesionless SoilsAvailable to Purchase
By
ET Selig
ET Selig
1
Associate Professor
Department of Civil Engineering
State University of New York at Buffalo
?
Buffalo, N. Y.
Search for other works by this author on:
RS Ladd
RS Ladd
2
Laboratory Director
?
Woodward-Moorhouse & Associates, Inc.
?
Clifton, N. J.
Search for other works by this author on:
ISBN-10:
0-8031-0081-7
ISBN:
978-0-8031-0081-7
No. of Pages:
516
Publisher:
ASTM International
Publication date:
1973

Plane strain and triaxial compression tests were conducted on saturated Chattahoochee River sand to demonstrate the effect of relative density and strain conditions on the strength and stress-strain characteristics of sand. Specimens were prepared at relative densities ranging from 30 to 100 percent and consolidated isotropically to an effective confining pressure of 70 psi before shear.

On the basis of experimental data presented in this study, it appears that the increase in relative density of the sand tested decreases its compressibility during consolidation and increases the initial slope of the stress-strain curve, the tendency for volumetric expansion in drained shear, and the tendency for negative pore pressure in undrained shear for both plane strain and triaxial compression tests. The data also indicated that the angle of internal friction for the tested sand was higher, the volumetric strain during shear was more compressional, and the axial strain at failure was lower in plane strain tests than in triaxial compression tests of sand with nearly the same relative density.

1.
Casagrande
,
A.
, “
Characteristics of Cohesionless Soil Affecting the Stability of Slopes and Earth Fills
,” contribution to
Soil Mechanics, 1925–1940
,
Boston Society of Civil Engineers
,
10
1940
.
2.
Bishop
,
A. W.
and
Henkel
,
D. J.
,
The Measurement of Soil Properties in Triaxial Test
,
Edward Arnold
,
London
,
1957
.
3.
Al-Hussaini
,
M.
, “
The Behavior of Sand Under Plane Strain Conditions
,” PhD thesis,
Georgia Institute of Technology
, Atlanta, Ga.,
1968
.
4.
Liam Finn
,
W. D.
,
Wade
,
N. H.
, and
Lee
,
K. L.
,
Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, American Society of Civil Engineers
 0044-7994, Vol.
93
, No.
SM6
,
11
1967
, pp. 297–308.
5.
Casagrande
,
A.
, in
Proceedings
, Soil and Foundation Conference of the U. S. Engineer Department,
06
1938
.
6.
Lee
,
K. L.
,
Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, American Society of Civil Engineers
 0044-7994, Vol.
96
, No.
SM3
,
05
1970
, pp. 901–921.
7.
Lee
,
K. L.
and
Seed
,
B. H.
,
Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, American Society of Civil Engineers
 0044-7994, Vol.
93
, No.
SM6
,
11
1967
, pp. 117–141.
8.
Bishop
,
A. W.
,
Proceedings
, Fifth International Conference of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,
Paris
, Vol.
III
,
1961
, pp. 135–157.
9.
Taylor
,
D. W.
,
Foundamentals of Soil Mechanics
,
Wiley
,
New York
,
1948
, pp. 342– 347.
10.
Skempton
,
A. W.
and
Bishop
,
A. W.
in
Building Material, Their Elasticity and Inelasticity
,
North-Holland Publication Company
,
Amsterdam
,
1954
, p. 467.
11.
Poorooshasb
,
H. B.
and
Roscoe
,
K. H.
,
Proceedings
, Fifth International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering,
Paris
, Vol.
I
,
1961
, pp. 297–303.
12.
Rowe
,
P. W.
,
Journal of Soil Mechanics and Foundation Division, American Society of Civil Engineers
 0044-7994, Vol.
89
, No.
SM3
,
05
1963
, pp. 37–42.
This content is only available via PDF.
You do not currently have access to this chapter.

or Create an Account

Close Modal
Close Modal