A pipeline on the seabed may be struck by moving trawl gear, and that may damage the pipeline. Trenching can be a useful but expensive way to protect the pipeline. Pipe-in-pipe and bundled pipeline systems are widely used in the offshore industry recently because of their high level of thermal insulation and because they lend themselves to rapid and economical installation. However, there is no clearly specified standard method to analyze the overtrawlability of pipe-in-pipe systems. If we apply the same method as for the single wall pipe, it is likely to result in a conservative design for the pipe-in-pipe. The objective of this paper is to investigate the overtrawlability of pipe-in-pipe, especially in the impact phase, and to fill this gap. In this study, the authors demonstrate that a quasi-static analysis can replace a dynamic analysis to some extent because the overall response does not show a big difference. The demonstration is based on both quasi-static indentation tests and impact tests for single wall pipe and pipe-in-pipe, as well as the corresponding finite element (FE) models. The FE models not only help to compare the responses but also offer a way to analyze the overtrawlability of the pipe-in-pipe. The quasi-static FE models are used for a further comparison between a pipe-in-pipe and a 406.4 mm (16 in.) single wall pipe to illustrate the overtrawlability of the pipe-in-pipe.

References

1.
Det Norske Veritas,
2010
, “
Interference Between Trawl Gear and Pipelines
,” Recommended Practice DNV-RP-F111, October.
2.
Trevor Jee Associates
,
1999
, “
Guidelines for Trenching Design of Submarine Pipelines
,” Health and Safety Executive, Offshore Technology Report No. OTH561, available at http://www.hse.gov.uk/research/othhtm/500-599/oth561.htm
3.
Thomas
,
S. G.
,
Reid
,
S. R.
, and
Johnson
,
W.
,
1976
, “
Large Deformations of Thin-Walled Circular Tubes Under Transverse Loading—I: An Experimental Survey of the Bending of Simply Supported Tubes Under a Central Load
,”
Int. J. Mech. Sci.
,
18
(
6
), pp.
325
333
.10.1016/0020-7403(76)90035-7
4.
Ellinas
,
C. P.
, and
Walker
,
A. C.
,
1983
, “
Damage on Offshore Tubular Bracing Members
,” IABSE Colloquium on Ship Collisions With Bridges and Offshore Structures, Copenhagen, May 30–June 2, pp.
253
261
.
5.
Soreide
,
T.
, and
Amdahl
,
J.
,
1982
, “
Deformation Characteristics of Tubular Members With Reference to Impact Loads From Collision and Dropped Objects
,”
Norw. Maritime Res.
,
2
, pp.
3
12
.
6.
Alexander
,
C.
,
2007
, “
Assessing the Effects of Impact Forces on Subsea Flowlines and Pipelines
,”
ASME 26th International Conference on Offshore Mechanics and Arctic Engineering, San Diego, CA, June 10–15
,
ASME
Paper No. OMAE2007-29450, pp.
417
427
.10.1115/OMAE2007-29450
7.
Jones
,
N.
,
Birch
,
S. E.
,
Birch
,
R. S.
,
Zhu
,
L.
, and
Brown
,
M.
,
1992
, “
An Experimental Study on the Lateral Impact of Fully Clamped Mild Steel Pipes
,”
IMechE J. Process Mech. Eng.
,
206
(
25
), pp.
111
127
.10.1243/PIME_PROC_1992_206_207_02
8.
Zheng
,
J.
,
Palmer
,
A. C.
,
Lipski
,
W.
, and
Brunning
,
P.
,
2012
, “
Impact Damage on Pipe-in-Pipe Systems
,”
Proc. Twenty-Second International Offshore and Polar Engineering Conference
, Rhodes, Greece, June 17–22.
9.
Calladine
,
C.
,
1983
, “
An Investigation of Impact Scaling Theory
,”
Structural Crashworthiness: 1st International Symposium held at University of Liverpool, N. Jones and T. Wierzbicki, eds., Butterworth-Heinemann Ltd.
, Oxford, UK, pp.
169
174
.
10.
Palmer
,
A.
,
Touhey
,
M.
,
Holder
,
S.
,
Anderson
,
M.
, and
Booth
,
S.
,
2006
, “
Full-Scale Impact Tests on Pipelines
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
,
32
(
8
), pp.
1267
1283
.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2004.09.003
11.
Jones
,
N.
, and
Birch
,
R. S.
,
2010
, “
Low-Velocity Impact of Pressurised Pipelines
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
,
37
(
2
), pp.
207
219
.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.05.006
12.
Jones
,
N.
, and
Birch
,
R. S.
,
1996
, “
Influence of Internal Pressure on the Impact Behavior of Steel Pipelines
,”
ASME J. Press. Vessel Tech.
,
118
(
4
), pp.
464
471
.10.1115/1.2842215
13.
Ng
,
C.
, and
Shen
,
W.
,
2006
, “
Effect of Lateral Impact Loads on Failure of Pressurized Pipelines Supported by Foundation
,”
IMechE J. Process Mech. Eng.
,
220
(
4
), pp.
193
206
.10.1243/0954408JPME97
14.
Arabzadeh
,
H.
, and
Zeinoddini
,
M.
,
2011
, “
Dynamic Response of Pressurized Submarine Pipelines Subjected to Transverse Impact Loads
,”
Proc. Eng.
,
14
(
0
), pp.
648
655
.10.1016/j.proeng.2011.07.082
15.
Yang
,
J. L.
,
Lu
,
G. Y.
,
Yu
,
T. X.
, and
Reid
,
S. R.
,
2009
, “
Experimental Study and Numerical Simulation of Pipe-on-Pipe Impact
,”
Int. J. Impact Eng.
,
36
(
10–11
), pp.
1259
1268
.10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2009.05.001
16.
Jones
,
N.
,
2012
,
Structural Impact
, 2nd ed.,
Cambridge University Press
, Cambridge, UK.
17.
Malvar
,
L. J.
,
1998
, “
Review of Static and Dynamic Properties of Steel Reinforcing Bars
,”
ACI Mater. J.
,
95
(
5
), pp.
609
616
.
18.
Shen
,
W. Q.
, and
Jones
,
N.
,
1991
, “
A Comment on the Low Speed Impact of a Clamped Beam by a Heavy Striker
,”
Mechan. Struct. Mach.
,
19
(
4
), pp.
527
549
.10.1080/08905459108905155
You do not currently have access to this content.