With the recent development of micromechanics in micropolar solids, it is now possible to characterize the macroscopic mechanical behavior of cellular solids as a micropolar continuum. The aim of the present article is to apply these methods to determine the micropolar constitutive relation of various cellular solids. The main focus will be on the hexagonal packed circular honeycomb to demonstrate how its constitutive relationship is obtained. In addition, the same method will be applied to determine the material properties of a grid structure and a regular hexagon honeycomb. Since we model the cellular solid as an assembly of Euler–Bernoulli beams, we know that the macroscopic material properties will depend on the cell wall thickness, length, and Young's modulus. From this, and in conjunction with nondimensional analysis, we can provide a closed form solution, up to a multiplicative constant, without resorting to analyzing the governing equations. The multiplicative constant is evaluated through a single numerical simulation. The predicted values are then compared against assemblies with different local properties, using the numerical result as a benchmark since it takes into account higher order thickness effects. It is concluded that our closed form expressions vary from the numerical predictions only when the thickness of the beams increase, as expected since shear effects must be taken into account. However, for most engineering applications, these expressions are practical since our closed form solution with the Euler–Bernoulli assumption only produces about 10% error for most extreme cases. Our results are also verified by comparing them against those reported in the literature.

References

References
1.
Gibson
,
L. J.
, and
Ashby
,
M. F.
,
1999
,
Cellular Solids: Structure and Properties
,
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge, UK.
2.
Lin
,
T.-C.
,
Chen
,
T.-J.
, and
Huang
,
J.-S.
,
2012
, “
In-Plane Elastic Constants and Strengths of Circular Cell Honeycombs
,”
Compos. Sci. Technol.
,
72
(
12
), pp.
1380
1386
.
3.
Chung
,
J.
, and
Waas
,
A. M.
,
2001
, “
In-Plane Biaxial Crush Response of Polycarbonate Honeycombs
,”
J. Eng. Mech.
,
127
(
2
), pp.
180
193
.
4.
D'Mello
,
R. J.
, and
Waas
,
A. M.
,
2013
, “
Inplane Crush Response and Energy Absorption of Circular Cell Honeycomb Filled With Elastomer
,”
Compos. Struct.
,
106
, pp.
491
501
.
5.
Papka
,
S. D.
, and
Kyriakides
,
S.
,
1998
, “
In-Plane Crushing of a Polycarbonate Honeycomb
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
35
(
3–4
), pp.
239
267
.
6.
Poritski
,
H.
, and
Horvay
,
G.
,
1951
, “
Stresses in Pipe Bundles
,”
ASME J. Appl. Mech.
,
18
, pp.
241
250
.
7.
Chung
,
J.
, and
Waas
,
A. M.
,
2000
, “
The Inplane Elastic Properties of Circular Cell and Elliptical Cell Honeycombs
,”
Acta Mech.
,
144
(
1
), pp.
29
42
.
8.
Lin
,
T.-C.
, and
Huang
,
J.-S.
,
2013
, “
In-Plane Mechanical Properties of Elliptical Cell Honeycombs
,”
Compos. Struct.
,
104
, pp.
14
20
.
9.
Eringen
,
A. C.
,
1967
, “
Theory of Micropolar Elasticity
,” Princeton University, Office of Naval Research Department of the Navy, Technical Report No. 1.
10.
Bazant
,
Z. P.
, and
Christensen
,
M.
,
1972
, “
Analogy Between Micropolar Continuum and Grid Frames Under Initial Stress
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
8
(
3
), pp.
327
346
.
11.
Kumar
,
R. S.
, and
McDowell
,
D. L.
,
2004
, “
Generalized Continuum Modeling of 2-D Periodic Cellular Solids
,”
Int. J. Solids Struct.
,
41
(
26
), pp.
7399
7422
.
12.
Chen.
,
J. Y.
,
Huang
,
Y.
, and
Ortiz
,
M.
,
1998
, “
Fracture Analysis of Cellular Materials: A Strain Gradient Model
,”
J. Mech. Phys. Solids
,
46
(
5
), pp.
789
828
.
13.
Wang
,
X. L.
, and
Stronge
,
W. J.
,
1999
, “
Micropolar Theory for Two-Dimensional Stresses in Elastic Honeycomb
,”
R. Soc.
,
445
, pp.
2091
2116
.
14.
Mora
,
R. J.
, and
Waas
,
A. M.
,
2007
, “
Evaluation of the Micropolar Elasticity Constants for Honeycombs
,”
Acta Mech.
,
192
(1), pp.
1
16
.
15.
Chung
,
J.
, and
Waas
,
A. M.
,
2009
, “
The Micropolar Elasticity Constants of Circular Cell Honeycombs
,”
Proc. R. Soc. A
,
465
(
2101
), pp.
25
39
.
16.
Onck
,
P. R.
,
2002
, “
Cosserat Modeling of Cellular Solids
,”
C. R. Méc.
,
330
(
11
), pp.
717
722
.
17.
Fatemi
,
J.
,
Onck
,
P. R.
,
Poort
,
G.
, and
Keulen
,
F. V.
,
2003
, “
Cosserat Moduli of Anisotropic Cancellous Bone: A Micromechanical Analysis
,”
J. Phys.
,
105
, pp.
273
280
.
18.
Bellis
,
M. L. D.
, and
Addessi
,
D.
,
2011
, “
A Cosserat Based Multi-Scale Model for Masonry Structures
,”
J. Multiscale Comput. Eng.
,
9
(
5
), pp.
543
563
.
19.
Trovalusci
,
P.
,
Ostoja-Starzewski
,
M.
,
Bellis
,
M. L. D.
, and
Murrali
,
A.
,
2015
, “
Scale-Dependent Homogenization of Random Composites as Micropolar Continua
,”
Eur. J. Mech. A
,
49
, pp.
396
407
.
20.
Starzewski
,
M. O.
,
2008
,
Microstructural Randomness and Scaling in Mechanics of Materials
,
Chapman and Hall
, London.
21.
Jasiuk
,
I.
, and
Ostoja-Starzewski
,
M.
,
2003
, “
From Lattices and Composites to Micropolar Continua
,”
Micromech. Nanoscale Effects
,
10
, pp.
175
212
.
22.
Li
,
X.
, and
Liu
,
Q.
,
2004
, “
A Version of Hill's Lemma for Cosserat Continuum
,”
Acta Mech. Sin.
,
25
(
4
), pp.
499
506
.
23.
Hohe
,
J.
, and
Becher
,
W.
,
2001
, “
Effective Stress–Strain Relations for Two-Dimensional Cellular Sandwich Cores: Homogenization, Material Models, and Properties
,”
ASME Appl. Mech. Rev.
,
55
(
1
), pp.
61
87
.
You do not currently have access to this content.